Comparison Hator Icefall Pro Wireless vs Hator Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless
Add to comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hator Icefall Pro Wireless | Hator Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless | |
| Outdated Product | Outdated Product | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
| Connection | Bluetooth / radio / wired | Bluetooth / radio / wired |
| Bluetooth version | v5.3 | v5.3 |
| Multi-Device | ||
| Cable length | 1.8 m | |
| Type | for game | for game |
| Form factor | 75% (compact TKL, without Num-block) | 80% (TKL, without Numpad) |
| Layout | ANSI | ANSI |
Keyboard | ||
| Key profile | high | high |
| Key type | classic type | classic type |
| Switch technology | mechanical | mechanical |
| Switches | Hator Aurum Orange rev.2.0 (Linear) | Hator Aurum Orange (Linear) |
| Switch resource | 70 million clicks | 70 million clicks |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz (1 ms) | 1000 Hz (1 ms) |
| PBT keycaps | ||
| Hot Swap | ||
| Anti-Ghosting | ||
| #KRO | N-KRO | N-KRO |
| Fn key | ||
| CMD / OPT keys | ||
Features | ||
| Cyrillic colour | transparent | transparent |
| Application of symbols (Latin) | double-shot | |
| Application of symbols (Cyrillic) | double-shot | |
| Volume control | wheel | fn |
| Built-in memory | ||
| Game mode | ||
| Lighting | RGB | RGB |
| Lighting effects | + | + |
Connection and power supply | ||
| Cable | USB-A removable | USB-A removable braided |
| Power source | battery | battery |
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Battery life | 60 h | 160 h |
| Port on the device | USB C | USB C |
| Receiver (dongle) | USB A | USB A |
General | ||
| LCD screen | ||
| Inner metal plate | ||
| Gasket Mount | ||
| Size | 328x137x40 mm | 364x144x44 mm |
| Weight | 750 g | 943 g |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | march 2025 | january 2025 |
Compare Hator Icefall Pro Wireless and Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless
Keyboards Hator Icefall Pro Wireless and Hator Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless offer similar features but have their unique characteristics. The Icefall Pro Wireless stands out with its compact 75% form factor, support for three connection modes (Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired), as well as a color TFT screen and aluminum volume dial. Meanwhile, the Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless offers a gasket mount design, which provides softer keystrokes and improves acoustic properties, as well as support for QMK/VIA for extensive customization. In terms of battery life, the Rockfall 3 surpasses the Icefall, providing up to 160 hours of operation without backlighting. Both devices feature Hator Aurum Orange mechanical switches with a lifespan of 70 million keystrokes and Hot Swap support, although the Icefall Pro has more vibrant RGB backlighting and additional features like volume adjustment through a wheel. Ultimately, the choice between them depends on the user's preferences: Icefall Pro for those who value style and functionality, and Rockfall 3 for those seeking comfort and customization.
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Hator Icefall Pro Wireless often compared
Hator Rockfall 3 TKL Wireless often compared
Glossary
Cable length
The length of the cable that the keyboard is equipped with for wired connection (see "Connection type").
When choosing this parameter, you should first of all take into account the distance from the device to the connection port: a cable that is too short may simply not reach the connector, and a cable that is too long may get confused at hand and create inconvenience. As for specific values, the reference length is 1.8 m. However, there are cables both shorter and longer.
When choosing this parameter, you should first of all take into account the distance from the device to the connection port: a cable that is too short may simply not reach the connector, and a cable that is too long may get confused at hand and create inconvenience. As for specific values, the reference length is 1.8 m. However, there are cables both shorter and longer.
Form factor
— 100% (full-sized). Classic layout with 104/105 keys featuring a full NumPad, dedicated F1–F12 row, and navigation cluster including Insert/Delete, Home/End, PgUp/PgDn; this version is valued for its familiar geometry, typing speed, and ease of frequent number entry, making it optimal for work in Excel, accounting, IDEs, and editing programs, while in games, the NumPad is often used for binds and macros; compared to TKL/80% without a numeric block, as well as 96% and 1800-compact, the 100% format offers maximum comfort and requires less retraining, but takes up more desk space and pushes the mouse further away, so for compact workplaces, it might be wiser to consider smaller formats.
