Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E1T0BW 1 TB
![]() |
Samsung MZ-V9E1T0BW 1 TB2 TB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operates in PCIe 4.0 x4 or PCIe 5.0 2x modes.
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Samsung 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Samsung.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Samsung 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Samsung.

TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects

How to choose the right SSDChoosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
Buy Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E1T0BW 1 TB
When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may receive a affiliate commission.
Samsung MZ-V9E1T0B/AM Samsung 990 EVO Series 1TB PCI Express 5.0 x2 NVMe M.2 2280 Solid State Drive Refurbished MZ-V9E1T0B/A | $347.10 | ||||
Samsung MZ-V9E1T0B/AM | 990 EVO Series 1TB PCI Express 5.0 x2 NVMe M.2 2280 Solid State Drive Refurbished MZ-V9E1T0B/AM | $358.33 | ||||
Samsung MZ-V9E1T0BW Samsung 990 Evo 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 / 5.0 x2 NVMe (v2) 3D NAND TLC (AES-256 / TCG Opal 2.0) M.2 2280 Solid S | $364.84 | ||||
Samsung MZ-V9E1T0BW | 990 Evo 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 / 5.0 x2 NVMe (v2) 3D NAND TLC (AES-256 / TCG Opal 2.0) M.2 2280 Solid State D | $376.67 | ||||
Samsung 990 EVO 1 TB M.2 PCI Express 4.0 NVMe V-NAND TLC MZ-V9E1T0BW | $399.88 | ||||
Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E1T0BW configurations
| Price for Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E1T0BW | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E1T0BW 1 TB | from $347.10 | 5 offers | ||
| Samsung 990 EVO M.2 MZ-V9E2T0BW 2 TB | from $499.00 | 3 offers | ||
Video reviews
We recommendCompare using chart →
















