Comparison Ferraboli Pic Nic vs Ferraboli Camping
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Ferraboli Pic Nic | Ferraboli Camping | |
from $43.20 up to $51.60 | from $55.20 up to $65.76 | |
| TOP sellers | ||
Lattice with foldable handle included. Easy assembly without auxiliary connections. Grid height adjustable. There are no slots for the installation of skewers. | ||
| Type | grill BBQ | grill BBQ |
| Fuel (source) | coals (solid fuel) | coals (solid fuel) |
| Design | folding | folding |
Features | ||
| Features | heat level adjustment ash cleaning system foldable legs carrying handle | heat level adjustment ash cleaning system foldable legs carrying handle |
| In box | grill | grill |
General | ||
| Shape | rectangular | rectangular |
| Height | 730 mm | 730 mm |
| Dimensions (WxD) | 280x520 mm | 280x520 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 5.5 kg |
| Added to E-Catalog | june 2014 | june 2014 |
Compare Ferraboli Pic Nic and Camping
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Glossary
Weight
The total weight of the product, taking into account the main elements of equipment (lids, canopy, food stands, etc.), but excluding fuel.
It is worth evaluating this indicator taking into account the type of device. So, the most compact barbecues and barbecue grills can weigh 4-6 kg or even less(in camping barbecues, the weight does not exceed these values at all); 7 – 10 kg for such models is considered an average, and larger values \u200b\u200bare typical mainly for large stationary structures of high capacity. But ceramic grills and tandoors are, by definition, massive: in the first case, even in the lightest models, the weight exceeds 10 kg, in the second it is usually more than 50 kg.
Anyway, note that both small and significant weight have their advantages. So, with similar functionality, a lighter device will be more convenient to transport, but this convenience will have to be paid for by reducing the height (which affects convenience), reducing the capacity and/or thinner walls of the furnace (which reduces reliability for metal walls, worsens for ceramic ones). efficiency). Conversely, a heavier structure will be more reliable, durable, often more spacious, but at the same time less convenient when moving from place to place, and often more cumbersome.
It is worth evaluating this indicator taking into account the type of device. So, the most compact barbecues and barbecue grills can weigh 4-6 kg or even less(in camping barbecues, the weight does not exceed these values at all); 7 – 10 kg for such models is considered an average, and larger values \u200b\u200bare typical mainly for large stationary structures of high capacity. But ceramic grills and tandoors are, by definition, massive: in the first case, even in the lightest models, the weight exceeds 10 kg, in the second it is usually more than 50 kg.
Anyway, note that both small and significant weight have their advantages. So, with similar functionality, a lighter device will be more convenient to transport, but this convenience will have to be paid for by reducing the height (which affects convenience), reducing the capacity and/or thinner walls of the furnace (which reduces reliability for metal walls, worsens for ceramic ones). efficiency). Conversely, a heavier structure will be more reliable, durable, often more spacious, but at the same time less convenient when moving from place to place, and often more cumbersome.