Cisco Meraki MS120-8
![]() |
Cisco Meraki MS120-8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Cisco 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Cisco.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Cisco 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Cisco.
Buy Cisco Meraki MS120-8
All prices 6 →When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may receive a affiliate commission.
Cisco MS120-8 | MS210-8 8 x Ports PoE+ 10/100/1000Base-T + 2 x SFP Ports Layer 2 Managed 1U Rack-mountable Gigabit Ethernet | $481.70 | ||||
Cisco Meraki MS120-8 Compact Switch MS120-8-HW | $499.95 | ||||
Meraki MS120-8 1G L2 Cloud Managed 8X GI - 8 Ports - Manageable - Gigabit Ethernet - 2 Layer Supported - Modular - 2 SFP Slo | $607.99 | ||||
Cisco MS120-8-HW-RF | Meraki 8 x Port 1GB RJ-45 2 x Port 1GB SFP Unclaimed Switch Refurbished MS120-8-HW-RF | $1,096.96 | ||||
Cisco MS120-8-HW | Meraki MS120-8 RJ-45 8xPort 10/100/1000Base-T + 2 x SFP Ports Uplink Layer 2 Managed Gigabit Ethernet Com | $1,096.96 | ||||
Cisco MS120-8-HW= | Meraki 8 x Port 1Gb RJ-45 2 x Port 1Gb SFP Unclaimed Switch Refurbished MS120-8-HW= | $1,096.96 | ||||
Cisco Meraki MS120-8 configurations
| Price for Cisco Meraki MS120-8 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki MS120-8 | from $481.70 | 6 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-8LP | from $300.70 | 4 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-8FP | from $392.35 | 4 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-24 | from $823.86 | 3 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-24P | from $264.29 | 6 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-48 | from $248.10 | 4 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-48LP | from $316.12 | 6 offers | ||
| Cisco Meraki MS120-48FP | from $385.00 | 3 offers | ||
Video reviews
We recommendCompare using chart →
























