Comparison Roborock S5 vs Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua
Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Roborock S5 | Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua | |
| Compare prices 1 | Outdated Product | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
Wet cleaning. Washable HEPA filter. Overcoming thresholds up to 20 mm. Zoning cleaning using the application on the phone. Protection against jamming under furniture. | ||
| Type | robot vacuum cleaner | robot vacuum cleaner |
| Cleaning | dry and wet side brush turbo brush wiping with a cloth | dry and wet 2 side brushes turbo brush |
Robot vacuum cleaner | ||
| Suction power | 2000 Pa | |
| Dust container capacity | 480 ml | 450 ml |
| Water tank capacity | 150 ml | |
| Fine filter | HEPA | |
| Building a room map | rangefinder (laser) | |
| Cleaning area limitation | via the app | |
Features | ||
| Control via smartphone | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa | |
| Scheduled cleaning | ||
| Memory of several maps (floors) | ||
| Remote control | ||
Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5.2 Ah | 2.6 Ah |
| Operating time | 150 min | 200 min |
| Charging time | 5 h | |
General | ||
| Cleaning area | 250 m² | |
| Threshold clearance | 20 mm | |
| Noise level | 67 dB | 50 dB |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 9.65x35x35.3 cm | 7.5x30.5x30.5 cm |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 2.43 kg |
| Added to E-Catalog | march 2018 | december 2016 |
Compare Roborock S5 and Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua
The Roborock S5 robot vacuum and the Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua offer similar features, such as dry and wet cleaning, but differ in several characteristics and user reviews. The Roborock S5 stands out for its high suction power (2000 Pa) and the ability to connect to a smartphone, allowing users to manage cleaning through an app and set a schedule. Users praise its excellent navigation and cleaning quality, although some complain about difficulties with zonal cleaning and getting stuck in complex areas. Meanwhile, the Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua has a longer operating time (200 minutes) and a lower noise level (50 dB), making it more suitable for homes with small children. However, users note that the quality of wet cleaning is not always satisfactory, and the vacuum cannot use cleaning agents. Overall, the Roborock S5 receives more positive reviews for cleaning quality and functionality, while the Gutrend STYLE 200 Aqua is appealing for its long runtime and quiet operation but has some limitations in cleaning quality.
Price comparison
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Roborock S5 often compared
Glossary
Cleaning
The cleaning method determines whether the robot can only collect dry debris or also wipe the floor covering with water, and which methods are available for this.
— Dry. The robot cleans the floor with brushes and an airflow, directing dust, crumbs, hair and pet fur into the dust container. This option is suitable for carpets and hard floors, but does not remove stains and marks from the floor.
— Dry and wet. The device combines debris suction with floor wiping using a damp attachment. Depending on the design, this may be a simple cloth or an active washing module that can better handle fresh stains and shoe marks.
— Side brushes. Small rotating elements that sweep debris along walls, near furniture and out of corners towards the main suction opening. One side brush on the edge of the body sweeps debris along walls, near furniture and out of corners towards the central suction channel. This design is usually sufficient, as the robot most often moves along obstacles with one particular side. Two brushes operate on both sides of the body and cover a wider strip of floor in one pass. This setup is especially convenient when moving along walls and between furniture, although on smooth floors fast brushes can sometimes scatter light debris.
— Extendable brush. A mov...able side brush automatically extends beyond the body when cleaning corners and areas near walls. Compared to a conventional fixed design, it reduces uncleaned areas where the robot body cannot get close enough.
— Turbo brush. A motorized module at the bottom of the robot that picks up debris and directs it into the suction channel. The working part may consist of a roller with bristles, rubber blades, or a combined surface. This system collects pet fur, hair and dirt from carpets more effectively than a simple suction opening, but bristled elements need regular cleaning to remove tangled hair.
— Floor scrubber. An active washing module with rotating mops or a roller that does not simply glide over the floor but mechanically scrubs away dirt. This system removes stains and marks better than a regular cloth.
— Extendable floor scrubber. One of the rotating mops shifts to the side and extends beyond the robot body. This allows the floor to be wiped closer to skirting boards, furniture legs and corners, where a standard fixed floor scrubber leaves a narrow dry strip.
— Vibration wiping. The washing platform rapidly moves the cloth back and forth, increasing friction against the surface. In terms of effectiveness, this option is between a passive cloth and rotating mops, effectively removing light stains and marks.