— 1800 (compact full-sized). A full-featured layout with a numeric block but in a narrower body: the NumPad is shifted closer to the main field, and navigation is often placed above it or compacted next to the arrow keys. It feels like "100%", but is shorter by a few centimeters, so the mouse is closer to the center, offering more comfort for wrists. Compared to TKL, you retain fast number entry, and against 96%, you gain a slightly more "airy" geometry with clear orientation. Note the non-standard sizes of some keys and the right block, which sometimes require special keycap sets. This format is convenient for Excel, accounting, IDEs, and editing, while offering gamers the NumPad for macros while saving desk space.
...r> — 96% (compact full-sized). Keyboards that preserve all key zones of 100% (F1–F12 row, arrow keys, navigation, and NumPad) but place them in a tight "grid" layout, almost like TKL in width. The numeric block is shifted closer to the main area, while Insert/Home/End and PgUp/PgDn are often reduced to 1u and grouped above the arrows or next to the NumPad. Compared to the 1800 format, 96% is even more compact and visually "smoother," and against TKL, you do not lose the speed of number entry. Note the possible non-standard sizes of the right shift, zeros, and plus on the NumPad, requiring a more selective keycap choice. This format is chosen for Excel and accounting, editing and coding, while gamers use the NumPad for macros, gaining maximum functions with minimal table width.
— 80% (TKL, without Num-block). A full-featured keyboard without a numeric block: retains the F1–F12 row, arrow keys, and navigation Insert/Delete, Home/End, PgUp/PgDn, but is considerably narrower, bringing the mouse closer to the center, which is easier on the shoulders and wrists. Gamers and developers favor this format: there’s more desk space, while familiar keys and hotkeys remain in place. Compared to 100%, you only lose quick number entry, which can be supplemented with a separate wireless NumPad. In comparison to 75%, TKL is more readable and "airy" thanks to its separate navigation block; unlike 96%, it is more compact for mouse grip, though lacking a NumPad. The 80% (TKL) format is optimal for FPS, work in IDEs, editing, and everyday office tasks where numbers aren’t entered continuously.
— 75% (compact TKL, without Num-block). "Almost TKL," where all main keys are within reach, but the body is shorter by several centimeters due to a tight "staircase" arrangement of arrows and navigation. Compared to 80%, it decreases the distance between hands and mouse, enhancing ergonomics for prolonged use, and relative to 100% and 96%, you lose only the numeric block, gaining space for the mouse and a more neutral shoulder posture. This format is chosen for IDEs and design packages, FPS and MOBA, mobile setups with narrow desks, when numbers are entered infrequently or supplemented with an external NumPad. Note: 75% may have non-standard sizes in the right block and individual keys, which is important when selecting keycaps and stabilizers.
— 65% (ultra-compact, without F-row). "Condensed TKL": the alphanumeric block, arrow keys, and a pair of navigation keys remain in place, while the NumPad and the top F1–F12 row are accessed via Fn. This layout is significantly narrower in width, moving the mouse closer to the center, which reduces the spread of arms — ideal for narrow desks, when working on a laptop, and for travel. Compared to 60%, the 65% format is more practical thanks to dedicated arrows and Delete; against 75% and 80%, it is more compact but often requires getting accustomed to layers. Possible non-standard sizes of the right shift and navigation keys are important when choosing keycaps. In real-world scenarios, the 65% format is excellent for IDEs, streaming, and FPS/MOBA games, while regular number entry is complemented by an external wireless NumPad.
