Comparison Berloga PC Field vs ETE Game Gx Game G2
Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Berloga PC Field | ETE Game Gx Game G2 | |
| Outdated Product | Outdated Product | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
| Product type | gaming | gaming |
| Form factor | Midi Tower | Mini Tower |
CPU | ||
| Chipset | AMD A320 | AMD A320 |
| Type | desktop | desktop |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | Athlon X4 |
| Model | 1200 | 950 |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| TurboBoost / TurboCore | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Speed | 2666 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Number of slots | 2 | 2 |
| Max. memory support | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Graphics card | ||
| Graphics card type | dedicated | dedicated |
| Graphics card model | Radeon RX 470 | GT 1030 |
| Graphics memory | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Storage | ||
| Drive type | HDD+SSD | HDD |
| Drive capacity | 512 GB | 1 TB |
| 2nd drive capacity | 120 GB | |
Back panel | ||
| Connectors | VGA DVI HDMI output DisplayPort | |
| PS/2 | 1 | |
| USB-A 2.0 | 2 pcs | |
| USB-A 5Gbps | 4 pcs | |
Front Panel | ||
| Optical drive | in absent | in absent |
| 5.25" compartments | 1 | |
| mini-Jack (3.5 mm) | ||
| USB-A 2.0 | 1 pcs | 2 pcs |
| USB-A 5Gbps | 1 pcs | |
Multimedia | ||
| LAN (RJ-45) | in absent | 1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | in absent | in absent |
| Sound | 7.1 | |
General | ||
| Lighting type | housing with backlight | |
| Lighting colour | RGB | |
| PSU power | 400 W | |
| Preinstalled OS | without OS | without OS |
| Material | steel | steel |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 390x188x372 mm | |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | october 2019 | july 2019 |
Compare Berloga PC and ETE Game Gx Berloga Field и ETE Game G2?
You may be interested in
Berloga PC often compared
ETE Game Gx often compared
Glossary
Form factor
The form factor of a computer case characterizes, first of all, the internal volume. Main PC Form Factors:
— Midi Tower. A representative of the tower family (tower cases) of medium size — about 45 cm in height with a width of 15-20 cm, with the number of external bays from 2 to 4. Most popular for middle-class home PCs.
— Mini Tower. The most compact "vertical" case type, with a width of 15-20 cm, has a height of about 35 cm and (usually) less than 2 compartments with external access. Used mainly for office PCs that do not require high performance.
— Full Tower. The tower case is one of the largest form factors for PCs today: 15-20 cm wide, 50-60 cm high, with up to 10 externally accessible bays. Most often in this form factor running advanced high performance PCs
— Desktop. Enclosures designed for installation directly on the desktop. They often have the possibility of horizontal installation — in such a way that a monitor can be placed on top of the case — although there are also models that are installed strictly vertically. Anyway, "desktop" models are relatively small.
— Cube Case. Cases having a cubic or close to it shape. They can have different sizes and are intended for different types of motherboards, this point in each case should be clar...ified separately. Anyway, such cases have a rather original appearance, different from traditional "towers" and "desktops".
— Midi Tower. A representative of the tower family (tower cases) of medium size — about 45 cm in height with a width of 15-20 cm, with the number of external bays from 2 to 4. Most popular for middle-class home PCs.
— Mini Tower. The most compact "vertical" case type, with a width of 15-20 cm, has a height of about 35 cm and (usually) less than 2 compartments with external access. Used mainly for office PCs that do not require high performance.
— Full Tower. The tower case is one of the largest form factors for PCs today: 15-20 cm wide, 50-60 cm high, with up to 10 externally accessible bays. Most often in this form factor running advanced high performance PCs
— Desktop. Enclosures designed for installation directly on the desktop. They often have the possibility of horizontal installation — in such a way that a monitor can be placed on top of the case — although there are also models that are installed strictly vertically. Anyway, "desktop" models are relatively small.
— Cube Case. Cases having a cubic or close to it shape. They can have different sizes and are intended for different types of motherboards, this point in each case should be clar...ified separately. Anyway, such cases have a rather original appearance, different from traditional "towers" and "desktops".
Series
The main manufacturers of processors today are Intel and AMD. In 2020, Apple introduced its CPU series M1 (with further development in the form of M1 Max and M1 Ultra), and a couple of years later, it launched the second series (M2, M2 Pro, M2 Max, M2 Ultra), the third (M3, M3 Ultra), and the fourth (M4, M4 Pro, M4 Max). Intel's current series includes Atom, Celeron, Pentium, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7, Core i9, Core Ultra 9, and Xeon. For AMD, this list includes: AMD Athlon, AMD FX, Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7, Ryzen 9..., and Ryzen Threadripper.
In general, each series includes processors of different generations, similar in overall level and positioning. Here is a more detailed description of each of the variants mentioned above:
— Atom. Processors originally designed for mobile devices. They are compact, highly energy-efficient, and low in heat output, but do not "shine" with performance. They are well-suited for microcomputers (see "Type"), and are extremely rare in more "large-format" systems—mainly in the most modest configurations.
— Celeron. Budget-level processors, the simplest and cheapest consumer desktop chips from Intel, with corresponding characteristics.
— Pentium. A family of budget desktop processors from Intel, somewhat more advanced than Celeron, but inferior to models from the Core i* series.
— Core i3. The simplest and cheapest series among Intel's Core desktop chips, includes budget and low-end mid-range chips, which, nevertheless, surpass Celerons and Pentiums in terms of specifications.
— Core i5. A mid-range family among Intel Core processors; indeed, these chips are considered mid-level by desktop standards.
— Core i7. A series of high-performance processors that were long the top of the Core chips; it wasn't until 2017 that they ceded this position to the i9 family. However, having an i7 processor still means a rather powerful and advanced configuration; in particular, such CPUs are found in premium all-in-one computers and are quite popular in gaming systems.
