USA
Catalog   /   Tools & Gardening   /   Construction Power Tools   /   Paint Sprayers

Comparison Phiolent KR2-650 vs Phiolent KR1-450

Add to comparison
Phiolent KR2-650
Phiolent KR1-450
Phiolent KR2-650Phiolent KR1-450
Outdated ProductOutdated Product
TOP sellers
Main
Includes interchangeable nozzles with a diameter of 1.8 and 2.6 mm
Includes interchangeable nozzles with a diameter of 1.8 and 2.6 mm
Devicepaint sprayerpaint sprayer
Typecordedcorded
Specs
Power consumption650 W400 W
Paint consumption0.8 L/min0.8 L/min
Maximum viscosity60 DIN80 DIN
Nozzle size1.8, 2.6 mm1.8, 2.6 mm
Sprayingpneumaticairless
Spray systemHVLP (High Volume Low Pressure)
Containerbottombottom
Container volume800 mL800 mL
Tank materialplasticplastic
General
Remote compressor
Weight2.2 kg1.3 kg
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2020february 2020

Power consumption

The power consumed by the operation of an electric tool (see "Type").

Most modern spray guns, even performant ones, have a rather low power: for example, models with more than 1 kW are extremely rare, and in most cases, power consumption does not exceed 500 W at all. So when connecting such equipment to sockets, there are usually no problems; only single units of high performance, requiring 3.5 kW or more, have to be connected according to special rules (directly to the shield). In other cases, data on power consumption is most often not needed for normal use and may be required only for specific tasks — for example, to calculate the load on an autonomous generator.

Maximum viscosity

The maximum viscosity of the paint or other working material at which the spray gun is able to work normally. Specified in DIN units; a certain DIN in this case is the number of seconds it takes for a standard volume of paint (usually 100 mL) to pour out of a funnel with a strictly defined pour hole diameter (usually about 4 mm). Such a funnel (viscometer) can be supplied with the spray gun, but if necessary, it can be purchased separately.

Thus, the larger the DIN, the more viscous the composition is. And the larger the number indicated in the characteristics of the spray gun, the wider its capabilities, the thicker liquids can be poured into it without fear of clogging and breakage. At the same time, it should be taken into account that in fact it is not so often necessary to work with thick liquids — on the contrary, excessive viscosity worsens the quality of the coating, leads to streaks and increases the drying time. For example, most enamels and oil paints are used at a viscosity of about 20 DIN, latex paints up to 45 DIN, etc. General recommendations on this matter can be found in special sources, and specific ones can be found on the packaging of a particular brand of paint or other composition.

Spraying

Spray method used by the spray gun.

— Pneumatic. Pneumatic (air) spray tools work on the principle of a spray gun: paint particles are captured by the air stream flowing from the nozzle and transferred to the surface to be painted. This method is standard for pneumatic tools, but it is also common in other types (see above). The advantages of pneumatics are the excellent uniformity of application and the aesthetic appearance of the resulting coating, as well as its versatility — it can be used both for small jobs and for large surfaces, for objects of any complexity and with almost any type of paint and varnish materials. And the equipment is relatively simple and inexpensive. The main disadvantages of this method are high fogging (which requires good ventilation and protective equipment, and also increases material consumption) and the need to dilute the material to a working consistency (which, in turn, affects the consumption of solvents).

Airless. Airless spraying is based on forcing the paint material with a special high pressure pump; roughly speaking, the spray gun "spits out" the paint through a nozzle, spraying it into a stream of the desired shape. The key advantages of this method over the pneumatic one are, firstly, high productivity (including due to higher efficiency and lower material losses), and secondly, the absolute minimum of fogging. It is also worth noting the low consumption of solvents and a clear...border of the edges of the treated area. At the same time, the uniformity and appearance of the coating during such work is much worse than with air spraying, the uniformity is lower, and the equipment turns out to be expensive and difficult both in itself and in maintenance. Therefore, airless spray is recommended for large areas where productivity is more important than high quality. In addition, this option is indicated for rollers (see "View"): in them the technology is somewhat different from that described, but it also does not imply a supply of compressed air.