— 60% (mini). Classic "trimmed" layout with ~61/62 keys without NumPad, no F1–F12 top row, and no separate navigation cluster: all accessed through the Fn layer, with arrows usually assigned to combinations. Compared to 65%, this format is even more compact but often requires acclimatization to layers; against 75%/80%, you save desk width and achieve a more neutral shoulder posture, at the cost of losing "quick" F-keys. The strong points of 60% are portability, free space for the mouse and mat, and reduced arm movement between keyboard and mouse, making it popular with FPS gamers, streamers, and those working on laptops at narrow desks or traveling. If active number entry or "hot" F-keys are needed, an external wireless NumPad and well-thought-out layer layout help.
— 40% (ultra-mini). Radically compact layout with about 40–50 keys, lacking a number row, arrows, and F-keys: all are accessed via Fn layers, combined presses, and macros, often with an ortholinear matrix. Due to the minimal width, the mouse is closer to the center, reducing hand spread and freeing up desk space, appreciated by mobile users and minimalists. Compared to 60% and 65%, the 40% format requires more serious adaptation and thoughtful firmware (QMK/VIA, home-row mods, tap-dance), and keycap selection is more challenging due to non-standard sizes. The strong point is portability and speed after getting used to it; weakness — reliance on layers and inconvenience of frequent number entry and arrow navigation. The 40% format is practical for travel, work on laptops with docking stations, text editing with hotkeys, and streaming, while numbers are usually supplemented with an external NumPad.
— 1800 (compact full-sized). A full-featured layout with a numeric block but in a narrower body: the NumPad is shifted closer to the main field, and navigation is often placed above it or compacted next to the arrow keys. It feels like "100%", but is shorter by a few centimeters, so the mouse is closer to the center, offering more comfort for wrists. Compared to TKL, you retain fast number entry, and against 96%, you gain a slightly more "airy" geometry with clear orientation. Note the non-standard sizes of some keys and the right block, which sometimes require special keycap sets. This format is convenient for Excel, accounting, IDEs, and editing, while offering gamers the NumPad for macros while saving desk space.
...r> — 96% (compact full-sized). Keyboards that preserve all key zones of 100% (F1–F12 row, arrow keys, navigation, and NumPad) but place them in a tight "grid" layout, almost like TKL in width. The numeric block is shifted closer to the main area, while Insert/Home/End and PgUp/PgDn are often reduced to 1u and grouped above the arrows or next to the NumPad. Compared to the 1800 format, 96% is even more compact and visually "smoother," and against TKL, you do not lose the speed of number entry. Note the possible non-standard sizes of the right shift, zeros, and plus on the NumPad, requiring a more selective keycap choice. This format is chosen for Excel and accounting, editing and coding, while gamers use the NumPad for macros, gaining maximum functions with minimal table width.
— 80% (TKL, without Num-block). A full-featured keyboard without a numeric block: retains the F1–F12 row, arrow keys, and navigation Insert/Delete, Home/End, PgUp/PgDn, but is considerably narrower, bringing the mouse closer to the center, which is easier on the shoulders and wrists. Gamers and developers favor this format: there’s more desk space, while familiar keys and hotkeys remain in place. Compared to 100%, you only lose quick number entry, which can be supplemented with a separate wireless NumPad. In comparison to 75%, TKL is more readable and "airy" thanks to its separate navigation block; unlike 96%, it is more compact for mouse grip, though lacking a NumPad. The 80% (TKL) format is optimal for FPS, work in IDEs, editing, and everyday office tasks where numbers aren’t entered continuously.
— 75% (compact TKL, without Num-block). "Almost TKL," where all main keys are within reach, but the body is shorter by several centimeters due to a tight "staircase" arrangement of arrows and navigation. Compared to 80%, it decreases the distance between hands and mouse, enhancing ergonomics for prolonged use, and relative to 100% and 96%, you lose only the numeric block, gaining space for the mouse and a more neutral shoulder posture. This format is chosen for IDEs and design packages, FPS and MOBA, mobile setups with narrow desks, when numbers are entered infrequently or supplemented with an external NumPad. Note: 75% may have non-standard sizes in the right block and individual keys, which is important when selecting keycaps and stabilizers.
