USA
Catalog   /   Camping & Fishing   /   Camping   /   Thermoses

Comparison Thermos FBB-750B 0.75 L vs Thermos FBB-1000 1 L

Add to comparison
Thermos FBB-750B 0.75 L
Thermos FBB-1000 1 L
Thermos FBB-750B 0.75 LThermos FBB-1000 1 L
from $45.16 
Outdated Product
from $30.80 up to $35.52
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
Main
Long time to keep the temperature of the drink. Plug with valve mechanism. Convenient to use. Lightweight and narrow housing made of impact-resistant stainless steel.
Typethermosthermos
Specs
Capacity750 ml1000 ml
Opening/supplyvalvevalve
Flask materialstainless steelstainless steel
Materialstainless steelstainless steel
Color
Added to E-Catalogmay 2014september 2013

Capacity

The nominal volume of a thermos is the maximum amount of contents that it can be guaranteed to contain.

This parameter is directly related to the type (see above). So, a capacity of up to 500 mL is quite normal for a thermo mug, a flask or a baby thermos, but it is considered small for a classic thermos, and even more so a jug or a thermos for food. The "500 to 1000 mL" category includes most traditional and food models; for mugs, flasks and children's thermoses, this is actually the maximum volume. Among the jugs there are many more capacious options — from 1000 to 1500 mL. A volume of 1500 to 2000 mL is considered quite large, and the most solid models can hold more than 2 liters.

Anyway, a large volume allows you to hold more drink or food, but the downside of this is an increase in the size, weight and price of the thermos itself. Therefore, when choosing, you should not chase the maximum capacity, but proceed from real needs. For example, a model of 400 – 500 mL is quite enough for two cups of coffee, and for tea drinking at a halt for 3 – 4 people, it is advisable to have a model of at least 1000 mL. More detailed selection recommendations can be found in special sources; especially they will be useful to those who choose a thermos for long-distance hiking trips.
Thermos FBB-750B often compared
Thermos FBB-1000 often compared