— Core i9. The top series among Intel's general-purpose desktop chips, the most powerful in the Core lineup. In particular, even the most modest models have at least 6 cores. These chips are mainly used in gaming PCs.
— Xeon. High-end Intel processors that go beyond standard desktop chip capabilities. They are designed for specialized applications, appearing primarily in powerful workstations.
— AMD FX. A family of processors from AMD, positioned as high-performance yet affordable solutions — including for gaming systems. Interestingly, some models come with liquid cooling in the purchase package.
— Ryzen 3. AMD Ryzen chips (of all series) are promoted as high-class solutions for gamers, developers, graphic designers, and video editors. AMD was the first to use the Zen microarchitecture with simultaneous multithreading, significantly increasing the number of operations per clock at the same clock frequency. Ryzen 3 is the most affordable and modestly featured family among the Ryzens. These processors are manufactured using the same technology as the upper series, but Ryzen 3 has half of its compute cores deactivated. Nevertheless, this line includes fairly productive models designed for gaming configurations and workstations.
— Ryzen 5. A mid-level family among Ryzen processors. The second series on this architecture, released in April 2017 as a more affordable alternative to Ryzen 7 chips. Ryzen 5 chips have slightly less impressive working characteristics (in particular, lower clock frequencies and, for some models, less L3 cache). Otherwise, they are completely similar to the "sevens" and also qualify as high-performance chips for gaming and workstations.
— Ryzen 7. Historically the first series of AMD processors on the Zen microarchitecture (see "Ryzen 3" above for details). One of the senior families among the Ryzens, outperforming only the Threadripper line; many PCs based on these chips are gaming-oriented.
— Ryzen 9. AMD Ryzen 9 processors debuted on the Zen microarchitecture in 2019. This series became the top of all Ryzens, pushing Ryzen 7 from the pinnacle of honor. The first models of Ryzen 9 had 12 cores and 24 threads, with later ones increasing to 16 and 32 respectively. The processors in this line are traditionally used for professional tasks (design, video editing, 3D rendering), gaming, streaming, and other high-load applications.
— Ryzen Threadripper. High-end specialized processors designed for maximum performance. Installed mainly in gaming systems and workstations.
— Apple M1. A series of processors from Apple introduced in November 2020. They fall under mobile solutions (see "Type" above) and follow the system-on-chip scheme: a single module combines the CPU, graphics adapter, RAM (in the first models — 8 or 16 GB), a solid-state NVMe drive, and some other components (specifically, Thunderbolt 4 controllers). Among PCs, these chips are primarily used in compact net-tops. As for specifications, the initial M1 configurations are equipped with 8 cores — 4 performance and 4 energy-efficient; the latter, according to the creators, consume 10 times less energy than the former. Combined with a 5 nm process technology, this has achieved very high energy efficiency and performance at the same time.
— Apple M1 Max. An uncompromisingly powerful SoC aimed at ensuring maximum labor productivity for Apple's desktop computers when performing complex tasks. The Apple M1 Max lineup was introduced in the fall of 2021, debuting on Mac Studio computers. The Apple M1 Max consists of 10 cores: 8 performance and 2 energy-efficient. The maximum volume of built-in unified memory reaches 64 GB, with a bandwidth cap of 400 GB/s. The graphical performance of the Max-version of the single-chip system M1 is roughly twice that of the Apple M1 Pro. The chip contains over 57 billion transistors. Its design also incorporates an additional accelerator for the professional ProRes video codec, allowing multiple high-quality ProRes video streams in 4K and 8K resolutions to be easily reproduced.
— Apple M1 Ultra. Formally, the M1 Ultra chip consists of two Apple M1 Max processors on a single UltraFusion substrate, enabling data transfer speeds of up to 2.5 Tbps. In "dry" numerical terms, this bundle comprises 20 compute ARM cores (16 high-performance and 4 energy-efficient), a 64-core graphics subsystem, and a 32-core neural computing block. The system on a chip supports up to 128 GB of unified memory. The processor housing accommodates around 114 billion transistors. The main purpose of the Apple M1 Ultra is confident work with complex resource-intensive applications such as 8K video editing or 3D rendering. In practice< the processor can be found onboard Mac Studio desktop computers.
— Apple M2 / M2 Pro. The second edition of the M-series processors from Apple, released in early summer 2022. M2 chips are produced using an updated 5 nm process and house a quarter more transistors than the Apple M1 processor generation. Architecturally, their CPU block consists of four high-performance and four energy-efficient cores. The graphics accelerator has a 10-core structure. The Apple M2 uses a neural engine and also adds a powerful ProRes video engine for hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding up to 8K resolution. External 6K display support is claimed for the M2 generation.
The M2 Pro SoC aims to scale the M2 architecture. It contains approximately 40 billion transistors and is built with 5-nanometer technology. The system features a 10- or 12-core central processor, up to 19 graphics cores, 16 or 32 GB of unified memory used as both operational and video memory. The graphics performance of the M2 Pro provides high-speed image processing and video rendering. These processors can be found in Apple Mac mini computers.
— Apple M2 Max / Ultra. High-performance SoCs for dealing with resource-intensive tasks, debuting in early summer 2023. The M2 Max chip systems have up to 12 central processor cores (8 performance and 4 energy-efficient compute cores), come with 30 graphics cores, and support up to 96 GB of unified memory with a bandwidth of up to 400 Gbps. They also include a fast 16-core neural engine, powerful multimedia engine, two video encoding modules, and two ProRes modules. The processor is manufactured using a 5-nanometer process and houses about 67 billion transistors. Desktop computers with Mac Studio on this SoC effortlessly handle resource-intensive projects that competing systems cannot even start. This is arguably one of the most powerful platforms for professional PCs focused on video rendering, animate graphic processing, and similar tasks.
