Comparison DJI Goggles Integra vs DJI Goggles 2
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| DJI Goggles Integra | DJI Goggles 2 | |
| Compare prices 1 | Compare prices 2 | |
| TOP sellers | ||
Automatic selection of frequency 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. Removable antennas. Compatibility: DJI Mavic 3 Pro, DJI Mavic 3 Pro Cine, DJI Mavic 3, DJI Mavic 3 Cine, DJI Mavic 3 Classic, and DJI Mini 3 Pro. Compared to DJI Goggles 2, it lacks: diopter adjustment (replaceable lenses are used), wireless streaming function, dot diode screen, speaker and 3.5 mm audio jack. | Automatic selection of frequency 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. Supports DJI O3+ with DJI Avata or DJI O3 Air Unit. Removable antennas. Diopter adjustment from +2.0 to -8.0. Possibility to use with a smartphone as a home theater. Compatibility: DJI Motion Controller, DJI RC Motion 2, DJI FPV Remote Controller 2, DJI FPV, DJI Mavic 3 Pro, DJI Mavic 3 Pro Cine, DJI Mavic 3, DJI Mavic 3 Cine, DJI Mavic 3 Classic, and DJI Mini 3 Pro . | |
| Device type | FPV goggles | FPV goggles |
| Purpose (compatibility) | quadcopter (drone) | quadcopter (drone) |
Specs | ||
| Screen resolution | 1920x1080 px | 1920x1080 px |
| Field of view | 102 ° | 102 ° |
| Refresh rate | 100 fps | 100 fps |
Multimedia | ||
| Bluetooth | v 5.0 | v 5.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) |
| Headphone output |  |  |
General | ||
| Control | button controls | touch controls |
| Battery capacity | 1800 mAh | |
| Operating time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Material | plastic | plastic |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 205x104x104 mm | 197x105x104 mm |
| Weight | 410 g | 290 g |
| Added to E-Catalog | november 2023 | november 2023 |
Compare DJI Goggles Integra and Goggles 2
The DJI Goggles Integra and DJI Goggles 2 are designed for quadcopters (FPV) and have the same display resolution of 1920x1080 pixels and a field of view of 102°. However, Goggles 2 offers a headphone output, which is not present in Goggles Integra. Goggles 2 features touch control, whereas Goggles Integra has button control. Goggles 2 also supports diopter adjustment from +2.0 to -8.0, making them more versatile for users with varying vision. Both devices have a battery life of about 2 hours, but Goggles 2 is lighter, weighing 290 g compared to 410 g for Goggles Integra.
Price comparison
You may be interested in
My comparisons
DJI Goggles Integra often compared
DJI Goggles 2 often compared
Glossary
Headphone output
Availability in points of an exit for connection of earphones. Most often, the role of such a connector is played by a standard 3.5 mm mini-jack socket.
A full-fledged "immersion" in the virtual world requires not only a picture on the screen, but also an appropriate sound accompaniment, for which headphones are the best option. Its own headphone output allows you to connect wired "ears" directly to the glasses — it is much more convenient and safer during use than connecting headphones to a computer or set-top box. However, independent devices can also have such a connector (see "Purpose").
Note that there are VR glasses with their own built-in headphones, but this option is more convenient: it allows you to select the “ears” separately, according to the user’s own preferences.
A full-fledged "immersion" in the virtual world requires not only a picture on the screen, but also an appropriate sound accompaniment, for which headphones are the best option. Its own headphone output allows you to connect wired "ears" directly to the glasses — it is much more convenient and safer during use than connecting headphones to a computer or set-top box. However, independent devices can also have such a connector (see "Purpose").
Note that there are VR glasses with their own built-in headphones, but this option is more convenient: it allows you to select the “ears” separately, according to the user’s own preferences.
Control
The type of control provided in the design of the glasses.
Note that in this case we are talking exclusively about our own controls installed directly on the body of the glasses; many models are equipped with external controllers (see "Remote control"), but they are not taken into account in this case.
- Button. Control with classic buttons. The main advantage of this option is simplicity and low cost, while its functionality is quite enough to work with basic functions like menu navigation. On the other hand, the buttons require some effort when pressed, which can be somewhat inconvenient, especially when using the controls intensively. However, most often this disadvantage is still not fundamental.
- Touch. Control using sensors that are sensitive to touch and do not require pressing (unlike buttons). In the simplest models, these are separate sensors, the functions of which are similar to the same buttons. In more advanced devices, entire touch panels can be provided, for example, allowing you to control the cursor visible through the glasses and use special gestures. Anyway, this type of control is more advanced than push-button, however, it is more expensive, and therefore less common.
Note that in this case we are talking exclusively about our own controls installed directly on the body of the glasses; many models are equipped with external controllers (see "Remote control"), but they are not taken into account in this case.
- Button. Control with classic buttons. The main advantage of this option is simplicity and low cost, while its functionality is quite enough to work with basic functions like menu navigation. On the other hand, the buttons require some effort when pressed, which can be somewhat inconvenient, especially when using the controls intensively. However, most often this disadvantage is still not fundamental.
- Touch. Control using sensors that are sensitive to touch and do not require pressing (unlike buttons). In the simplest models, these are separate sensors, the functions of which are similar to the same buttons. In more advanced devices, entire touch panels can be provided, for example, allowing you to control the cursor visible through the glasses and use special gestures. Anyway, this type of control is more advanced than push-button, however, it is more expensive, and therefore less common.