USA
Catalog   /   Home & Renovation   /   Cookware & Cutlery   /   Kitchen Cookware   /   Pans

Comparison Biol Cooper 24072P 24 cm vs Biol Optima 24047P 24 cm

Add to comparison
Biol Cooper 24072P 24 cm
Biol Optima 24047P 24 cm
Biol Cooper 24072P 24 cmBiol Optima 24047P 24 cm
Outdated ProductOutdated Product
TOP sellers
Typeclassicclassic
Specs
Size
24 cm
24 cm
Bottom diameter19.4 cm
Bottom thickness4 mm
Wall height6 cm4.5 cm
Weight0.86 kg
Pan materialcast aluminiumcast aluminium
Handle material
bakelite /with soft-touch coating/
bakelite /with soft-touch coating/
Non-stick coating++
Features
dishwasher compatible
dishwasher compatible
Country of originUkraineUkraine
Color
Added to E-Catalogmay 2018may 2017

Bottom diameter

The diameter of the bottom of a pan that has a round shape.

This parameter is necessary first of all in order to assess the compatibility of the pan with a particular burner on the stove. It is especially relevant if the product is planned to be used on an electric stove: the diameter of the burner must be at least not less than the diameter of the bottom, otherwise the heating will turn out to be uneven and inefficient. And in induction electric stoves (see "Functions and capabilities — Induction bottom"), these diameters must match at all. The selection of suitable frying pans is somewhat simplified by the fact that modern electric stoves usually have burners of different diameters, and in some models the heaters can even be adjusted in size — up to autofocus in separate induction cookers). However, even in such cases, it's ok to clarify whether the pan fits into the range of suitable sizes.

Bottom thickness

In general, a thick bottom is considered more preferable than a thin one: the thicker the bottom, the more evenly the heat is distributed over it, the higher the quality of cooking and the lower the likelihood that the product will burn in some places. In addition, thick material is less prone to deformation from strong heat and temperature changes. True, the massive bottom also affects the weight of the product, but in most cases this moment is not significant - on the contrary, it contributes to the stability of the pan and reduces the risk of tipping it over by negligence. Of the unequivocal disadvantages, only the high cost of thick pans can be noted, but it is usually justified taking into account performance.

It is believed that for most cases a bottom thickness of at least 5 mm is desirable. However, in pans for pancakes (see "Type") and other "quick" fried foods, smaller indicators are also allowed - from 3 mm. As a rule, the bottom thickness corresponds to the wall thickness (see below), but exceptions are possible.

Wall height

The height of the walls is selected by the manufacturer depending on the type of pan (see above) and its size, however, similar products may vary in the height of the sides. In such cases, it is worth considering the features of the intended application. So, high sides are convenient for stewing, preparing sauces and other types of cooking that involve a large amount of liquid; in addition, they allow you to fit more content. On the other hand, deep pans are more expensive and heavier. The shallow depth, in turn, makes it easy to flip pancakes, omelettes and other similar dishes, but reduces capacity.
Biol Optima 24047P often compared