In turn, M2 Ultra consists formally of two Apple M2 Max chips on the UltraFusion substrate. The "Ultra" has 16 performance and 8 efficient compute cores, 60 or 76 GPU cores, 32 NPU cores. The chip series is built on the second-generation 5-nanometer architecture and contains over 134 billion transistors. As for the allowable amount of unified memory — it reaches 192 GB with a bandwidth of 800 GB/s. The Mac Studio desktop computer on the M2 Ultra chip is twice as powerful as the M2 Max version, which is also by no means weak, being one of the most powerful solutions for PCs. The "Ultra" is designed for confident work with the most resource-intensive applications, ultra-high definition video processing up to 8K, heavy 3D rendering of animated graphics, and so on.
— Apple M3 / M3 Pro. The world's first computer processors made with TSMC's 3 nm process technology. The Apple M3 series debuted in the fall of 2023. The base M3 chip contains 25 billion transistors. The chip includes an eight-core central processor with four high-performance and four energy-efficient cores, as well as a new Dynamic Caching graphics architecture that allocates memory in real-time. Along with this, the Apple M3 graphics processor features hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shaders — all of which improve the geometry rendering in games and applications, allowing for faster drawing of more complex scenes. The processor supports up to 24 GB of unified memory and one external display (in addition to the one built into the iMac). Altogether, these innovations make the M3 family about 10 – 20% faster than M2, and 45 – 65% more productive than the M1 generation.
In the Pro version, the system has a 12-core central processor with an equal number of performance and energy-efficient cores (6 each). It also employs an 18-core CPU with hardware-accelerated ray tracing and a new Dynamic Caching graphics architecture. Apple M3 Pro contains about 37 billion transistors, with configurations available with up to 36 GB of unified memory.
— Apple M4 / M4 Pro. M4 — the base processor from the SoC line from Apple, released in the spring of 2024. Belongs to mobile solutions, applied in flagship tablets, laptops, mini-PCs, and all-in-ones from Apple. The M4 processor is manufactured using TSMC's second-generation 3-nanometer technology, contains up to 10 CPU compute cores (4 performance + 6 energy-efficient) and up to 10 GPU cores with ray tracing support. Unified memory can be from 16 to 32 GB, with a bandwidth of 120 GB/s. Unified memory serves as operational and video memory. The processor also includes a 16-core neural engine with performance up to 38 TOPS (trillion operations per second). In addition to the aforementioned improvements, energy efficiency has been significantly increased in the Apple M4 (about 50% compared to the M2 chip).
Compared to the base M4 processor, the Pro modification stands out for twice the performance of the built-in graphics and high-speed RAM. The SoC foundation is based on the improved 3-nanometer TSMC process — N3E. The processor contains up to 14 CPU cores (10 high-performance and 4 energy-efficient in the maximum configuration), up to 20 GPU cores with ray tracing support, has a Neural Engine block to accelerate artificial intelligence operations, and implements support for Apple Intelligence AI functions. Moreover, the system supports up to 64 GB of high-speed unified memory with a bandwidth of 273 GB/s (can be used as operational and video memory). Additionally, Thunderbolt v5 interface support is noted with data exchange speeds of up to 120 Gbps. Apple M4 Pro processors provide excellent graphics processing and video rendering performance, increasingly found in Mac mini net-tops and MacBook Pro laptops.
In addition to the series described above, such processors can also be found in modern PCs:
— AMD Fusion A4. The entire Fusion processor family was originally created as devices with integrated graphics, combining a central processor and a video card in one chip; such chips are called APU — Accelerated Processing Unit. Series with the "A" index are equipped with the most powerful embedded graphics within the family, capable in some cases of competing on equal footing with low-cost discrete graphics cards. The higher the digit in the series index, the more advanced it is; A4 is the most modest series among Fusion A.
— AMD Fusion A6. A series of processors from the Fusion A line, relatively modest, but somewhat more advanced than the A4. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A8. A fairly advanced series of Fusion A processors, a mid-range option between the comparatively modest A4 and A6 and the high-class A10 and A12. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A9. Another advanced series from the Fusion A family, inferior only to the A10 and A12 series. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A10. One of the top series in the Fusion A lineup. For general features of this line, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A12. The top series in the APU Fusion A lineup, introduced in 2015; positioned as professional-level processors with enhanced (even by APU standards) graphics capabilities. For general features of the Fusion A line, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD E-Series. This series of processors is related to APU, like the Fusion A described above, but fundamentally differs in specialization: the main application field of the E-Series is compact devices, mainly net-tops in PCs (see "Type"). Accordingly, these processors are characterized by compactness, low heat generation, and power consumption, but their computing power is also low.
— Athlon X4. A series of budget consumer-level processors, initially released in 2015 as relatively inexpensive yet comparatively productive solutions for the FM+ socket.
— AMD G. A family of ultra-compact and energy-efficient processors from AMD, made under the "system on crystal" (SoC) principle. Unlike many similar chips, it uses the x86 architecture, not ARM. It is positioned as a solution for devices with a focus on graphics, particularly gaming. However, we are not talking about gaming PCs; like most processors of similar "weight categories," the AMD G mainly appears in thin clients (see "Type").
— VIA. Processors from the company of the same name, mainly related to energy-efficient "mobile" solutions—in particular, many VIA models are directly compared to Intel's Atom. However, despite the modest performance, such CPUs are even found among desktop systems; in the future, the company plans to create full-fledged desktop chips to compete with AMD and Intel.
— ARM Cortex-A. A group of processors from ARM, the creator of the architecture of the same name and the largest manufacturer of chips based on it. The distinguishing feature of this microarchitecture compared to the classic x86 is the so-called reduced instruction set (RISC): the processor works with a simplified instruction set. This slightly limits functionality but allows the production of more compact, "cool" yet still high-performance chips. For several reasons, the ARM architecture is mainly used in "mobile" processors designed for smartphones, tablets, etc. This is also true for the ARM Cortex-A series; such CPUs are rarely installed in PCs and are usually part of a compact, modest device like a "thin client" (see "Type").