— Cloth wiping. A damp fabric attachment is fixed under the body and pulled across the floor as the robot moves. This simple solution is suitable for regular removal of fine dust and fresh marks, but barely scrubs off dried dirt.
— Dry. The robot cleans the floor with brushes and an airflow, directing dust, crumbs, hair and pet fur into the dust container. This option is suitable for carpets and hard floors, but does not remove stains and marks from the floor.
— Dry and wet. The device combines debris suction with floor wiping using a damp attachment. Depending on the design, this may be a simple cloth or an active washing module that can better handle fresh stains and shoe marks.
— Side brushes. Small rotating elements that sweep debris along walls, near furniture and out of corners towards the main suction opening. One side brush on the edge of the body sweeps debris along walls, near furniture and out of corners towards the central suction channel. This design is usually sufficient, as the robot most often moves along obstacles with one particular side. Two brushes operate on both sides of the body and cover a wider strip of floor in one pass. This setup is especially convenient when moving along walls and between furniture, although on smooth floors fast brushes can sometimes scatter light debris.
— Extendable brush. A mov...able side brush automatically extends beyond the body when cleaning corners and areas near walls. Compared to a conventional fixed design, it reduces uncleaned areas where the robot body cannot get close enough.
— Turbo brush. A motorized module at the bottom of the robot that picks up debris and directs it into the suction channel. The working part may consist of a roller with bristles, rubber blades, or a combined surface. This system collects pet fur, hair and dirt from carpets more effectively than a simple suction opening, but bristled elements need regular cleaning to remove tangled hair.
— Floor scrubber. An active washing module with rotating mops or a roller that does not simply glide over the floor but mechanically scrubs away dirt. This system removes stains and marks better than a regular cloth.
— Extendable floor scrubber. One of the rotating mops shifts to the side and extends beyond the robot body. This allows the floor to be wiped closer to skirting boards, furniture legs and corners, where a standard fixed floor scrubber leaves a narrow dry strip.
— Vibration wiping. The washing platform rapidly moves the cloth back and forth, increasing friction against the surface. In terms of effectiveness, this option is between a passive cloth and rotating mops, effectively removing light stains and marks.
— Cloth wiping. A damp fabric attachment is fixed under the body and pulled across the floor as the robot moves. This simple solution is suitable for regular removal of fine dust and fresh marks, but barely scrubs off dried dirt.
Suction power
Measured in Pa, this indicator describes the robot vacuum cleaner's suction pressure: the higher it is, the easier it is for the device to pick up heavy debris and clean carpet pile. Values around 2,000–4,000 Pa are usually sufficient for regular cleaning of smooth floors, while 6,000–10,000 Pa and above are better suited for collecting hair, sand, and dirt from carpets or floor joints.
Dust container capacity
The dustbin capacity indicates how much dry debris fits in the robot vacuum’s built-in container before it needs to be emptied. Models with a 200–300 ml capacity are suitable for a small apartment and frequent cleaning cycles, while a 400–600 ml capacity is more convenient for larger areas, pets, or lots of hair. For robots with a self-emptying station, the size of the internal container is less important, as debris is automatically transferred to the docking station’s collection bin.
Water tank capacity
The tank capacity determines the water supply for moistening the pad, rotating mops, or cleaning roller. Compact tanks of around 200 ml are suitable for regular wiping of small areas, while 300–500 ml tanks allow fewer interruptions for refilling during cleaning.
Fine filter
Fine filter captures fine dust, pollen, and other particles that have passed through the main dust container, preventing them from returning to the room air. The higher the class, the more effective the filtration.
— EPA 10. Retains at least 85% of particles of the most penetrating size and provides basic fine filtration of the outgoing air.
— EPA 11. Captures at least 95% of fine particles, making it better suited for regular cleaning of dusty rooms.
— EPA 12. Provides efficiency from 99.5% and noticeably reduces the amount of fine dust returned to the room.
— HEPA 13. Captures at least 99.95% of the most difficult-to-retain particles and is especially useful in homes with allergy sufferers, children, or pets.
— HEPA 14. Retains from 99.995% of such particles and provides the highest level of filtration among the listed classes.
— EPA 10. Retains at least 85% of particles of the most penetrating size and provides basic fine filtration of the outgoing air.
— EPA 11. Captures at least 95% of fine particles, making it better suited for regular cleaning of dusty rooms.
— EPA 12. Provides efficiency from 99.5% and noticeably reduces the amount of fine dust returned to the room.
