Comparison powerbank

The higher the battery capacity, the more energy the power bank is able to accumulate and then transfer when charging to gadgets connected to it. But it should be borne in mind that not all of the accumulated energy goes specifically to charging – part of it is spent on service functions and inevitable losses in the process of transmission. So in the specifications, the real capacity of the power bank is also often specified. If there is no data on real capacity, then when calculating it is worth proceeding from the fact that it is usually somewhere 1.6 times lower than the nominal one. For example, for a model with a nominal capacity of 10,000 mAh, the actual value will be approximately 6300 mAh.

As for the specific values of the nominal capacity, then in models with the lowest performance it is 5000 – 7000 mAh and even less ; such power banks are suitable as a backup source of energy for 1 – 2 smartphone charging with a not very capacious battery or other similar gadget. The 10,000 mAh solutions are the most popular nowadays – in many cases, this option provides the best price-capacity ratio. The 20,000 mAh and 30,000 mAh options are also very common. But even a capacity of 40,000 mAh or more, thanks to the development of modern...technology, is quite common.

The real capacity of the power bank.

Real capacity is the amount of energy that a power bank is able to transfer to rechargeable gadgets. This amount is inevitably lower than the nominal capacity (see above) — most often by about 1.6 times (due to the fact that part of the energy goes to additional features and transmission losses). However, it is by real capacity that it is easiest to evaluate the actual capabilities of an external battery: for example, if this figure is 6500 mAh, this model is guaranteed to be enough for two full charges of a smartphone with a 3000 mAh battery and smartwatches for 250 mAh.

The capacity in this case is indicated for 5 V — the standard USB charging voltage. At the same time, the features of milliamp-hours as a unit of capacity are such that the actual amount of energy in the battery depends not only on the number of mAh, but also on the operating voltage. In fact, this means that when using fast charging technologies (see below) that involve increased voltage, the actual value of the actual capacity will differ from the claimed one (it will be lower). There are formulas and methods for calculating this value, they can be found in special sources.

The type of own batteries installed in the power bank. Lithium-ion(Li-Ion) or lithium-polymer(Li-Pol) batteries are most commonly used today. Other options are less common — solutions based on nickel-metal hydride(Ni-Mh) batteries, as well as on LiFePO4 type cells. In addition, a rather promising development has appeared relatively recently — graphene batteries; however, as of early 2021, they are just beginning to be introduced into mass production. Here are the main features of each of these varieties:

— Li-Ion. Lithium-ion technology allows you to create quite capacious batteries of small dimensions and weight. In addition, such elements are easy to use (the main operating parameters are regulated by the built-in controller), have a high charge speed and are practically not affected by the "memory effect" (reduction in capacity when charging an incompletely discharged battery). The main disadvantage of lithium-ion batteries is a rather narrow range of permissible ambient temperatures. This is not a problem in urban usage, when the power bank is used mainly indoors and is carried in a pocket or in a bag; but for less favorable conditions (such as long hikes in the cold season), it is worth choosing models with good thermal insulation. You can also find information that lithium-ion batteries are prone to fires and even explosions; however, this is usually due to...failures in the embedded controllers, and these controllers are also constantly being improved, and nowadays the risk of such an accident is so low that it can actually be neglected.

— Li-pol. Further development and improvement of the lithium-ion technology described above; the main difference is the use of a solid polymer electrolyte instead of a liquid one (hence the name). This made it possible to achieve even greater capacity without increasing the dimensions, as well as to reduce the potential for fires and explosions during abnormal operation. On the other hand, lithium-polymer batteries are somewhat more expensive than lithium-ion batteries and are even more sensitive to temperature disturbances.

— Ni-Mh. Nickel-metal hydride batteries are distinguished by their reliability and a wide range of permissible temperatures, however, with the same dimensions, they are inferior in capacity to lithium-ion (and even more to lithium-polymer) batteries, and they also require certain specific operating rules to be observed. In addition, it is worth noting that Ni-Mh technology is well suited for removable batteries. It is in this format that such batteries are most often used: power banks of the Ni-Mh format are usually adapters with slots for several replaceable elements of a standard size (for example, AA). In this case, usually, several corresponding removable batteries are included in the kit, however, if desired, they can be replaced with other elements — these can even be disposable batteries from the nearest store. Such an opportunity can turn out to be very useful if the power bank is out of juice at an unfortunate moment, but there is no way to charge it; in addition, worn-out batteries can be replaced with fresh ones without changing the entire device.

— Li-FePO4. Another modified version of the Li-Ion batteries described above, the so-called "lithium iron phosphate". The advantages of such cells over classical lithium-ion ones are, first of all, a stable discharge voltage (until the energy is exhausted), high peak power, long service life, resistance to low temperatures, stability and safety. In addition, due to the use of iron instead of cobalt, such batteries are also safer to manufacture and easier to dispose of. At the same time, they are noticeably inferior to the classic lithium-ion ones in terms of capacity, and they are more expensive, which is why they are rarely used.

— Graphene. Batteries based on graphene — a carbon film one atom thick. The battery itself consists of a set of such films, between which silicon plates are laid, and lithium cobaltate or magnesium oxide is used as an anode. This design provides a number of advantages over the earlier batteries described above. First, graphene technology provides a high charge density, which allows you to create capacious and at the same time light and compact batteries. Secondly, for the production of such batteries, fewer rare resources are needed than for the same lithium ones; and the production itself is more environmentally friendly. Thirdly, such batteries are not prone to overheating and explosions when overloaded or damaged. On the other hand, graphene power supplies take a long time to charge and are not durable. However, this technology is still developing, and in the future it is likely that these shortcomings will be eliminated — completely or at least partially.