— nVidia Tegra. Originally, these processors were created for portable devices but have recently started being installed in PCs, primarily all-in-ones. They are "system-on-chip" devices, using the "mobile" ARM architecture rather than the "desktop" x86, requiring appropriate operating systems; Android is most often used (see "Pre-installed OS").
— Armada. Another type of processor on the ARM architecture, positioned as high-performance solutions for "cloud" computing and home servers, including NAS. It is found in single models of "thin clients" (see "Type").
— Tera. A specialized family of processors designed specifically for "thin clients" (see "Type") and fundamentally different from classical CPUs (both full-sized and compact). Systems based on Tera usually represent complete "zero clients," absolutely incapable of autonomous operation. In other words, they are devices intended for creating a "virtual desktop": the user operates with the terminal interface and equipment (monitor, keyboard, mouse, etc.), but all operations occur on the server. This ensures increased security when working with confidential data. However, in more traditional PCs, Tera processors are practically never used.
Of the obsolete series of processors still in use (but not sold), one can mention Sempron, Phenom II, and Athlon II from AMD, as well as Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo from Intel.
It should be noted that configurations without a processor can be found on sale — expecting the user to select one independently; however, this is a rather rare option.
In general, each series includes processors of different generations, similar in overall level and positioning. Here is a more detailed description of each of the variants mentioned above:
— Atom. Processors originally designed for mobile devices. They are compact, highly energy-efficient, and low in heat output, but do not "shine" with performance. They are well-suited for microcomputers (see "Type"), and are extremely rare in more "large-format" systems—mainly in the most modest configurations.
— Celeron. Budget-level processors, the simplest and cheapest consumer desktop chips from Intel, with corresponding characteristics.
— Pentium. A family of budget desktop processors from Intel, somewhat more advanced than Celeron, but inferior to models from the Core i* series.
— Core i3. The simplest and cheapest series among Intel's Core desktop chips, includes budget and low-end mid-range chips, which, nevertheless, surpass Celerons and Pentiums in terms of specifications.
— Core i5. A mid-range family among Intel Core processors; indeed, these chips are considered mid-level by desktop standards.
— Core i7. A series of high-performance processors that were long the top of the Core chips; it wasn't until 2017 that they ceded this position to the i9 family. However, having an i7 processor still means a rather powerful and advanced configuration; in particular, such CPUs are found in premium all-in-one computers and are quite popular in gaming systems.
— Core i9. The top series among Intel's general-purpose desktop chips, the most powerful in the Core lineup. In particular, even the most modest models have at least 6 cores. These chips are mainly used in gaming PCs.
— Xeon. High-end Intel processors that go beyond standard desktop chip capabilities. They are designed for specialized applications, appearing primarily in powerful workstations.
— AMD FX. A family of processors from AMD, positioned as high-performance yet affordable solutions — including for gaming systems. Interestingly, some models come with liquid cooling in the purchase package.
— Ryzen 3. AMD Ryzen chips (of all series) are promoted as high-class solutions for gamers, developers, graphic designers, and video editors. AMD was the first to use the Zen microarchitecture with simultaneous multithreading, significantly increasing the number of operations per clock at the same clock frequency. Ryzen 3 is the most affordable and modestly featured family among the Ryzens. These processors are manufactured using the same technology as the upper series, but Ryzen 3 has half of its compute cores deactivated. Nevertheless, this line includes fairly productive models designed for gaming configurations and workstations.
— Ryzen 5. A mid-level family among Ryzen processors. The second series on this architecture, released in April 2017 as a more affordable alternative to Ryzen 7 chips. Ryzen 5 chips have slightly less impressive working characteristics (in particular, lower clock frequencies and, for some models, less L3 cache). Otherwise, they are completely similar to the "sevens" and also qualify as high-performance chips for gaming and workstations.
— Ryzen 7. Historically the first series of AMD processors on the Zen microarchitecture (see "Ryzen 3" above for details). One of the senior families among the Ryzens, outperforming only the Threadripper line; many PCs based on these chips are gaming-oriented.
— Ryzen 9. AMD Ryzen 9 processors debuted on the Zen microarchitecture in 2019. This series became the top of all Ryzens, pushing Ryzen 7 from the pinnacle of honor. The first models of Ryzen 9 had 12 cores and 24 threads, with later ones increasing to 16 and 32 respectively. The processors in this line are traditionally used for professional tasks (design, video editing, 3D rendering), gaming, streaming, and other high-load applications.
— Ryzen Threadripper. High-end specialized processors designed for maximum performance. Installed mainly in gaming systems and workstations.
— Apple M1. A series of processors from Apple introduced in November 2020. They fall under mobile solutions (see "Type" above) and follow the system-on-chip scheme: a single module combines the CPU, graphics adapter, RAM (in the first models — 8 or 16 GB), a solid-state NVMe drive, and some other components (specifically, Thunderbolt 4 controllers). Among PCs, these chips are primarily used in compact net-tops. As for specifications, the initial M1 configurations are equipped with 8 cores — 4 performance and 4 energy-efficient; the latter, according to the creators, consume 10 times less energy than the former. Combined with a 5 nm process technology, this has achieved very high energy efficiency and performance at the same time.
— Apple M1 Max. An uncompromisingly powerful SoC aimed at ensuring maximum labor productivity for Apple's desktop computers when performing complex tasks. The Apple M1 Max lineup was introduced in the fall of 2021, debuting on Mac Studio computers. The Apple M1 Max consists of 10 cores: 8 performance and 2 energy-efficient. The maximum volume of built-in unified memory reaches 64 GB, with a bandwidth cap of 400 GB/s. The graphical performance of the Max-version of the single-chip system M1 is roughly twice that of the Apple M1 Pro. The chip contains over 57 billion transistors. Its design also incorporates an additional accelerator for the professional ProRes video codec, allowing multiple high-quality ProRes video streams in 4K and 8K resolutions to be easily reproduced.