— 65% (ultra-compact, without F-row). "Condensed TKL": the alphanumeric block, arrow keys, and a pair of navigation keys remain in place, while the NumPad and the top F1–F12 row are accessed via Fn. This layout is significantly narrower in width, moving the mouse closer to the center, which reduces the spread of arms — ideal for narrow desks, when working on a laptop, and for travel. Compared to 60%, the 65% format is more practical thanks to dedicated arrows and Delete; against 75% and 80%, it is more compact but often requires getting accustomed to layers. Possible non-standard sizes of the right shift and navigation keys are important when choosing keycaps. In real-world scenarios, the 65% format is excellent for IDEs, streaming, and FPS/MOBA games, while regular number entry is complemented by an external wireless NumPad.
— 60% (mini). Classic "trimmed" layout with ~61/62 keys without NumPad, no F1–F12 top row, and no separate navigation cluster: all accessed through the Fn layer, with arrows usually assigned to combinations. Compared to 65%, this format is even more compact but often requires acclimatization to layers; against 75%/80%, you save desk width and achieve a more neutral shoulder posture, at the cost of losing "quick" F-keys. The strong points of 60% are portability, free space for the mouse and mat, and reduced arm movement between keyboard and mouse, making it popular with FPS gamers, streamers, and those working on laptops at narrow desks or traveling. If active number entry or "hot" F-keys are needed, an external wireless NumPad and well-thought-out layer layout help.
— 40% (ultra-mini). Radically compact layout with about 40–50 keys, lacking a number row, arrows, and F-keys: all are accessed via Fn layers, combined presses, and macros, often with an ortholinear matrix. Due to the minimal width, the mouse is closer to the center, reducing hand spread and freeing up desk space, appreciated by mobile users and minimalists. Compared to 60% and 65%, the 40% format requires more serious adaptation and thoughtful firmware (QMK/VIA, home-row mods, tap-dance), and keycap selection is more challenging due to non-standard sizes. The strong point is portability and speed after getting used to it; weakness — reliance on layers and inconvenience of frequent number entry and arrow navigation. The 40% format is practical for travel, work on laptops with docking stations, text editing with hotkeys, and streaming, while numbers are usually supplemented with an external NumPad.
Switches
The model of switches (switches) used in the keyboard - switching mechanisms installed under each individual key. These details are given if the design uses advanced mechanics, positioned as a better option than traditional switches. Mostly gaming keyboards are equipped with such mechanics.
The most popular switch brands in our time are Cherry MX, considered the "classic of the genre" for high-quality mechanics; Gateron, practically not inferior to him; not so advanced, but also cheaper Kailh and Keychron, as well as ultra-budget Outemu. For all these brands, different types of switches have a different stem color, which can be used to determine the features of the keyboard. It is also worth saying that modern mechanical switches are divided into three main varieties: linear, tactile and clicky.
- Linear. Such solutions are closest to conventional membrane keyboards: the key travel is uniform along the entire length, with minimal resistance and the absence of a clear actuation point. There is an opinion that the linear "mechanics" is best suited for games where you have to deal with fast and frequent clicks; however, in practice, this moment largely depends on the personal tastes of th...e user, nothing prevents the use of such keyboards for working with texts.
- Tactile. Switches with a clearly defined actuation point - a kind of barrier to the path of the key. Such a "barrier" allows you to clearly determine by touch whether the key has worked or not. Tactile keyboards are valued primarily by tech who have to type large volumes of texts.
- Tactile-auditory (Clicky). In such switches, the actuation point is felt not only by touch, but also by ear: the actuation of the key is accompanied by a clearly audible click, which is often compared to the sound of the keys of a typewriter. Due to this, this option is also very popular among users dealing with texts. Some people consider switches of this type not very suitable for games, since they are supposedly not very convenient for frequent, fast pressing; however, a quality Clicky switch is as good as a linear switch in this regard, and the choice depends solely on personal preference. But the unequivocal disadvantages of such keyboards include a rather loud click sound, which in some situations may be superfluous.
