USA
Catalog   /   Mobile Phones & Gadgets   /   Telephones & VoIP   /   Fax Machines

Comparison Panasonic KX-FT988 vs Panasonic KX-FT982

Add to comparison
Panasonic KX-FT988
Panasonic KX-FT982
Panasonic KX-FT988Panasonic KX-FT982
from $205.00
Outdated Product
from $124.12 up to $129.95
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
Paper sizerollroll
Print typethermal paperthermal paper
Handsetwiredwired
Copier
Specs
Modem speed9.6 Kbps9.6 Kbps
Print speed4 ppm4 ppm
Number of print tones6464
Paper cutter
Sending faxes
 /up to 20 recipients/
 /up to 20 recipients/
Delayed fax transmission
Received Fax Memory28 page28 page
Phone features
Caller ID
Speakerphone
Answering machine
Auto redial
Notebook /for 100 rooms/
Caller ID /Caller ID/
 
 
Auto redial
Notebook
General
Paper/cartridge replacement indicator
Auto feed tray capacity10 pages10 pages
Dimensions352х121х224 mm352х121х224 mm
Added to E-Catalognovember 2009november 2009

Paper cutter

A special device that automatically cuts paper after receiving and printing a fax message. Not found in faxes for standard paper, used in models with roll feed.

Phone features

Caller ID. Automatic caller ID. Allows you to find out the number of the caller and/or sender of the message.

Speakerphone. The ability to conduct a telephone conversation without using a handset, including — at a considerable distance from the fax.

Answering machine. The ability to leave a voice message for a caller who wants to send you a fax, as well as the ability to leave a response voice message.

Autodial. The ability to send a fax even in the absence of its operator — when the line is free or available.

Notebook. Allows you to store several numbers of recipients in the fax memory, quickly organize the reception / sending of messages, and also make mailings to several recipients at the same time (during one session).

Paper/cartridge replacement indicator

Lets you determine whether the cartridge needs replacing and whether the paper in tray needs replenishing (or inserting a new roll).
Panasonic KX-FT982 often compared