— Apple M1 Ultra. Formally, the M1 Ultra chip consists of two Apple M1 Max processors on a single UltraFusion substrate, enabling data transfer speeds of up to 2.5 Tbps. In "dry" numerical terms, this bundle comprises 20 compute ARM cores (16 high-performance and 4 energy-efficient), a 64-core graphics subsystem, and a 32-core neural computing block. The system on a chip supports up to 128 GB of unified memory. The processor housing accommodates around 114 billion transistors. The main purpose of the Apple M1 Ultra is confident work with complex resource-intensive applications such as 8K video editing or 3D rendering. In practice< the processor can be found onboard Mac Studio desktop computers.
— Apple M2 / M2 Pro. The second edition of the M-series processors from Apple, released in early summer 2022. M2 chips are produced using an updated 5 nm process and house a quarter more transistors than the Apple M1 processor generation. Architecturally, their CPU block consists of four high-performance and four energy-efficient cores. The graphics accelerator has a 10-core structure. The Apple M2 uses a neural engine and also adds a powerful ProRes video engine for hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding up to 8K resolution. External 6K display support is claimed for the M2 generation.
The M2 Pro SoC aims to scale the M2 architecture. It contains approximately 40 billion transistors and is built with 5-nanometer technology. The system features a 10- or 12-core central processor, up to 19 graphics cores, 16 or 32 GB of unified memory used as both operational and video memory. The graphics performance of the M2 Pro provides high-speed image processing and video rendering. These processors can be found in Apple Mac mini computers.
— Apple M2 Max / Ultra. High-performance SoCs for dealing with resource-intensive tasks, debuting in early summer 2023. The M2 Max chip systems have up to 12 central processor cores (8 performance and 4 energy-efficient compute cores), come with 30 graphics cores, and support up to 96 GB of unified memory with a bandwidth of up to 400 Gbps. They also include a fast 16-core neural engine, powerful multimedia engine, two video encoding modules, and two ProRes modules. The processor is manufactured using a 5-nanometer process and houses about 67 billion transistors. Desktop computers with Mac Studio on this SoC effortlessly handle resource-intensive projects that competing systems cannot even start. This is arguably one of the most powerful platforms for professional PCs focused on video rendering, animate graphic processing, and similar tasks.
In turn, M2 Ultra consists formally of two Apple M2 Max chips on the UltraFusion substrate. The "Ultra" has 16 performance and 8 efficient compute cores, 60 or 76 GPU cores, 32 NPU cores. The chip series is built on the second-generation 5-nanometer architecture and contains over 134 billion transistors. As for the allowable amount of unified memory — it reaches 192 GB with a bandwidth of 800 GB/s. The Mac Studio desktop computer on the M2 Ultra chip is twice as powerful as the M2 Max version, which is also by no means weak, being one of the most powerful solutions for PCs. The "Ultra" is designed for confident work with the most resource-intensive applications, ultra-high definition video processing up to 8K, heavy 3D rendering of animated graphics, and so on.
— Apple M3 / M3 Pro. The world's first computer processors made with TSMC's 3 nm process technology. The Apple M3 series debuted in the fall of 2023. The base M3 chip contains 25 billion transistors. The chip includes an eight-core central processor with four high-performance and four energy-efficient cores, as well as a new Dynamic Caching graphics architecture that allocates memory in real-time. Along with this, the Apple M3 graphics processor features hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shaders — all of which improve the geometry rendering in games and applications, allowing for faster drawing of more complex scenes. The processor supports up to 24 GB of unified memory and one external display (in addition to the one built into the iMac). Altogether, these innovations make the M3 family about 10 – 20% faster than M2, and 45 – 65% more productive than the M1 generation.
In the Pro version, the system has a 12-core central processor with an equal number of performance and energy-efficient cores (6 each). It also employs an 18-core CPU with hardware-accelerated ray tracing and a new Dynamic Caching graphics architecture. Apple M3 Pro contains about 37 billion transistors, with configurations available with up to 36 GB of unified memory.
— Apple M4 / M4 Pro. M4 — the base processor from the SoC line from Apple, released in the spring of 2024. Belongs to mobile solutions, applied in flagship tablets, laptops, mini-PCs, and all-in-ones from Apple. The M4 processor is manufactured using TSMC's second-generation 3-nanometer technology, contains up to 10 CPU compute cores (4 performance + 6 energy-efficient) and up to 10 GPU cores with ray tracing support. Unified memory can be from 16 to 32 GB, with a bandwidth of 120 GB/s. Unified memory serves as operational and video memory. The processor also includes a 16-core neural engine with performance up to 38 TOPS (trillion operations per second). In addition to the aforementioned improvements, energy efficiency has been significantly increased in the Apple M4 (about 50% compared to the M2 chip).
Compared to the base M4 processor, the Pro modification stands out for twice the performance of the built-in graphics and high-speed RAM. The SoC foundation is based on the improved 3-nanometer TSMC process — N3E. The processor contains up to 14 CPU cores (10 high-performance and 4 energy-efficient in the maximum configuration), up to 20 GPU cores with ray tracing support, has a Neural Engine block to accelerate artificial intelligence operations, and implements support for Apple Intelligence AI functions. Moreover, the system supports up to 64 GB of high-speed unified memory with a bandwidth of 273 GB/s (can be used as operational and video memory). Additionally, Thunderbolt v5 interface support is noted with data exchange speeds of up to 120 Gbps. Apple M4 Pro processors provide excellent graphics processing and video rendering performance, increasingly found in Mac mini net-tops and MacBook Pro laptops.
In addition to the series described above, such processors can also be found in modern PCs:
— AMD Fusion A4. The entire Fusion processor family was originally created as devices with integrated graphics, combining a central processor and a video card in one chip; such chips are called APU — Accelerated Processing Unit. Series with the "A" index are equipped with the most powerful embedded graphics within the family, capable in some cases of competing on equal footing with low-cost discrete graphics cards. The higher the digit in the series index, the more advanced it is; A4 is the most modest series among Fusion A.