As for specific colors, here are their features:
- Red (red). Linear type switches with minimum resistance. They are popular, in particular, among professional gamers who deal with dynamic games and try by all means to speed up their reaction to gaming events. On the other hand, a low force increases the likelihood of accidentally pressing an unnecessary button.
— Black. Another type of linear switches. They have a tighter move compared to Red, which, on the one hand, requires a little more effort, on the other hand, minimizes the chance of accidentally pressing the wrong key.
Blue. Switches in clicky format, with tactile feedback and a click.
— Brown. Switches with tactile feedback, but no "click". The Brown action is great for when you want a keyboard with tactile feedback and at the same time you want to avoid unnecessary noise (although the sound is still louder than on a membrane keyboard). In addition, it is considered a good option for tech who are just starting to get acquainted with mechanical keyboards.
— Silver. Linear switches designed for maximum operating speed. They have a very low stroke - about 1 - 1.2 mm - as well as a very small pressing force, which contributes to high speed. At the same time, the use of such a keyboard requires a certain skill, since even a small effort from an accidental touch usually leads to the operation of a key.
The most popular switch brands in our time are Cherry MX, considered the "classic of the genre" for high-quality mechanics; Gateron, practically not inferior to him; not so advanced, but also cheaper Kailh and Keychron, as well as ultra-budget Outemu. For all these brands, different types of switches have a different stem color, which can be used to determine the features of the keyboard. It is also worth saying that modern mechanical switches are divided into three main varieties: linear, tactile and clicky.
- Linear. Such solutions are closest to conventional membrane keyboards: the key travel is uniform along the entire length, with minimal resistance and the absence of a clear actuation point. There is an opinion that the linear "mechanics" is best suited for games where you have to deal with fast and frequent clicks; however, in practice, this moment largely depends on the personal tastes of th...e user, nothing prevents the use of such keyboards for working with texts.
- Tactile. Switches with a clearly defined actuation point - a kind of barrier to the path of the key. Such a "barrier" allows you to clearly determine by touch whether the key has worked or not. Tactile keyboards are valued primarily by tech who have to type large volumes of texts.
- Tactile-auditory (Clicky). In such switches, the actuation point is felt not only by touch, but also by ear: the actuation of the key is accompanied by a clearly audible click, which is often compared to the sound of the keys of a typewriter. Due to this, this option is also very popular among users dealing with texts. Some people consider switches of this type not very suitable for games, since they are supposedly not very convenient for frequent, fast pressing; however, a quality Clicky switch is as good as a linear switch in this regard, and the choice depends solely on personal preference. But the unequivocal disadvantages of such keyboards include a rather loud click sound, which in some situations may be superfluous.
As for specific colors, here are their features:
- Red (red). Linear type switches with minimum resistance. They are popular, in particular, among professional gamers who deal with dynamic games and try by all means to speed up their reaction to gaming events. On the other hand, a low force increases the likelihood of accidentally pressing an unnecessary button.
— Black. Another type of linear switches. They have a tighter move compared to Red, which, on the one hand, requires a little more effort, on the other hand, minimizes the chance of accidentally pressing the wrong key.
Blue. Switches in clicky format, with tactile feedback and a click.
— Brown. Switches with tactile feedback, but no "click". The Brown action is great for when you want a keyboard with tactile feedback and at the same time you want to avoid unnecessary noise (although the sound is still louder than on a membrane keyboard). In addition, it is considered a good option for tech who are just starting to get acquainted with mechanical keyboards.
— Silver. Linear switches designed for maximum operating speed. They have a very low stroke - about 1 - 1.2 mm - as well as a very small pressing force, which contributes to high speed. At the same time, the use of such a keyboard requires a certain skill, since even a small effort from an accidental touch usually leads to the operation of a key.
PBT keycaps
Keycaps made from polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), one of the toughest and most durable plastics for keyboards. Unlike ABS keycaps, they are more wear-resistant, do not become glossy over time, and are resistant to mechanical abrasion. This durability is also aided by high-quality symbol application methods, such as double-shot molding or laser engraving. PBT keycaps have a textured surface that feels pleasant to touch and provide a clearer and more tactile feedback when typing.