Spray system

The type of spray system used in the device. Different spray systems differ in the format of work and, as a result, in individual practical nuances of use:

HP (High Pressure) / CONV (conventional). One of the most famous and popular spray systems. The air pressure at the inlet and outlet of such spray guns is approximately the same. The advantages of HP systems are the simplicity of design, large working width, high paint application speed and relatively low air consumption. At the same time, the percentage of paint transfer in such sprayers is very low — more than half of the applied material bounces off the surface due to high speed and settles on surrounding objects. Another disadvantage is that the flow from the HP atomizer picks up fine dust and other "flying debris" heavily; because of this, additional grinding and polishing of the painted surface is often required.

RP (Reduced Pressure). Modification of conventional (HP) atomizers, characterized by a slightly reduced outlet pressure. This allowed for some improvement in the transfer coefficient and reduced debris levels while maintaining the advantages of good performance, uniformity and low air consumption. Nevertheless, according to these indicators, such devices are still inferior to low-pressure models.

HVLP (High Volume Low Pressure). Spray system with reduced outlet pressure (a...pprox. 0.7 bar) and large air volumes. One of the key advantages of such devices is a high ink transfer coefficient of at least 65%. In addition, the low speed of the paint supply reduces the level of debris: there are relatively few turbulences that “pull” debris along with them. The main disadvantage of HVLP systems can be called high air consumption; not every compressor can handle such an atomizer. In addition, they require additional filters to protect against oil and moisture entering the air during high compressor loads; and you can work with such a device only at a short distance (usually up to 15 cm), and in order to avoid drips, a certain skill is required.

— HVLP-II (New High Volume Low Pressure). The second generation of HVLP (see the relevant paragraph), which has a number of improvements compared to the original, but is generally similar.

— LVLP (Low Volume Low Pressure) / Trans-Tech. Spray systems developed as an improvement to HVLP. With the same advantages (high transfer coefficient, minimum debris), they consume much less air and have softer requirements for compressors and hoses. In addition, LVLP systems are less sensitive to pressure drops, and the effective spraying range in them reaches 25 – 30 cm. Of the notable disadvantages of this option, one can only mention a rather high cost.

— HVMP (High Volume Middle Pressure). Spray systems with high air flow and medium outlet pressure. Compared to HVLP, due to the higher pressure, they give a slightly lower ink transfer efficiency, but greater uniformity and range.

— LVMP (Low Volume Middle Pressure). Spray systems with low air consumption and medium pressure; a kind of modification of LVLP, characterized by higher pressure. Due to this, the cost is somewhat reduced, productivity, uniformity of application and capture width are increased; however, paint consumption is higher and the finished surface is rougher than original LVLP.

— HTE (High Transfer Efficiency). This marking is used in spray systems for which a high transfer coefficient is claimed by the manufacturers. In terms of characteristics, they are most often similar to LVLPs (see the relevant paragraph) — in particular, they have a rather large effective range. However, specific features in each case should be clarified separately.

— EA (Excellent Atomization). The main feature of such systems, in accordance with the name, is a very high degree of atomization of the material. Other performance characteristics in such systems may be different, these points should be clarified separately.

— HEA (High Efficiency Airless). Proprietary airless spray technology (see "Spray") used in the Wagner brand technique. Reduces paint wastage by more than 50% compared to more traditional systems, as well as more even material distribution, according to the creators. Suitable for water and oil based coatings.

MP (Middle Pressure). Transitional option between the HP and RP described above: it provides a slightly lower working pressure compared to HP, but not as low as in RP. For a number of reasons, it did not receive distribution.

HD (Heavy Duty). A marketing designation used on individual sprayers, typically high-capacity, high-volume sprayers. The specific characteristics of such systems should be clarified separately.

Remote compressor

The presence of a remote compressor in the design of the spray gun.

This feature means that, firstly, the unit is equipped with its own compressor (that is, it is electrical, see "Type"), and secondly, this compressor (or pump for airless spraying) is made separately from the sprayer and is connected to it special hose. Thanks to this design, the atomizer itself is as light and compact as possible, which is especially important for large volumes of work or for delicate work that requires maximum precision and accuracy. In light of the latter, all electric airbrushes (see "View") are equipped with remote compressors, although this feature is also found in other types of spray guns — in particular, this design is mandatory for paint stations (see ibid.).
Phiolent KR2-650 often compared