Size
The total size of the pan (not including the handle). For round models, in this case, the outer diameter is indicated, for square ones — most often the outer size on one of the sides. For sets of several frying pans (see "Quantity in a set"), respectively, data are given for all items from the set.
The smallest modern frying pans are
18 cm,
16 cm, or even
less. Most models fall in the 20 to 28 cm range, with even diameters being much more popular than odd ones. So, products with sizes of
20,
22,
24,
26 and
28 cm are produced noticeably more than models of
21,
23,
25,
27 and 29 cm. And in the largest frying pans, the diameter is
30 cm or more ; There are many such models on the market.
In general, the size primarily depends on the total capacity of the pan and the ability to place certain ingredients on it (a large piece of meat, a whole fish, etc.). The actual volume, however, is also associated with the height of the sides (see below); however, frying pans of the same type tend to be similar in this height, and their capa
...city is characterized primarily by their diameter. In addition, the overall dimensions of the cookware also determine the possibility of using it in a particular oven (if there is such a possibility in principle, see "Functions and Capabilities"); but compatibility with a particular burner is best assessed by the directly claimed bottom diameter (see below) — it is usually less than the total diameter, with rare exceptions.Bottom thickness
In general, a thick bottom is considered more preferable than a thin one: the thicker the bottom, the more evenly the heat is distributed over it, the higher the quality of cooking and the lower the likelihood that the product will burn in some places. In addition, thick material is less prone to deformation from strong heat and temperature changes. True, the massive bottom also affects the weight of the product, but in most cases this moment is not significant - on the contrary, it contributes to the stability of the pan and reduces the risk of tipping it over by negligence. Of the unequivocal disadvantages, only the high cost
of thick pans can be noted, but it is usually justified taking into account performance.
It is believed that for most cases a bottom thickness of at least 5 mm is desirable. However, in pans for pancakes (see "Type") and other "quick" fried foods, smaller indicators are also allowed - from 3 mm. As a rule, the bottom thickness corresponds to the wall thickness (see below), but exceptions are possible.
Wall thickness
The thickness of the walls of the pan.
Thick material weighs more and costs more, but these disadvantages are outweighed by a number of advantages. Firstly,
thicker walls distribute and retain heat more evenly, and also reduce the likelihood of overheating; all this is especially important when stewing, simmering and other similar cooking methods. Secondly, a large weight reduces the likelihood of overturning the pan, inadvertently hitting it. Thirdly, thick material better resists strong heat and temperature changes.
The minimum indicator for a quality pan is a wall thickness of 3 mm, and ideally it should be 5 mm or more.