CMD / OPT keys
The CMD (command) key is an integral attribute of keyboards that are primarily designed to work with Mac OS computer systems. Plays an important role in the quick access service. So, in combination with other buttons, it allows you to open the command line and perform many other actions that are important for a computer system administrator. If we compare keyboards for Mac OS and Windows, then the “CMD” key is an analogue of the system “WIN” button (with the Windows logo), which opens the Start menu.
Similar tasks are assigned to the OPT (option) key. It is intended to be used in conjunction with other buttons to create keyboard shortcuts that enable a variety of additional functions in Mac OS operating systems. Drawing parallels with Windows keyboards, the OPT key is analogous to the Alt button. Typically, this key has the additional designation “⌥”.
Similar tasks are assigned to the OPT (option) key. It is intended to be used in conjunction with other buttons to create keyboard shortcuts that enable a variety of additional functions in Mac OS operating systems. Drawing parallels with Windows keyboards, the OPT key is analogous to the Alt button. Typically, this key has the additional designation “⌥”.
Application of symbols (Latin)
Legend application indicates how the Latin characters on the keys are made and how well they will survive years of heavy typing.
— Double-shot. The keycap is molded from two different plastics: the main “body” and a separate legend insert are formed together in a single mold, so the letters don’t wear off or fade at all. This method is ideal for RGB backlighting: if the legend layer is semi-transparent, light passes through the symbols without halos. ABS double-shot is more common (bright glow, pleasantly smooth feel), while the pricier PBT double-shot is rarer and offers higher surface wear resistance. Compared to laser engraving, the lifespan is an order of magnitude higher, and it beats the dye-sub method for backlighting (dye-sub doesn’t shine through). Downsides include cost and sometimes visible seams/thick walls that can affect the click’s sound profile. In practice, these keycaps are in demand for mechanical gaming keyboards, esports arenas, developers, and frequent hotkey typing—where double-shot keeps legends readable for years.
— Sublimation. A method of applying Latin symbols to keycaps where, under heat and pressure, the dye penetrates the top layer of plastic, creating a durable, “absorbed” legend. The print won’t rub off from fingers, resists household cleaners and UV light, preserves a matte texture, and maintains high contrast on light backgrounds, but it doesn’t let RGB shine through the symbols and is limited in palette. Compared to laser...engraving, it offers higher lifespan and readability, and versus double-shot it only loses in shine-through effects. Typical use cases include mechanical keyboards for typing, developers, and office work, where durability, the tactile matte PBT feel, and stable readability over years matter.
— Laser engraving. Burning/removing the top coating layer with a beam to form highly precise symbols. Legends last for years, but over time the fill paint can wear and contrast can drop in high-contact areas. Advantages include thin typefaces, clean contours, RGB compatibility, and low cost. Compared to double-shot, engraving is cheaper and more flexible in design, but not “forever”; versus dye-sub it wins on backlighting, but loses in tactile uniformity and longevity. Typical applications are mass-market office and gaming models with backlighting.
— Double-shot. The keycap is molded from two different plastics: the main “body” and a separate legend insert are formed together in a single mold, so the letters don’t wear off or fade at all. This method is ideal for RGB backlighting: if the legend layer is semi-transparent, light passes through the symbols without halos. ABS double-shot is more common (bright glow, pleasantly smooth feel), while the pricier PBT double-shot is rarer and offers higher surface wear resistance. Compared to laser engraving, the lifespan is an order of magnitude higher, and it beats the dye-sub method for backlighting (dye-sub doesn’t shine through). Downsides include cost and sometimes visible seams/thick walls that can affect the click’s sound profile. In practice, these keycaps are in demand for mechanical gaming keyboards, esports arenas, developers, and frequent hotkey typing—where double-shot keeps legends readable for years.