— AMD Fusion A6. A series of processors from the Fusion A line, relatively modest, but somewhat more advanced than the A4. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A8. A fairly advanced series of Fusion A processors, a mid-range option between the comparatively modest A4 and A6 and the high-class A10 and A12. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A9. Another advanced series from the Fusion A family, inferior only to the A10 and A12 series. For general features of all Fusion A, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A10. One of the top series in the Fusion A lineup. For general features of this line, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD Fusion A12. The top series in the APU Fusion A lineup, introduced in 2015; positioned as professional-level processors with enhanced (even by APU standards) graphics capabilities. For general features of the Fusion A line, see "AMD Fusion A4" above.
— AMD E-Series. This series of processors is related to APU, like the Fusion A described above, but fundamentally differs in specialization: the main application field of the E-Series is compact devices, mainly net-tops in PCs (see "Type"). Accordingly, these processors are characterized by compactness, low heat generation, and power consumption, but their computing power is also low.
— Athlon X4. A series of budget consumer-level processors, initially released in 2015 as relatively inexpensive yet comparatively productive solutions for the FM+ socket.
— AMD G. A family of ultra-compact and energy-efficient processors from AMD, made under the "system on crystal" (SoC) principle. Unlike many similar chips, it uses the x86 architecture, not ARM. It is positioned as a solution for devices with a focus on graphics, particularly gaming. However, we are not talking about gaming PCs; like most processors of similar "weight categories," the AMD G mainly appears in thin clients (see "Type").
— VIA. Processors from the company of the same name, mainly related to energy-efficient "mobile" solutions—in particular, many VIA models are directly compared to Intel's Atom. However, despite the modest performance, such CPUs are even found among desktop systems; in the future, the company plans to create full-fledged desktop chips to compete with AMD and Intel.
— ARM Cortex-A. A group of processors from ARM, the creator of the architecture of the same name and the largest manufacturer of chips based on it. The distinguishing feature of this microarchitecture compared to the classic x86 is the so-called reduced instruction set (RISC): the processor works with a simplified instruction set. This slightly limits functionality but allows the production of more compact, "cool" yet still high-performance chips. For several reasons, the ARM architecture is mainly used in "mobile" processors designed for smartphones, tablets, etc. This is also true for the ARM Cortex-A series; such CPUs are rarely installed in PCs and are usually part of a compact, modest device like a "thin client" (see "Type").
— nVidia Tegra. Originally, these processors were created for portable devices but have recently started being installed in PCs, primarily all-in-ones. They are "system-on-chip" devices, using the "mobile" ARM architecture rather than the "desktop" x86, requiring appropriate operating systems; Android is most often used (see "Pre-installed OS").
— Armada. Another type of processor on the ARM architecture, positioned as high-performance solutions for "cloud" computing and home servers, including NAS. It is found in single models of "thin clients" (see "Type").
— Tera. A specialized family of processors designed specifically for "thin clients" (see "Type") and fundamentally different from classical CPUs (both full-sized and compact). Systems based on Tera usually represent complete "zero clients," absolutely incapable of autonomous operation. In other words, they are devices intended for creating a "virtual desktop": the user operates with the terminal interface and equipment (monitor, keyboard, mouse, etc.), but all operations occur on the server. This ensures increased security when working with confidential data. However, in more traditional PCs, Tera processors are practically never used.
Of the obsolete series of processors still in use (but not sold), one can mention Sempron, Phenom II, and Athlon II from AMD, as well as Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo from Intel.
It should be noted that configurations without a processor can be found on sale — expecting the user to select one independently; however, this is a rather rare option.
Model
The specific model of the processor installed in the PC, or rather, its index within its series (see "Processor"). The full model name consists of the series name and this index — for example, Intel Core i3 3220; knowing this name, you can find detailed information about the processor (characteristics, reviews, etc.) and determine how suitable it is for your purposes.
Speed
Clock speed of the CPU installed in the PC.
In theory, higher clock speeds have a positive effect on performance because they allow the CPU to perform more operations per unit of time. However, this indicator is rather weakly related to real productivity. The fact is that the actual capabilities of the CPU strongly depend on a number of other factors - the overall architecture, cache size, number of cores, support for special instructions, etc. As a result, you can compare by this indicator only chips from the same or similar series (see “CPU”), and ideally, also from the same generation. And that's pretty approximate.
In theory, higher clock speeds have a positive effect on performance because they allow the CPU to perform more operations per unit of time. However, this indicator is rather weakly related to real productivity. The fact is that the actual capabilities of the CPU strongly depend on a number of other factors - the overall architecture, cache size, number of cores, support for special instructions, etc. As a result, you can compare by this indicator only chips from the same or similar series (see “CPU”), and ideally, also from the same generation. And that's pretty approximate.
TurboBoost / TurboCore
Processor clock speed when running in TurboBoost or TurboCore mode.
Turbo Boost technology is used in Intel processors, Turbo Core — AMD. The essence of this technology is the same both there and there: if some of the cores work under high load, and some are idle, then some tasks are transferred from more loaded cores to less loaded ones, which improves performance. This usually increases the clock frequency of the processor; this value is indicated in this paragraph. See above for more information on clock speed in general.
Turbo Boost technology is used in Intel processors, Turbo Core — AMD. The essence of this technology is the same both there and there: if some of the cores work under high load, and some are idle, then some tasks are transferred from more loaded cores to less loaded ones, which improves performance. This usually increases the clock frequency of the processor; this value is indicated in this paragraph. See above for more information on clock speed in general.
Speed
The clock speed of the RAM that comes with the PC. This is one of the parameters that determine the capabilities of RAM: with the same amount and type of memory (see above), a higher clock frequency will mean faster performance. However such details are rarely required by an ordinary user, but they are important for enthusiasts and professionals.
Also note that this indicator can be used to determine the possibilities for upgrading the system: the motherboard will be able to work normally with brackets that have the same or lower clock frequency, but compatibility with faster memory should be specified separately.