— HEPA 13. Captures at least 99.95% of the most difficult-to-retain particles and is especially useful in homes with allergy sufferers, children, or pets.
— HEPA 14. Retains from 99.995% of such particles and provides the highest level of filtration among the listed classes.
Building a room map
Map building allows the robot vacuum to memorize the room layout, track covered areas, and plan a systematic cleaning route. The mapping method affects its accuracy, orientation speed, and the device's ability to detect obstacles.
— With sensors. The robot creates an approximate map using data from the gyroscope, motion sensors, wheels, and obstacle collisions. This system is more affordable, but less accurate at determining the exact location of walls and furniture, while accumulated errors may lead to repeated passes or missed areas.
— With a rangefinder. A laser rangefinder, or lidar, measures the distance to surrounding objects and creates an accurate map of the room even before completing a full sweep. It works reliably in low light, confidently detects walls and furniture, and also supports room division and no-go zones.
— With a camera. The camera analyzes the surroundings and navigates using visual objects, helping refine the robot's position and the room layout. Its advantage is the ability to distinguish individual objects, although performance depends more heavily on lighting.
— With a rangefinder and camera. The combined system uses lidar for accurate distance measurement and map building, and a camera to recognize small objects on the floor. Such a robot not only navigates rooms confidently in any lighting but also avoids cables, shoes, toys, and pet...bowls more effectively.
— With sensors. The robot creates an approximate map using data from the gyroscope, motion sensors, wheels, and obstacle collisions. This system is more affordable, but less accurate at determining the exact location of walls and furniture, while accumulated errors may lead to repeated passes or missed areas.
— With a rangefinder. A laser rangefinder, or lidar, measures the distance to surrounding objects and creates an accurate map of the room even before completing a full sweep. It works reliably in low light, confidently detects walls and furniture, and also supports room division and no-go zones.
— With a camera. The camera analyzes the surroundings and navigates using visual objects, helping refine the robot's position and the room layout. Its advantage is the ability to distinguish individual objects, although performance depends more heavily on lighting.
— With a rangefinder and camera. The combined system uses lidar for accurate distance measurement and map building, and a camera to recognize small objects on the floor. Such a robot not only navigates rooms confidently in any lighting but also avoids cables, shoes, toys, and pet...bowls more effectively.
Cleaning area limitation
Cleaning area restriction lets you prevent the robot vacuum from entering certain rooms or selected floor areas. This is useful near pet bowls, fragile items, wires, children’s play areas, or surfaces that should not be wiped with a wet attachment. There are various methods.
— Laser sensor. A separate accessory that creates an invisible boundary — the robot detects it with its sensors and does not cross it. It can be moved between rooms, but the device takes up floor space and usually requires separate power.
— Magnetic tape. A strip is placed on the floor or under a thin covering, creating a physically defined no-go line. This is a simple and reliable method, but the tape may be noticeable in the interior and only restricts the area where it is laid.
— Mobile app. No-go zones and virtual walls are applied directly to the saved map of the room. This option does not require additional accessories, allows you to quickly change boundaries, and is usually the most convenient for regular use.
— Laser sensor. A separate accessory that creates an invisible boundary — the robot detects it with its sensors and does not cross it. It can be moved between rooms, but the device takes up floor space and usually requires separate power.
— Magnetic tape. A strip is placed on the floor or under a thin covering, creating a physically defined no-go line. This is a simple and reliable method, but the tape may be noticeable in the interior and only restricts the area where it is laid.
— Mobile app. No-go zones and virtual walls are applied directly to the saved map of the room. This option does not require additional accessories, allows you to quickly change boundaries, and is usually the most convenient for regular use.
Control via smartphone
Smartphone control allows you to configure and start the robot vacuum cleaner via the branded mobile app. It usually offers mode selection, power and water flow adjustment, cleaning schedules, map viewing, and no-go zone creation. The app also lets you send the robot to a specific room, check the status of consumables, or receive a notification when cleaning is complete. For remote control, most models connect to a home Wi-Fi network.
Voice assistant
Voice assistant lets you control the robot vacuum cleaner with short commands via a compatible smart speaker, smartphone, or smart home system. You can use your voice to start and stop cleaning, return the device to the docking station, and on some models, select a room or operating mode. This feature is especially convenient when your phone is not nearby, but the set of available commands depends on the robot model and the supported platform.