— Sublimation. A method of applying Latin symbols to keycaps where, under heat and pressure, the dye penetrates the top layer of plastic, creating a durable, “absorbed” legend. The print won’t rub off from fingers, resists household cleaners and UV light, preserves a matte texture, and maintains high contrast on light backgrounds, but it doesn’t let RGB shine through the symbols and is limited in palette. Compared to laser...engraving, it offers higher lifespan and readability, and versus double-shot it only loses in shine-through effects. Typical use cases include mechanical keyboards for typing, developers, and office work, where durability, the tactile matte PBT feel, and stable readability over years matter.
— Laser engraving. Burning/removing the top coating layer with a beam to form highly precise symbols. Legends last for years, but over time the fill paint can wear and contrast can drop in high-contact areas. Advantages include thin typefaces, clean contours, RGB compatibility, and low cost. Compared to double-shot, engraving is cheaper and more flexible in design, but not “forever”; versus dye-sub it wins on backlighting, but loses in tactile uniformity and longevity. Typical applications are mass-market office and gaming models with backlighting.
Application of symbols (Cyrillic)
Legend application indicates how the Latin letters are made on the keys and how well they will survive years of heavy typing.
— Double-shot. The keycap is molded from two different plastics: the main “body” and a separate insert with the legend are formed in the mold as a single piece, so the letters don’t wear off or fade at all. This method is ideal for RGB backlighting: if the legend layer is semi‑transparent, light passes through the symbols without halos. ABS double-shot is more common (bright glow, pleasantly smooth feel), while the more expensive PBT double-shot is rarer and offers higher surface durability. Compared to laser engraving, the lifespan is an order of magnitude higher, and it beats the sublimation method in backlighting (dye-sub doesn’t shine through). Downsides include the price and sometimes visible seams/thick walls that can affect key sound. In practice, these keycaps are in demand for mechanical gaming keyboards, esports arenas, developers, and frequent hotkey typing—situations where double-shot preserves legibility for years.
— Dye-sublimation. A method of applying Latin symbols to keycaps where dye penetrates the top layer of plastic under heat and pressure, creating a durable “soaked-in” legend. The print doesn’t rub off from fingers, isn’t afraid of household chemicals or UV light, keeps a matte texture, and offers high contrast on light backgrounds, but it doesn’t let RGB backlighting shine through the symbols and has palette li...mitations. Compared to laser engraving, durability and legibility are higher, and versus double-shot it only loses in shine-through effects. Typical use cases include mechanical keyboards for typing, developers, and office work, where long life, tactile matte PBT, and stable legibility over years are important.
— Laser engraving. Burning/removing the top coating layer with a beam to form a highly precise symbol. The symbols last for years, but over time the paint fill can wear off and contrast can drop in high-contact areas. Advantages include thin fonts, clean contours, RGB compatibility, and affordable cost. Compared to double-shot, engraving is cheaper and more flexible in design, but not “forever”; against dye-sub it wins with backlighting, but loses in tactile uniformity and longevity. Typical applications include mass-market office and gaming models with backlighting, as well as bilingual layouts where the Latin legends are made with a more durable technology and Cyrillic is added by laser.
— Double-shot. The keycap is molded from two different plastics: the main “body” and a separate insert with the legend are formed in the mold as a single piece, so the letters don’t wear off or fade at all. This method is ideal for RGB backlighting: if the legend layer is semi‑transparent, light passes through the symbols without halos. ABS double-shot is more common (bright glow, pleasantly smooth feel), while the more expensive PBT double-shot is rarer and offers higher surface durability. Compared to laser engraving, the lifespan is an order of magnitude higher, and it beats the sublimation method in backlighting (dye-sub doesn’t shine through). Downsides include the price and sometimes visible seams/thick walls that can affect key sound. In practice, these keycaps are in demand for mechanical gaming keyboards, esports arenas, developers, and frequent hotkey typing—situations where double-shot preserves legibility for years.
