USA
Catalog   /   Photo   /   Camera Lenses

Comparison Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S III vs Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM

Add to comparison
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S III
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IIICanon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM
Compare prices 8Compare prices 5
TOP sellers
System
Canon
Canon
Mount
Canon EF-S
Canon EF-S
Specs
Focal length
18 - 55 mm /29 – 88 mm with APS-C matrices/
18 - 55 mm /29 – 88 mm with APS-C matrices/
Aperture valuef/3.5 - f/5.6f/3.5 - f/5.6
Viewing angles64° 30' - 23° 20', 45° 30'- 15° 40', 74° 20' - 27° 50'64° 30' - 23° 20', 45° 30'- 15° 40', 74° 20' - 27° 50'
Min. diaphragm2222
Minimum focus distance0.25 m0.25 m
Maximum zoom0.340.36
Design
Sensor sizeAPS-CAPS-C
Autofocus drivemotor
stepper motor /stepper/
Image stabilization
 /4-speed/
Design (elements/groups)11 elements in 9 groups13 elements in 11 groups
Number of diaphragm blades67
Filter diameter58 mm58 mm
Dimensions (diameter/length)69x70 mm69x75.2 mm
Weight200 g205 g
Added to E-Catalogjuly 2014july 2014

Maximum zoom

The degree of magnification of the object being shot when using a lens for macro shooting (that is, shooting small objects at the maximum possible approximation, when the distance to the subject is measured in millimetres). The degree of magnification in this case means the ratio of the size of the image of the object obtained on the matrix of the camera to the actual size of the object being shot. For example, with an object size of 15 mm and a magnification factor of 0.3, the image of this object on the matrix will have a size of 15x0.3=4.5 mm. With the same matrix size, the larger the magnification factor, the larger the image size of the object on the matrix, the more pixels fall on this object, respectively, the clearer the resulting image, the more details it can convey and the better the lens is suitable for macro photography. It is believed that in order to obtain macro shots of relatively acceptable quality, the magnification factor should be at least 0.25 – 0.3.

Autofocus drive

A type of drive that ensures the movement of lens structural elements during automatic focus. Currently, the following types can be used:

Ultrasonic motor. The most advanced type of drive to date. Ultrasonic motors are much faster than conventional motors, provide higher accuracy, consume less power and are virtually silent. However, their cost is quite high.

Stepper motor. Drive control focal length and zoom (zoom). This type of motor is used for the most part only in full-size digital cameras. Among the advantages of a stepper motor, one can note: high reliability and accuracy of operation; in addition, it does not require power supply to maintain focus and zoom. Of course, stepper motors are not without drawbacks. Among the minuses can be identified: slow speed and increased noise. Additionally, a stepper motor is characterized by large dimensions and a rather large weight, which physically does not allow this type of drive to be integrated into the optics of mobile phones and ultra-compact cameras.

— Motor. In this case, an electric motor of a traditional design is meant. Such drives are simple and, as a result, inexpensive. Their disadvantages are the relatively low speed of operation, as well as the noise produced during this; the latter can sometimes be critical — for example, when shooting wildlife. Recently, designers have been us...ing various tricks to neutralize these shortcomings, but in general, the characteristics of conventional motors still remain relatively modest.

— Is absent. The complete absence of an autofocus motor in the lens. Focus such optics can be carried out either by the “screwdriver” system, or strictly manually (for more details on both options, see below).

Image stabilization

The presence in the lens of its own image stabilization system. Such a system includes gyroscopes and movable lenses that compensate for small tremors of the lens and prevent the appearance of “shake”. Stabilization is especially relevant when shooting handheld, especially at slow shutter speeds and/or at long distances with high magnification: it is in such conditions that “shake” affects the quality of the image the most. At the same time, it should be taken into account that the presence of a stabilizer significantly affects the weight, dimensions and, above all, the price of optics; at the same time, some modern cameras have their own stabilization systems (due to matrix shift). Therefore, it makes sense to choose a lens with this function in the case when maximum protection against “shake” is of fundamental importance.

Design (elements/groups)

The number of elements (in fact, the number of lenses) included in the design of the lens, as well as the number of groups in which these elements are combined. Usually, the more elements provided in the design, the better the lens handles with distortions (aberrations) when light passes through it. On the other hand, numerous lenses increases the dimensions and weight of the optics, reduces light transmission (for more details, see "Aperture") and also puts forward increased requirements for the quality of processing, which affects the cost of the lens.

Number of diaphragm blades

The number of blades provided in the design of the diaphragm (for details, see "Minimum aperture"). In fact, this parameter is important when shooting scenes with pronounced bokeh (blurred background) and a small depth of field: the more petals the aperture has, the smoother the glare from out-of-focus objects will turn out, while with a small number of petals they can look like polygons. The number of aperture blades has almost no effect on other shooting parameters. Modern lenses have an average of 7-9 petals; the smoothing provided by them in most cases is considered quite sufficient.
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S III often compared
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM often compared