WD Blue SA510 WDS500G3B0A 500 GB
![]() |
WD WDS500G3B0A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog WD 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models WD.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog WD 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models WD.

TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects

How to choose the right SSDChoosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
Buy WD Blue SA510 WDS500G3B0A 500 GB
All prices 10 →When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may receive a affiliate commission.
WD Blue 500GB SA510 2.5' Internal Solid State Drive SSD - WDS500G3B0A WDS500G3B0A-00AXR0 | $119.35 | ||||
Western Digital - 500GB WD Blue SA510 SATA Internal SSD - SATA III 6 Gb/s, 2.5"/7mm, Up to 560 MB/s - WDS500G3B0A WDS500G3B0 | $159.99 | ![]() | |||
| $159.99 | ![]() | ||||
SanDisk - WD Blue 500GB SA510 2.5" Internal Solid State Drive SSD - WDS500G3B0A WDS500G3B0A | $213.53 | ![]() | |||
Western Digital WDS500G3B0B-00AXS0 Western Digital Blue SA510 500GB SATA 6Gb/s M.2 2280 Solid State Drive (SSD) new WDS500G3 | $306.61 | ||||
5 more offer(s)
WD Blue SA510 WDS500G3B0A configurations
| Price for WD Blue SA510 WDS500G3B0A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WD Blue SA510 WDS100T3B0A 1 TB | from $179.99 | 12 offers | ||
| WD Blue SA510 WDS200T3B0A 2 TB | from $279.99 | 9 offers | ||
| WD Blue SA510 WDS400T3B0A 4 TB | from $574.99 | 12 offers | ||
| WD Blue SA510 WDS250G3B0A 250 GB | from $99.65 | 6 offers | ||
| WD Blue SA510 WDS500G3B0A 500 GB | from $119.35 | 10 offers | ||
Video reviews
We recommendCompare using chart →































