USA
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Components   /   Computer Cooling

Comparison Aardwolf Optima 10X vs Cooler Master Hyper T4

Add to comparison
Aardwolf Optima 10X
Cooler Master Hyper T4
Aardwolf Optima 10XCooler Master Hyper T4
Outdated ProductCompare prices 1
TOP sellers
Main specs
Featuresfor CPUfor CPU
Product typeair coolerair cooler
Fan
Number of fans11
Fan size120 mm120 mm
Bearinghydrodynamicrolling
Max. RPM1700 rpm1800 rpm
Speed controllerauto (PWM)
auto (PWM) /600-1800 rpm/
Max. air flow60 CFM70 CFM
MTBF40 K hours
Air flow directionsideways (dispersion)sideways (dispersion)
replaceable
Lighting
 /blue/
Noise level32 dB32 dB
Radiator
Heat pipes43
Heatpipe contactstraight
Heatsink materialaluminium/copperaluminium/copper
Plate materialaluminium
Socket
AMD AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2
AMD AM4
Intel 775
Intel 1150
Intel 1155/1156
Intel 1366
Intel 2011 / 2011 v3
Intel 2066
Intel 1151 / 1151 v2
Intel 1200
AMD AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2
AMD AM4
Intel 775
Intel 1150
Intel 1155/1156
Intel 1366
Intel 2011 / 2011 v3
 
Intel 1151 / 1151 v2
Intel 1200
General
Power source4-pin4-pin
Mount typebilateral (backplate)bilateral (backplate)
Dimensions130x95x154 mm131.6x72.5x152.3 mm
Height154 mm152 mm
Weight760 g548 g
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2018february 2013

Bearing

The type of bearing used in the cooling fan(s).

The bearing is the piece between the rotating axle of the fan and the fixed base that supports the axle and reduces friction. The following types of bearings are found in modern fans:

Sliding. The action of these bearings is based on direct contact between two solid surfaces, carefully polished to reduce friction. Such devices are simple, reliable and durable, but their efficiency is rather low — rolling, and even more so the hydrodynamic and magnetic principle of operation (see below), provide much less friction.

Rolling. They are also called "ball bearings", since the "intermediaries" between the axis of rotation and the fixed base are balls (less often — cylindrical rollers) fixed in a special ring. When the axis rotates, such balls roll between it and the base, due to which the friction force is very low — noticeably lower than in plain bearings. On the other hand, the design turns out to be more expensive and complex, and in terms of reliability it is somewhat inferior to both the same plain bearings and more advanced hydrodynamic devices (see below). Therefore, although rolling bearings are quite widespread nowadays, however, in general, they are much less common than the mentioned varieties.

Hydrodynamic. Bearings of this type are filled with a special liquid; when rotate...d, it creates a layer on which the moving part of the bearing slides. In this way, direct contact between hard surfaces is avoided and friction is significantly reduced compared to previous types. Also, these bearings are quiet and very reliable. Of their shortcomings, a relatively high cost can be noted, but in fact this moment often turns out to be invisible against the background of the price of the entire system. Therefore, this option is extremely popular nowadays, it can be found in cooling systems of all levels — from low-cost to advanced.

Magnetic centering. Bearings based on the principle of magnetic levitation: the rotating axis is "suspended" in a magnetic field. Thus, it is possible (as in hydrodynamic ones) to avoid contact between solid surfaces and further reduce friction. Considered the most advanced type of bearings, they are reliable and quiet, but expensive.

Max. RPM

The highest speed at which the cooling system fan is capable of operating; for models without a speed controller (see below), this item indicates the nominal rotation speed. In the "slowest" modern fans, the maximum speed does not exceed 1000 rpm, in the "fastest" it can be up to 2500 rpm and even more.

Note that this parameter is closely related to the fan diameter (see above): the smaller the diameter, the higher the speed must be to achieve the desired airflow values. In this case, the rotation speed directly affects the level of noise and vibration. Therefore, it is believed that the required volume of air is best provided by large and relatively "slow" fans; and it makes sense to use "fast" small models where compactness is crucial. If we compare the speed of models of the same size, then higher speeds have a positive effect on performance, but increase not only the noise level, but also the price and power consumption.

Max. air flow

The maximum airflow that a cooling fan can create; measured in CFM — cubic feet per minute.

The higher the CFM number, the more efficient the fan. On the other hand, high performance requires either a large diameter (which affects the size and cost) or high speed (which increases the noise and vibration levels). Therefore, when choosing, it makes sense not to chase the maximum air flow, but to use special formulas that allow you to calculate the required number of CFM depending on the type and power of the cooled component and other parameters. Such formulas can be found in special sources. As for specific numbers, in the most modest systems, the performance does not exceed 30 CFM, and in the most powerful systems it can be up to 80 CFM and even more.

It is also worth considering that the actual value of the air flow at the highest speed is usually lower than the claimed maximum; see Static Pressure for details.

MTBF

The total time that a cooling fan is guaranteed to run before it fails. Note that when this time is exhausted, the device will not necessarily break — many modern fans have a significant margin of safety and are able to work for some more period. At the same time, it is worth evaluating the overall durability of the cooling system according to this parameter.

