USA
Catalog   /   Climate, Heating, Water Heating   /   Heating & Cooling   /   Air Conditioners

Comparison Samsung AR09BXFAMWKNUA 25 m² vs Samsung Arise Mass AR09BXHCNWKNUA 25 m²

Add to comparison
Samsung AR09BXFAMWKNUA 25 m²
Samsung Arise Mass AR09BXHCNWKNUA 25 m²
Samsung AR09BXFAMWKNUA 25 m²Samsung Arise Mass AR09BXHCNWKNUA 25 m²
Outdated ProductOutdated Product
TOP sellers
Main
To reduce drafts, WinFree technology is used, many small holes contribute to a more even distribution of air.
Typesplit systemsplit system
Installationwallwall
Nominal capacity BTU90009000
In box
indoor unit
outdoor unit
indoor unit
outdoor unit
Performance
Operating modescooling/heating/dehumidification/ventilationcooling/heating/dehumidification/ventilation
Recommended room area25 m²25 m²
Power consumption (cooling/heating)700/840 W700/840 W
Cooling capacity2500 W2500 W
Heating capacity3200 W3200 W
Air flow630 m³/h630 m³/h
Dehumidification1 L/h1 L/h
Noise level (max/min)37/19 dB37/19 dB
Efficiency
Cooling EER3.573.2
Heating COP3.813.57
Seasonal cooling SEER6.76.7
Seasonal heating SCOP44
Energy efficiency EER (cooling)AA
Energy efficiency COP (heating)AB
Energy efficiency SEER (cooling)A++A++
Energy efficiency SCOP (heating)A+A+
Features
Functions
inverter
automode
timer
night mode
auto restart
vertical blinds drive
self-cleaning
self-diagnosis
control via smartphone
inverter
automode
timer
night mode
auto restart
vertical blinds drive
self-cleaning
self-diagnosis
control via smartphone
Specs
Display++
Refrigerant typeR32R32
Maximum height difference between units8 m8 m
Maximum pipe length15 m15 m
Min. T for cooling mode-10 °C-10 °C
Maximum T for cooling mode46 °C46 °C
Min. T for heating mode-15 °C-15 °C
Filters
antibacterial
antibacterial
General specs
Indoor unit dimensions (WxHxD)820x299x215 mm820x299x215 mm
Dimensions of window/outdoor unit (WxHxD)660x475x242 mm660x475x242 mm
Indoor unit weight9 kg9 kg
Outdoor unit weight23 kg23 kg
Color
Added to E-Catalogapril 2022april 2022

Cooling EER

Cooling factor EER provided by the air conditioner. It is calculated as the ratio of the useful operating power of the air conditioner in cooling mode to the electricity consumption. For example, a device that delivers 6 kW of operating power in cooling mode and consumes 2 kW will have an EER 6/2 = 3.

The higher this indicator, the more economical the air conditioner is and the higher its cooling energy efficiency class (see below). Each class has its clear requirements for EER.

It is worth noting that this indicator is considered not very reliable, and in the European Union another coefficient has been introduced that is closer to practice — SEER. See Energy efficiency SEER (cooling) for more details.

Heating COP

The heating coefficient COP provided by the air conditioner. It is calculated as the ratio of the heat output of the air conditioner in heating mode to the electricity consumption. For example, if a device consumes 2 kW and produces 5 kW of thermal power, then the COP will be 5/2 = 2.5.

The higher this indicator, the more economical the air conditioner is and the higher its energy efficiency class when heating (see below). Each class has its own clear COP requirements.

Note that COP values are usually higher than the values of another important coefficient — EER (see above). It is due to the technical features of the air conditioners.

It is also worth mentioning that since 2013, a more advanced and closer-to-practice coefficient, SCOP, has been put into use in Europe. See "Energy efficiency SCOP (heating)" for more details.

Energy efficiency COP (heating)

The general energy efficiency class that the air conditioner corresponds to when operating in heating.

This parameter is indicated by letters from A (highest efficiency) and beyond. It is directly related to the value of the COP coefficient (see "Heating COP"): each energy efficiency class corresponds to a certain range of coefficients (for example, C — from 3.2 to 3.4). Specific coefficient values for each class can be found in special tables; here we note that more efficient air conditioners are more expensive, but this difference can pay off due to less electricity consumption.