USA
Catalog   /   Home & Renovation   /   Bathroom & Taps   /   Bathroom & Shower   /   Shower Systems

Comparison Grohe New Tempesta Cosmopolitan 160 27922000 vs Hansgrohe Croma 27135000

Add to comparison
Hansgrohe Croma 27135000
Grohe New Tempesta Cosmopolitan 160 27922000Hansgrohe Croma 27135000
from $263.44 up to $303.96
Outdated Product
from $225.80 up to $434.52
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
Typeshower Systemshower System
Top shower (tropical)
Size160 mm160 mm
Shaperoundround
Water flow17 L/min
Tilt angle30 °52 °
Hand shower (shower head)
Size100 mm100 mm
Jet settings24
Water consumption18 L/min
Hose length175 cm160 cm
Tap
Tap typethermostaticthermostatic
Color
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2017march 2014

Water flow

Water consumption during operation of the upper shower (cf. «Equipment»). Indicates the amount of water passing through the watering can with the tap fully open and the water pressure 3 bar (standard household water pressure).

The higher the bandwidth of the watering can be - the more powerful and intense the shower becomes. On the other hand, high water consumption is undesirable if you want to save water - for example, if you have meters installed or if water is supplied from a boiler with a small volume. In addition, it is worth remembering that the watering can have different settings and features of water supply. So, by selecting the lake with the right parameters, you can get a nice and effective top shower even when low water flow. Actually, a low value in this case is considered to be up to 10 l /min; the average is 10 - 20 l/min, and in the most productive watering can be up to 30 l/min and even more.

Tilt angle

The top shower angle is tilted in both directions. Not all models have adjustment, and even those in which it is constructively laid have different angles. By itself the ability to adjust the inclination angle of the upper shower allows you to adjust the flow of water to the desired side for the needs of a particular user.

Jet settings

The number of jet settings provided in the complete manual or hygienic watering can (see "Complete set"). However, hygienic leukemias are usually made single-mode - this is quite enough considering the application. But in conventional manual waterjets can be several, which allows you to change the characteristics of the jet at the request of the user - for example, instead of the usual thin jets, turn on a hard jet from a single large nozzle or a solid «soft» Flow from water filled with air bubbles. The specific set of settings can be different, it is worth to refine separately. However, in any case, the more options - the wider the choice of the user and the more complicated and more expensive the watering box itself.

Water consumption

The throughput capacity of a manual shower watering agent, in other words, the amount of water it gives out per minute when the faucets are fully open. Since the capacity is not only related to the design of the watering box, but also to the pressure in the water supply, it is customary to specify an average value - at a standard pressure of 3 bar.

The higher this parameter - the more intense the impact on the body can have a shower. At the same time, high water consumption can become a problem when there are water meters or when there are limited supplies - for example, if hot water is supplied by a boiler. Also note that , low throughput can be compensated by certain jet settings.

Hose length

The length of hose for the shower head be supplied with a shower system of one type or another (see above). In most modern models, this parameter is about 140 - 160 cm - it is enough that even a tall man could easily rinse completely, from the top. In addition, some hoses can stretch 20-30% of their original length. So in practice, it is worth paying attention to the length of the hose except in special cases - for example, if the system is bought for a very spacious bathroom and you need a shower with an increased «radius of action».
Grohe New Tempesta Cosmopolitan 160 27922000 often compared
Hansgrohe Croma 27135000 often compared