Also note that this indicator can be used to determine the possibilities for upgrading the system: the motherboard will be able to work normally with brackets that have the same or lower clock frequency, but compatibility with faster memory should be specified separately.
Graphics card model
The main manufacturers of video cards nowadays are AMD, NVIDIA and Intel, and each has its own specifics. NVIDIA produces primarily discrete solutions; Among the most common are the GeForce MX1xx, GeForce MX3xx, GeForce GTX 10xx series (in particular GTX 1050, GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1060), GeForce GTX 16xx, GeForce RTX 20xx, GeForce RTX 30xx( GeForce RTX 3060, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, GeForce RTX 3070, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, GeForce RTX 3080, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GeForce RTX 3090, GeForce RTX 3090 Ti), GeForce RTX 4060 , GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, GeForce RTX 4070, GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, Ge Force RTX 4080..., GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, GeForce RTX 4090, GeForce RTX 5050, GeForce RTX 5060, GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, GeForce RTX 5070, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, GeForce RTX 5080, GeForce RTX 5090. AMD offers both discrete and integrated graphics - including the popular Radeon RX 6000, Radeon RX 7000, Radeon RX 9000. And Intel deals exclusively with modules integrated into processors of its own production - these can be HD Graphics, UHD Graphics and Iris.
Note that many configurations with discrete graphics also have an integrated graphics module; in such cases, the name of the discrete video card is indicated as more advanced.
Note that many configurations with discrete graphics also have an integrated graphics module; in such cases, the name of the discrete video card is indicated as more advanced.
Graphics memory
The amount of native memory provided by the discrete graphics card (see "Graphics card type").
The larger this volume, the more powerful and advanced the video adapter is, the better it handles with complex tasks and, accordingly, the more expensive it is. Nowadays, 2 GB and 3 GB are considered quite modest, 4 GB are not bad, 6 GB and 8 GB are very solid, and more than 8 GB means that we have a specialized PC built for maximum graphics performance.
The larger this volume, the more powerful and advanced the video adapter is, the better it handles with complex tasks and, accordingly, the more expensive it is. Nowadays, 2 GB and 3 GB are considered quite modest, 4 GB are not bad, 6 GB and 8 GB are very solid, and more than 8 GB means that we have a specialized PC built for maximum graphics performance.
Drive type
The type of storage device that is installed in the computer.
Note that many PCs allow you to add a complete drive or even completely replace it, but it is more convenient to buy a suitable configuration initially and not bother with re-equipment. In terms of types, traditional hard disk drives ( HDD) are increasingly losing ground to SSD solid-state modules nowadays. In addition, HDD + SSD combinations are quite popular (including those using advanced Intel Optane and Fusion Drive technologies). But solutions such as SSHD and eMMC have practically fallen into disuse. Let's take a closer look at these options:
— HDD. Classic hard disk. The key advantage of such drives is their low cost per unit of volume — this allows you to create capacious and at the same time inexpensive storage. On the other hand, HDDs are noticeably inferior to SSDs in terms of speed, and they also do not tolerate shocks and shocks. Thus, this type of media is less and less used in its pure form — it is much more common to find a combination of a hard drive with an SSD module (see below).
— SSD. Solid state drives based on flash memory. With the same volume, an SSD is much more expensive than an HDD, but this is justified by a number of advantages. First, such drives are much faster than hard drives; specific p...erformance may be different (depending on the type of memory, connection interface, etc.), however, even inexpensive SSDs outperform advanced HDDs in this indicator. Secondly, solid-state memory has no moving parts, which offers several advantages at once: lightness, compactness, shock insensitivity and low power consumption. And the cost of such memory is constantly decreasing as technology advances. So more and more modern PCs are equipped with just such drives, and these can be configurations of any level — from low-cost to top ones.
— HDD+SSD. The presence in one system of two drives at once — HDD and SSD. Each of these varieties is described in more detail above; and their combination in one system allows you to combine the advantages and partially compensate for the shortcomings. For example, an SSD (which usually has a fairly small capacity) can store system files and other data for which speed of access is important (for example, work applications); and HDD is well suited for large volumes of information that do not require particularly high speed (a typical case is video files and other multimedia content). In addition, the solid-state module can be used not as a separate storage, but as an intermediate cache to speed up the hard drive; however, this usually requires special software settings (whereas the "two separate drives" mode is most often available by default).
We also emphasize that in this case we are talking about “ordinary” SSD modules that do not belong to the Optane and Fusion Drive series; the features of these series are detailed below.
HDD + Optane. Combination of a traditional hard drive with an Intel Optane series SSD. For more information about the general features of this combination, see "HDD + SSD" above. Here, we note that “optains” differ from other SSD drives in a special three-dimensional structure of memory cells (3D Xpoint technology). This allows you to access data at the level of individual cells and do without some additional operations, which speeds up the speed and reduces latency, and also has a positive effect on memory life. The second difference is that Optane is usually used not as a separate drive, but as an auxiliary buffer (cache) for the main hard drive, designed to increase speed. Both drives are perceived by the system as a single device. The disadvantage of this type of SSD is traditional — a rather high cost; it is also worth noting that its superiority is most noticeable at relatively low loads (although it does not disappear completely with increasing load).
— HDD + Fusion Drive. A kind of HDD + SSD bundle (see above), used exclusively in Apple computers and optimized for the proprietary macOS operating system. However, it would be more correct to compare this option with the “HDD + Optane” combination (also described above): for example, both drives are perceived by the system as a single unit, and the Fusion Drive module is also used as a high-speed cache for the hard drive. However, there are also significant differences. Firstly, Fusion Drive has significant volumes and is used not only as a service buffer, but also as part of a full-fledged drive — for permanent data storage. Secondly, the total volume of the entire bundle approximately corresponds to the sum of the volumes of both drives (minus a couple of "service" gigabytes). This type of drive is expensive, but the efficiency and convenience are well worth the price.
