USA
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Networking   /   Wi-Fi Equipment

Comparison TP-LINK Archer A8 vs TP-LINK Archer C80

Add to comparison
TP-LINK Archer A8
TP-LINK Archer C80
TP-LINK Archer A8TP-LINK Archer C80
from $59.99 
Expecting restock
Compare prices 4
TOP sellers
Main
Works in two modes, router and access point.
Product typerouterrouter
Data input (WAN-port)
Ethernet (RJ45)
Ethernet (RJ45)
Wireless Wi-Fi connection
Wi-Fi standards
Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g)
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g)
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Frequency band
2.4GHz
5 GHz
2.4GHz
5 GHz
Operating rangesdual band (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz)dual band (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz)
Wireless speed 2.4 GHz600 Mbps600 Mbps
Wireless speed 5 GHz1300 Mbps1300 Mbps
Connection and LAN
WAN
1 port
1 Gbps
1 port
1 Gbps
LAN
4 ports
1 Gbps
4 ports
1 Gbps
Antenna and transmitter
Number of antennas34
Antenna typeexternalexternal
MU-MIMO
Transmitter power23 dBm
23 dBm /FCC: 30 dBm/
Signal strength 2.4 GHz20 dBm20 dBm
Signal strength 5 GHz23 dBm23 dBm
Hardware
CPUMediaTek TP1900BN
CPU cores1
Clock Speed1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
RAM64 MB
Flash memory4 MB
Functions
Features
NAT
Beamforming
firewall
NAT
Beamforming
firewall
More features
DHCP server
VPN
DDNS
DMZ
DHCP server
VPN
DDNS
DMZ
Security
Safety standards
WPA
WEP
WPA2
 
WPA
WEP
WPA2
802.1x
General
Operating temperature0 °C ~ +40 °C0 °C ~ +40 °C
Dimensions243x161x33 mm215x117x32 mm
Color
Added to E-Catalogaugust 2020july 2020

Number of antennas

The total number of antennas (of all types — see below) provided in the design of the device.

In modern Wi-Fi equipment, this indicator can be different: in addition to the simplest devices with 1 antenna, there are models where this number is 2, 3, 4 and even more. The point of using multiple antennas is twofold. Firstly, if there are several external devices per antenna, they have to share the bandwidth among themselves, and the actual communication speed for each subscriber drops accordingly. Secondly, such a design may also be required when communicating with one external device — to work with MU-MIMO technology (see below), which allows you to fully realize the capabilities of modern Wi-Fi standards.

Anyway, more antennas, usually, means a more advanced and functional device. On the other hand, this parameter significantly affects the cost; so specifically looking for equipment with numerous antennas makes sense mainly when the speed and stability of communication are critical.

Note that antennas intended for mobile communications may also be considered in this clause. So when choosing a model with support for mobile networks, it's ok to clarify this point.

CPU

The model of the processor installed in the device. The processor is responsible for processing network traffic and running software. Knowing its name, you can get more detailed data on the speed capabilities of the equipment and understand how much such a powerful or, on the contrary, mediocre element is needed on board. In new models of Wi-Fi equipment, coprocessors or so-called NPU modules are often installed, which relieve the load from the main processor.

Most often, Wi-Fi equipment is equipped with processors from Broadcom, MediaTek, Realtek and Qualcomm.

CPU cores

The number of cores in the processor installed in the device. The core in this case refers to the part of the processor that executes one thread of instructions. Accordingly, the presence of multiple cores (there are 2-core models, 3 and on 4 cores) allows you to work with multiple threads simultaneously, which has a positive effect on performance.

RAM

The amount of random access memory (RAM) provided in the device. The amount of "RAM" is one of the indicators of the power of the device: the larger it is, the higher the speed and the better the device will cope with "heavy" tasks. Among the values, there can be 128 MB, 256 MB, 512 MB and high scores in 1 GB and 2 GB.

Flash memory

The amount of memory allocated for the operation of the operating system on board the router. It stores the OS and the control programme. Note that Flash memory is not available for use by the end user.

Safety standards

— WPA. An encryption protocol created as a temporary solution to the most critical vulnerabilities of the WEP described below. It uses a more advanced encryption algorithm, as well as the transmission of passwords in encrypted form. However, the reliability of this standard also turned out to be insufficient, so an improved version, WPA2, was developed.

— WEP. Historically, the first encryption protocol used in wireless networks. It uses encryption from 64-bit to 256-bit, the latter option is considered strong in itself, however, the standard's own vulnerabilities allow a specialist to hack such a communication channel without much difficulty. As a result, WEP is completely obsolete, its support is provided mainly for compatibility with the simplest equipment (especially since it is technically easy to provide this support).

— WPA2. The most popular security standard in modern Wi-Fi equipment. At one time, it became an important update to the original WPA: in particular, the AES CCMP algorithm was introduced into WPA2, which is extremely difficult to crack. Over time, however, some vulnerabilities were identified in this protocol, which led to the development of a more advanced WPA3; however, WPA3 is just beginning to be massively implemented, and in most Wi-Fi devices, WPA2 remains the most advanced standard.
It is worth noting two nuances. First, WPA2 is available in two versions — personal and corporate; in this case, we are talking about pers...onal, corporate options are placed in paragraph "802.1x". Secondly, support for this standard is guaranteed to also be compatible with WEP and original WPA.

WPA3. A fundamental improvement to WPA2, introduced in 2018, addressing weaknesses identified in WPA2 in the 14 years since it went live. This standard introduced four key innovations:
  • Improved security for public networks. Unlike its predecessor, WPA3 encrypts the traffic between the gadget and the router / access point, even if the network is public and does not require a password.
  • Protection against the KRACK vulnerability, which allowed hacking the WPA2 communication channel at the time the connection was established. The SAE algorithm is responsible for this protection — more advanced than the previously used PSK. In particular, when establishing a connection via SAE, both devices are considered equal (in PSK, the receiver and transmitter were clearly defined) — this does not allow an attacker to “wedge” between devices using KRACK methods.
  • Easy Connect feature — simplifies connection to Wi-Fi networks for devices that do not have displays (in particular, smart home components). Each of these devices will have a QR code on the body, and to connect to the network, it will be enough to scan this code using a smartphone / tablet already connected to this network. However this function is not directly related to WPA3, WPA2 is sufficient for its operation; however, mass adoption of Easy Connect should be expected at the same time as WPA3.
  • Improved encryption algorithms for sensitive data, suitable even for government agencies and defense enterprises. However, this feature is relevant mainly for the corporate version of WPA3 — and support for this version is indicated as "802.1x" (see below, in this case we are talking mainly about the personal version of this standard).
In many devices, upgrading from WPA2 to WPA3 can be done in software by installing a new firmware version. However, if support for this protocol is important to you, it is best to choose equipment where such support is initially provided. Also note that the presence of WPA3 is almost guaranteed to also be compatible with WPA2.

— 802.1x. In this case, it implies support for corporate security standards — most often the corresponding versions of the WPA2 protocols, in new devices also WPA3. For example, if the specifications indicate "802.1x" in addition to "WPA3", then this means that this model supports both personal and corporate versions of WPA3. As for the differences between similar versions, one of them is the support for a separate authentication server in corporate protocols. In other words, when using this function, data on accounts and access rights are stored separately from Wi-Fi equipment, on a special secure server, and it is this server that in each case checks the data of the connected equipment and decides whether to allow or deny access.
TP-LINK Archer C80 often compared