Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G
![]() |
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Cisco 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Cisco.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Cisco 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Cisco.
Buy Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G
All prices 6 →When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may receive a affiliate commission.
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G-NA-RF | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Giga | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G-NA | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Gigabit | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G= | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Gigabit E | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Gigabit Et | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G-NA= | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Gigabi | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G-RF | Business 350 10 x SFP Ports PoE+ 1000Base-X 2 x RJ-45 Ports Layer 2 Managed Rack-mountable Gigabit | $428.16 | ||||
Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G configurations
| Price for Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco CBS350-8S-E-2G | from $428.16 | 6 offers | ||
| Cisco CBS350-8T-E-2G | from $283.79 | 7 offers | ||
| Cisco CBS350-8P-E-2G | from $361.19 | 5 offers | ||
| Cisco CBS350-8FP-E-2G | from $840.77 | 4 offers | ||
| Cisco CBS350-16T-E-2G | from $280.24 | 6 offers | ||
| Cisco CBS350-16P-E-2G | from $563.55 | 6 offers | ||
We recommendCompare using chart →