The total number of USB type C ports for charging connected gadgets. By 2023, they have become very popular. However, power banks are equipped mainly with one output port of the corresponding format. Models with 2 USB type C outputs have not yet gained such popularity.

The total number of USB-A ports for charging connected gadgets. This type is gradually being replaced by USB type C, however, most models still use USB-A as the main output. This is also indicated by the number of corresponding ports. Classic are 2 USB-A outputs. However, there are also compact models for 1 output, and more impressive ones with 3 and 4 USB-A(even more).

The maximum power that the power bank, theoretically, is capable of delivering to one rechargeable device. Usually, this power is achieved under the condition that no other device is connected to the battery (although exceptions to this rule are possible). And if you have ports with different charging currents or support multiple fast charging technologies, this information is given for the most powerful output or technology.

For modern power banks, a power of 10 watts or less is considered quite low; among other things, it usually means that the device does not support fast charging. Nevertheless, such devices are inexpensive and often turn out to be quite sufficient for simple tasks; Therefore, there are many models with similar specs on the market. The power of 12 – 15 W is also relatively small, 18 W can be called the average level, 20 – 25 W and 30 – 50 W is already considered an advanced level and in some solutions this parameter may exceed 60 W.

In general, higher power output has a positive effect on charging speed, but in fact there are a number of nuances associated with this parameter. Firstly, not only the power bank, but also the gadget being charged should support the appropriate power — otherwise the speed of the process will be limited...by the specs of the gadget. Secondly, in order to use the full capabilities of the power bank, it may be necessary for it to be compatible with certain fast charging technologies (see "Fast Charging").

The type of input used to charge the power bank's own battery. Simply put, this paragraph indicates which connector on the cable you need to charge the power bank. At the same time, some models provide several inputs for charging at once, which simplifies the search for a cable. Also note that for models with a built-in power bank charging connector (see below), the type of this connector is specified separately.

Most often in modern power banks there are standard connectors microUSB, USB type C and/or Apple Lightning. A lot of accessories are produced for such connectors — cables, network and car chargers, adapters, etc.; so there is usually no difficulty in finding a source of energy. Less common are models with DC input, they are usually equipped with their own power supply (or at least a cable under such a connector). Here is a more detailed description of the different types of inputs:

— microUSB. A smaller version of the USB connector, still very popular in portable tech, despite the active spread of the more advanced USB type C. It has relatively modest capabilities — in particular, it does not allow the implementation of some advanced fast charging technologies. On the other hand, it is very easy to find a source of energy for such a connector: both modern and many of the frankly outdated cables and chargers are...suitable for it.

— USB type C. A miniature type of USB connector, positioned, among other things, as the successor to microUSB. The most noticeable improvement is the reversible design, which allows you not to worry about which side of the plug is inserted into the connector. However, in the case of power banks, this is not the only or even the main advantage: USB type C has more extensive capabilities, allows more powerful currents and use a wider range of fast charging technologies (and Power Delivery was originally created specifically for this connector). Note that in some models the same connector of this type can be used both as an input for charging the battery and as an output for charging external devices — moreover, with automatic switching between these modes.

— Apple Lightning. Initially, this connector is designed for portable gadgets made by Apple. However, in the case of power banks, it can also be found in third-party devices: the idea is that the presence of Lightning allows you to charge an external battery using a cable from an iPhone or iPad and eliminates the need to look for a separate wire. For a number of reasons, this charging input is rarely used as the only one, more often it is provided in addition to microUSB or USB type C (see above).

— DC input. DC is a standard covering several types of connectors at once. Their common feature is a signature round shape, but the diameter, rated voltage and power can be different. In this sense, such connectors are not as convenient as USB type C, Lightning and other generally accepted standards — with a DC socket, it is best to use a native power supply (usually it comes bundled right away), and finding a third-party power source can be a problem. On the other hand, inputs of this type have practically no power limitations, it is easier to achieve high power supply with them than with the connectors described above. Therefore, DC inputs are used mainly in high-capacity power banks, where charging through a "weaker" interface would take an unreasonably long time. However, such models can also be equipped with standard microUSB or USB type C connectors "just in case".

Nominal charge current supported by the power bank when charging its own battery via microUSB, USB type C, or Lightning (see "Battery charging inputs").

This is the maximum and, in fact, the recommended power bank charge current. If the amperes supplied by the power source exceed this value, the charge current will still be limited by the built-in controller to avoid overloading. And using a charger with a lower output current, in turn, will lead to an increase in charging time.

Data on the charge current via USB (Lightning) is especially important due to the fact that modern power banks are usually not equipped with their own chargers for these inputs, and energy sources must be separate. On the other hand, if a high charging speed is not critical for you, you can ignore this parameter: any USB connector is suitable as a power source for the corresponding power bank inputs.

The power in watts at which the power bank is charged under normal conditions.

The higher the charging power, the less time it takes to charge (given the same battery capacity). For example, fast charging of a power bank typically means a charging power of 30W or more. However, this parameter does not directly affect compatibility with charging devices: modern portable batteries can work with chargers of both higher and lower power. In the first case, the battery controller will automatically limit the charging current, while in the second case, charging will simply take more time.