Comparison MIOL 81-170 50 L vs Hyundai HY 2050 50 L
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| MIOL 81-170 50 L | Hyundai HY 2050 50 L | |
from $135.60 up to $140.00 | from $214.60 up to $218.64 | |
| TOP sellers | ||
HYC 2050 — an updated version of the HY 2050 model, the characteristics do not differ | ||
| Compressor type | piston | piston |
| Design | oil-lubricated | oil-lubricated |
| Drive | direct | direct |
Specs | ||
| Input performance | 206 L/min | 250 L/min |
| Output performance | 200 L/min | |
| Rated pressure | 8 bar | 8 bar |
| Power | 1.8 kW | 1.8 kW |
| Rotation speed | 2800 rpm | 2800 rpm |
| Number of cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Number of steps | 1 | 1 |
| Receiver | horizontal | horizontal |
| Receiver volume | 50 L | 50 L |
| Power source | mains (230 V) | mains (230 V) |
General | ||
| Design features | transportation wheels | transportation wheels |
| Dimensions | 74x33x63 cm | |
| Weight | 31 kg | 34 kg |
| Added to E-Catalog | november 2013 | november 2013 |
Compare MIOL 81-170 and Hyundai HY 2050
You may be interested in
My comparisons
MIOL 81-170 often compared
Hyundai HY 2050 often compared
Glossary
Input performance
The amount of air that the compressor is able to process per unit of time; usually stated in liters per minute. Performance, along with pressure (see below), is one of the most important parameters: it is it that primarily determines how compatible the compressor will be with one or another pneumatic tool.
It is worth choosing a model according to this indicator in such a way that it can be guaranteed to “pull out” all the tools that can be connected at the same time. Air consumption is usually directly indicated in the characteristics of each tool, and it is quite simple to calculate the total requirement. However, due to the design features, the compressor must have a certain performance margin; the specific value of this stock depends on a number of nuances.
The main point is that some companies indicate for their units the performance at the outlet (how much air is supplied to the tool), while others indicate at the inlet (how much air the compressor sucks in). Since no compressor is perfect, part of the air is inevitably lost during the compression process, so the amount of air at the outlet will always be less than at the inlet. Accordingly, if the output performance is indicated in the characteristics, a margin of 10-20% is recommended, and if the input is 35-40%.
There are also more complex techniques that allow you to more accurately derive the required performance depending on the characteristics of specific tools; they can be found in...special sources.
It is worth choosing a model according to this indicator in such a way that it can be guaranteed to “pull out” all the tools that can be connected at the same time. Air consumption is usually directly indicated in the characteristics of each tool, and it is quite simple to calculate the total requirement. However, due to the design features, the compressor must have a certain performance margin; the specific value of this stock depends on a number of nuances.
The main point is that some companies indicate for their units the performance at the outlet (how much air is supplied to the tool), while others indicate at the inlet (how much air the compressor sucks in). Since no compressor is perfect, part of the air is inevitably lost during the compression process, so the amount of air at the outlet will always be less than at the inlet. Accordingly, if the output performance is indicated in the characteristics, a margin of 10-20% is recommended, and if the input is 35-40%.
There are also more complex techniques that allow you to more accurately derive the required performance depending on the characteristics of specific tools; they can be found in...special sources.