Comparison AKG K92 vs AKG K52
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| AKG K92 | AKG K52 | |
| Compare prices 10 | from $60.24 | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
Connection and design | ||
| Features | monitor | monitor |
| Design | overhead, closed full size Over-Ear headband auto-adjustment | overhead, closed full size Over-Ear headband auto-adjustment |
| Connection type | wired | wired |
| Connection | mini-Jack (3.5 mm) Jack (6.35 mm) | mini-Jack (3.5 mm) Jack (6.35 mm) |
| Plug | straight | straight |
| Cable supply | single-sided | single-sided |
| Cable length | 3 m | 2.5 m |
| Cable type | round | round |
Specs | ||
| Impedance | 32 Ohm | 32 Ohm |
| Power | 200 mW | 200 mW |
| Frequency range | 16 – 22000 Hz | 18 – 20000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | 110 dB |
| Speaker size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Emitter type | dynamic | dynamic |
General | ||
| Ear cushion material | leatherette | leatherette |
| Weight | 200 g | 200 g |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | march 2016 | march 2016 |
Compare AKG K92 and K52
Headphones AKG K92 and AKG K52 have a similar design and are intended for monitoring, but there are several key differences between them. The K92 offers a wider frequency range (16 – 22000 Hz) compared to the K52 (18 – 20000 Hz), which may provide better high-frequency reproduction. The sensitivity of the K92 is higher (113 dB versus 110 dB for the K52), which could mean a louder sound. The cable length of the K92 is 3 meters, whereas the K52 is 2.5 meters. In reviews, users note that the K92 provides higher quality sound, especially in the high frequencies, while the K52 is praised for its convenience and comfort during prolonged use.
You may be interested in
AKG K52 often compared
Glossary
Cable length
The length of the cable supplied with the headphones with the appropriate connectivity.
The optimal cable length depends on the planned format of the "ears". So, for pocket gadgets, 1 metre or less is often enough, for a computer it is already desirable to have a wire for 1 – 2 m, and preferably 2 – 3 m. And models with a longer cable length — 3 – 5 m or even more — are mainly designed for specific tasks, such as connecting to a TV or using in recording studios.
Recall that in some models the cable is removable (see below) and can be replaced if necessary with a longer or shorter one. Also note that there are extension cables that allow you to increase the length of the main wire; such a cable may even be included in the delivery, this point (and the length of the additional cable) is usually specified in the notes.
The optimal cable length depends on the planned format of the "ears". So, for pocket gadgets, 1 metre or less is often enough, for a computer it is already desirable to have a wire for 1 – 2 m, and preferably 2 – 3 m. And models with a longer cable length — 3 – 5 m or even more — are mainly designed for specific tasks, such as connecting to a TV or using in recording studios.
Recall that in some models the cable is removable (see below) and can be replaced if necessary with a longer or shorter one. Also note that there are extension cables that allow you to increase the length of the main wire; such a cable may even be included in the delivery, this point (and the length of the additional cable) is usually specified in the notes.
Frequency range
The range of sound frequencies that headphones can reproduce.
The wider this range, the more fully the headphones reproduce the spectrum of sound frequencies, the lower the likelihood that too low or too high frequencies will be inaccessible. However, there are some nuances to consider here. First of all, let us remind you that the perceptual range of the human ear is on average from 16 Hz to 22 kHz, and for the complete picture it is enough for headphones to cover this range. However, modern models can significantly exceed these boundaries: in many devices the lower threshold does not exceed 15 Hz, or even 10 Hz, and the upper limit can reach 25 kHz, 30 kHz and even more. Such wide ranges in themselves do not provide practical advantages, but they usually indicate a high class of headphones, and are sometimes given only for advertising purposes.
The second important point is that a wide frequency range in itself is not a guarantee of good sound: sound quality also depends on a number of parameters, primarily the amplitude-frequency response of the headphones.
The wider this range, the more fully the headphones reproduce the spectrum of sound frequencies, the lower the likelihood that too low or too high frequencies will be inaccessible. However, there are some nuances to consider here. First of all, let us remind you that the perceptual range of the human ear is on average from 16 Hz to 22 kHz, and for the complete picture it is enough for headphones to cover this range. However, modern models can significantly exceed these boundaries: in many devices the lower threshold does not exceed 15 Hz, or even 10 Hz, and the upper limit can reach 25 kHz, 30 kHz and even more. Such wide ranges in themselves do not provide practical advantages, but they usually indicate a high class of headphones, and are sometimes given only for advertising purposes.
The second important point is that a wide frequency range in itself is not a guarantee of good sound: sound quality also depends on a number of parameters, primarily the amplitude-frequency response of the headphones.
Sensitivity
Rated headphone sensitivity. Technically, this is the volume at which they sound when a certain standard signal from the amplifier is connected to them. Thus, sensitivity is one of the parameters that determine the overall volume of the headphones: the higher it is, the louder the sound will be with the same input signal level and other things being equal. However, we must not forget that the volume level also depends on the resistance (impedance, see above); moreover, it is worth choosing “ears” for a specific device first by impedance, and only then by sensitivity. In this case, one parameter can be compensated for by another: for example, a model with high resistance and high sensitivity can work even on a relatively weak amplifier.
As for specific figures, headphones with indicators of 100 dB or less are designed mainly for use in a quiet environment (in some similar models, the sensitivity does not exceed 90 dB). For use on the street, in transport and other similar conditions, it is desirable to have more sensitive headphones — about 101 – 105 dB, or even 110 dB. And in some models, this figure can reach 116 – 120 dB. and even more.
It is also worth noting that this parameter is relevant only for a wired connection according to the analogue standard — for example, via a 3.5 mm mini-...jack. When using digital interfaces like USB and wireless channels like Bluetooth, the sound is processed in the built-in headphone converter, and if you plan to mainly use this kind of application, you can not pay much attention to sensitivity.
As for specific figures, headphones with indicators of 100 dB or less are designed mainly for use in a quiet environment (in some similar models, the sensitivity does not exceed 90 dB). For use on the street, in transport and other similar conditions, it is desirable to have more sensitive headphones — about 101 – 105 dB, or even 110 dB. And in some models, this figure can reach 116 – 120 dB. and even more.
It is also worth noting that this parameter is relevant only for a wired connection according to the analogue standard — for example, via a 3.5 mm mini-...jack. When using digital interfaces like USB and wireless channels like Bluetooth, the sound is processed in the built-in headphone converter, and if you plan to mainly use this kind of application, you can not pay much attention to sensitivity.