— Dye-sublimation. A method of applying Latin symbols to keycaps where dye penetrates the top layer of plastic under heat and pressure, creating a durable “soaked-in” legend. The print doesn’t rub off from fingers, isn’t afraid of household chemicals or UV light, keeps a matte texture, and offers high contrast on light backgrounds, but it doesn’t let RGB backlighting shine through the symbols and has palette li...mitations. Compared to laser engraving, durability and legibility are higher, and versus double-shot it only loses in shine-through effects. Typical use cases include mechanical keyboards for typing, developers, and office work, where long life, tactile matte PBT, and stable legibility over years are important.
— Laser engraving. Burning/removing the top coating layer with a beam to form a highly precise symbol. The symbols last for years, but over time the paint fill can wear off and contrast can drop in high-contact areas. Advantages include thin fonts, clean contours, RGB compatibility, and affordable cost. Compared to double-shot, engraving is cheaper and more flexible in design, but not “forever”; against dye-sub it wins with backlighting, but loses in tactile uniformity and longevity. Typical applications include mass-market office and gaming models with backlighting, as well as bilingual layouts where the Latin legends are made with a more durable technology and Cyrillic is added by laser.
Volume control
Volume control methodprovided in the keyboard (if such a possibility is provided at all).
— Through Fn. Adjustment using the Fn key (see above): increasing and decreasing the volume is carried out by simultaneously pressing Fn and one of the main keys of the keyboard (usually from the F1 — F12 row), The main advantage of this control is that it allows you not to overload the keyboard with additional controls — this, in turn, has a positive effect on the dimensions and cost. The disadvantage is the need to simultaneously press two keys, which is not always convenient.
— Additional keys. Control with additional keys specially designed for working with volume. A very convenient and practical option: additional keys are usually clearly labeled, while they take up less space and are cheaper than a wheel or a touch slider (see below).
— Wheel. Control by means of a mechanical wheel, the rotation of which up and down or left and right provides a change in volume. A fairly user-friendly option — visual, intuitive and accessible even blindly. At the same time, the wheel can take up quite a lot of space, and it significantly affects the cost of the keyboard.
— Touch slider. Management using a touch surface, the movement of a finger in one direction or another. The sensor takes up minimal space, looks neat...and generally fits well with the overall design of the keyboard, but it is not cheap. Therefore, this option is extremely rare, mainly in high-end gaming or multimedia keyboards.
— Through Fn. Adjustment using the Fn key (see above): increasing and decreasing the volume is carried out by simultaneously pressing Fn and one of the main keys of the keyboard (usually from the F1 — F12 row), The main advantage of this control is that it allows you not to overload the keyboard with additional controls — this, in turn, has a positive effect on the dimensions and cost. The disadvantage is the need to simultaneously press two keys, which is not always convenient.
— Additional keys. Control with additional keys specially designed for working with volume. A very convenient and practical option: additional keys are usually clearly labeled, while they take up less space and are cheaper than a wheel or a touch slider (see below).
— Wheel. Control by means of a mechanical wheel, the rotation of which up and down or left and right provides a change in volume. A fairly user-friendly option — visual, intuitive and accessible even blindly. At the same time, the wheel can take up quite a lot of space, and it significantly affects the cost of the keyboard.
— Touch slider. Management using a touch surface, the movement of a finger in one direction or another. The sensor takes up minimal space, looks neat...and generally fits well with the overall design of the keyboard, but it is not cheap. Therefore, this option is extremely rare, mainly in high-end gaming or multimedia keyboards.
Built-in memory
The presence in the keyboard of its own built-in memory.
This feature is found mainly in high-end models of game specialization(see "Intended use"). The built-in memory in such keyboards is mainly used to store user settings — for example, the set functions of programmable keys — as well as macros (sequences of commands that are activated by pressing one or two buttons). Anyway, the presence of its own memory means extended options for customizing the keyboard.
This feature is found mainly in high-end models of game specialization(see "Intended use"). The built-in memory in such keyboards is mainly used to store user settings — for example, the set functions of programmable keys — as well as macros (sequences of commands that are activated by pressing one or two buttons). Anyway, the presence of its own memory means extended options for customizing the keyboard.













