Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP2000GP3A4001 2 TB
Videos 1Photos 10 |
Seagate ZP2000GP3A4001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Seagate 2025 - new products, best sales and most actual models Seagate.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Seagate 2025 - new products, best sales and most actual models Seagate.
TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC: which type of drive memory is better?Important differences between the types of NAND memory TLC, QLC, MLC, SLC, which determine the scope of their use and development prospects
How to choose the right SSD?Choosing an SSD with the required speed and good reliability for home, work and gaming
Buy Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP2000GP3A4001 2 TB
When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Seagate Game Drive PS5 NVMe SSD for PS5 2TB Internal Solid State Drive - PCIe Gen4 NVMe 14 Officially Licensed Up to 7300MB/ | $184.99 | ||||
Seagate Game Drive PS5 NVMe SSD for PS5 2TB - Officially Licensed with Heatsink (ZP2000GP3A1001) ZP2000GP3A1001 | $221.99 | ||||
Seagate Game Drive NVMe PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 Internal SSD with Heatsink for PS5 2TB ZP2000GP3A4001 | $209.99 | ||||
Seagate - Game Drive NVMe 2TB Internal SSD PCIe Gen 4 x4 with Heatsink for PS5 ZP2000GP3A1001 | $184.99 | ||||
Seagate Game Drive PS5 NVMe PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 Internal SSD w/Heatsink, Licensed 2TB ZP2000GP3A1001 | $184.99 |
Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP2000GP3A4001 configurations
Price for Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP2000GP3A4001 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP1000GP3A4001 1 TB | from $109.99 | 5 offers | ||
Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP2000GP3A4001 2 TB | from $184.99 | 5 offers | ||
Seagate Game Drive M.2 SSD for PS5 ZP4000GP3A4001 4 TB | from $449.99 | 1 offer |
Video reviews
We recommendCompare using chart →