— SSHD. The so-called hybrid drive: a device that combines a hard drive and a small SSD cache in one case. Some time ago, this solution was quite popular, but now it is almost never found, having been supplanted by a more practical option — various types of HDD + SSD.
— eMMC. A type of solid-state memory originally developed for portable gadgets such as smartphones and tablets. It differs from SSD, on the one hand, in lower cost and low power consumption, on the other hand, in relatively low speed and reliability. Because of this, this type of drive is used extremely rarely — in particular, in single models of microcomputers and thin clients (see "Type").
— HDD + eMMC. Combination of hard disk drive (HDD) and eMMC solid state module. These types of drives are described in detail above; here we note that this option is extremely rare, and in rather specific devices — monoblocks (see "Type") with a transformer function, where the screen is a removable tablet that can be used autonomously. In such a tablet, an eMMC module is usually installed, and a hard drive is placed in the stationary part. However, another option is also possible — a bundle similar to HDD + SSD (see above), where eMMC is used to reduce cost and/or power consumption.
— SSD + eMMC. Another combination of the two types of drives described above. It was used in single monoblocks and nettops — mainly to reduce the cost; Today, this variant is almost non-existent.
Note that many PCs allow you to add a complete drive or even completely replace it, but it is more convenient to buy a suitable configuration initially and not bother with re-equipment. In terms of types, traditional hard disk drives ( HDD) are increasingly losing ground to SSD solid-state modules nowadays. In addition, HDD + SSD combinations are quite popular (including those using advanced Intel Optane and Fusion Drive technologies). But solutions such as SSHD and eMMC have practically fallen into disuse. Let's take a closer look at these options:
— HDD. Classic hard disk. The key advantage of such drives is their low cost per unit of volume — this allows you to create capacious and at the same time inexpensive storage. On the other hand, HDDs are noticeably inferior to SSDs in terms of speed, and they also do not tolerate shocks and shocks. Thus, this type of media is less and less used in its pure form — it is much more common to find a combination of a hard drive with an SSD module (see below).
— SSD. Solid state drives based on flash memory. With the same volume, an SSD is much more expensive than an HDD, but this is justified by a number of advantages. First, such drives are much faster than hard drives; specific p...erformance may be different (depending on the type of memory, connection interface, etc.), however, even inexpensive SSDs outperform advanced HDDs in this indicator. Secondly, solid-state memory has no moving parts, which offers several advantages at once: lightness, compactness, shock insensitivity and low power consumption. And the cost of such memory is constantly decreasing as technology advances. So more and more modern PCs are equipped with just such drives, and these can be configurations of any level — from low-cost to top ones.
— HDD+SSD. The presence in one system of two drives at once — HDD and SSD. Each of these varieties is described in more detail above; and their combination in one system allows you to combine the advantages and partially compensate for the shortcomings. For example, an SSD (which usually has a fairly small capacity) can store system files and other data for which speed of access is important (for example, work applications); and HDD is well suited for large volumes of information that do not require particularly high speed (a typical case is video files and other multimedia content). In addition, the solid-state module can be used not as a separate storage, but as an intermediate cache to speed up the hard drive; however, this usually requires special software settings (whereas the "two separate drives" mode is most often available by default).
We also emphasize that in this case we are talking about “ordinary” SSD modules that do not belong to the Optane and Fusion Drive series; the features of these series are detailed below.
HDD + Optane. Combination of a traditional hard drive with an Intel Optane series SSD. For more information about the general features of this combination, see "HDD + SSD" above. Here, we note that “optains” differ from other SSD drives in a special three-dimensional structure of memory cells (3D Xpoint technology). This allows you to access data at the level of individual cells and do without some additional operations, which speeds up the speed and reduces latency, and also has a positive effect on memory life. The second difference is that Optane is usually used not as a separate drive, but as an auxiliary buffer (cache) for the main hard drive, designed to increase speed. Both drives are perceived by the system as a single device. The disadvantage of this type of SSD is traditional — a rather high cost; it is also worth noting that its superiority is most noticeable at relatively low loads (although it does not disappear completely with increasing load).
— HDD + Fusion Drive. A kind of HDD + SSD bundle (see above), used exclusively in Apple computers and optimized for the proprietary macOS operating system. However, it would be more correct to compare this option with the “HDD + Optane” combination (also described above): for example, both drives are perceived by the system as a single unit, and the Fusion Drive module is also used as a high-speed cache for the hard drive. However, there are also significant differences. Firstly, Fusion Drive has significant volumes and is used not only as a service buffer, but also as part of a full-fledged drive — for permanent data storage. Secondly, the total volume of the entire bundle approximately corresponds to the sum of the volumes of both drives (minus a couple of "service" gigabytes). This type of drive is expensive, but the efficiency and convenience are well worth the price.
— SSHD. The so-called hybrid drive: a device that combines a hard drive and a small SSD cache in one case. Some time ago, this solution was quite popular, but now it is almost never found, having been supplanted by a more practical option — various types of HDD + SSD.
— eMMC. A type of solid-state memory originally developed for portable gadgets such as smartphones and tablets. It differs from SSD, on the one hand, in lower cost and low power consumption, on the other hand, in relatively low speed and reliability. Because of this, this type of drive is used extremely rarely — in particular, in single models of microcomputers and thin clients (see "Type").
— HDD + eMMC. Combination of hard disk drive (HDD) and eMMC solid state module. These types of drives are described in detail above; here we note that this option is extremely rare, and in rather specific devices — monoblocks (see "Type") with a transformer function, where the screen is a removable tablet that can be used autonomously. In such a tablet, an eMMC module is usually installed, and a hard drive is placed in the stationary part. However, another option is also possible — a bundle similar to HDD + SSD (see above), where eMMC is used to reduce cost and/or power consumption.
— SSD + eMMC. Another combination of the two types of drives described above. It was used in single monoblocks and nettops — mainly to reduce the cost; Today, this variant is almost non-existent.