Lighting

The presence of its own illumination in the design of the cooling system.

The backlight serves a purely aesthetic function — it gives the device a stylish appearance that blends well with other components in the original design. Thanks to this, such cooling systems are especially appreciated by gamers and fans of external PC modding — especially since the lighting can be different, and the most advanced models even provide backlight synchronization with other components (see below). On the other hand, this function does not affect the efficiency and performance, and the overall cost is inevitably affected, sometimes quite noticeably. Therefore, if the appearance does not play a fundamental role for you, the best choice, most likely, will be a cooling system without backlight.

Heat pipes

Number of heat pipes in the cooling system

The heat pipe is a hermetically sealed structure containing a low-boiling liquid. When one end of the tube is heated, this liquid evaporates and condenses at the other end, thus removing heat from the heating source and transferring it to the cooler. Nowadays, such devices are widely used mainly in processor cooling systems (see "Intended use") — they connect the substrate that is in direct contact with the CPU and the heatsink of the active cooler. Manufacturers select the number of tubes based on the overall performance of the cooler (see "Maximum TDP"); however, models with similar TDPs can still differ markedly in this parameter. In such cases, it is worth considering the following: increasing the number of heat pipes increases the efficiency of heat transfer, but also increases the dimensions, weight and cost of the entire structure.

As for the number, the simplest models provide 1 – 2 heat pipes, and in the most advanced and powerful processor systems, this number can be 7 or more.

Heatpipe contact

The type of contact between the heat pipes provided in the heatsink of the cooling system and the cooled components (usually the CPU). For more information about heat pipes, see above, and the types of contact can be as follows:

Indirect. The classic version of the design: heat pipes pass through a metal (usually aluminium) base, which is directly adjacent to the surface of the chip. The advantage of such contact is the most even distribution of heat between the tubes, regardless of the physical size of the chip itself (the main thing is that it should not be larger than the sole). At the same time, the extra piece between the processor and the tubes inevitably increases thermal resistance and slightly reduces the overall cooling efficiency. In many systems, especially high-end ones, this drawback is compensated by various design solutions (primarily by the tightest connection of the tubes with the sole), but this, in turn, affects the cost.

Direct. With direct contact, the heat pipes fit directly on the cooled chip, without an additional sole; for this, the surface of the tubes on the desired side is ground down to a plane. Due to the absence of intermediate parts, the thermal resistance at the places where the tubes fit is minimal, and at the same time, the radiator design itself is simpler and cheaper than with indirect contact. On the other hand, there are gaps between the heat...pipes, sometimes very large — as a result, the surface of the serviced chip is cooled unevenly. This is partly offset by the presence of a substrate (in this case, it fills these gaps) and the use of thermal paste, however, in terms of uniformity of heat removal, direct contact is still inevitably inferior to indirect contact. Therefore, this option is found mainly in inexpensive coolers, although it can also be used in fairly performant solutions.

Plate material

The material from which the substrate of the cooling system is made is the surface that is in direct contact with the cooled component (most often the processor). This parameter is especially important for models with heat pipes (see above), although it can be specified for coolers without this function. Options can be as follows: aluminium, nickel-plated aluminium, copper, nickel-plated stranded. More about them.

— Aluminium. The traditional, most common backing material. At a relatively low cost, aluminium has good thermal conductivity characteristics, is easy to grind (required for a snug fit), and well resists scratches and other irregularities, as well as corrosion. However in terms of heat removal efficiency, this material is still inferior to copper — however, this becomes noticeable mainly in advanced systems that require the highest possible thermal conductivity.

— Copper. Copper is noticeably more expensive than aluminium, but this is offset by higher thermal conductivity and, accordingly, cooling efficiency. The noticeable disadvantages of this metal include some tendency to corrosion when exposed to moisture and certain substances. Therefore, pure copper is used relatively rarely — nickel-plated substrates are more common (see below).

— Nickel-plated copper. Copper substrate with an additional n...ickel coating. Such a coating increases resistance to corrosion and scratches, while it practically does not affect the thermal conductivity of the substrate and work efficiency. However this feature somewhat increases the price of the radiator, but it is found mainly in high-end cooling systems, where this moment is almost invisible against the background of the overall cost of the device.

— Nickel-plated aluminium. Aluminium substrate with an additional nickel coating. For aluminium in general, see above, and the coating makes the heatsink more resistant to corrosion, scratches, and burrs. On the other hand, it affects the cost, despite the fact that in fact, pure aluminium is often quite sufficient for efficient operation (especially since this metal itself is very resistant to corrosion). Therefore, this variant was not distributed.

Socket

Socket type - socket for CPU - with which the corresponding cooling system is compatible.

Different sockets differ not only in compatibility with a particular CPU, but also in the configuration of the seat for the cooling system. So, when purchasing a processor cooling system separately, you should make sure that it is compatible with the socket. Nowadays, solutions are produced mainly for the following types of sockets: AMD AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2, AMD AM4, AMD AM5, AMD TR4/TRX4, Intel 775, Intel 1150, Intel 1155/1156, Intel 1366, Intel 2011/2011 v3, Intel 2066, Intel 1151/1151 v2, Intel 1200, Intel 1700.
Aardwolf Optima 10X often compared