USA
Catalog   /   Small Appliances   /   Kitchen   /   Electric Grills

Comparison Chudesnitsa ESH-1006 stainless steel vs Scarlett SC-KG22601 stainless steel

Add to comparison
Chudesnitsa ESH-1006 stainless steel
Scarlett SC-KG22601 stainless steel
Chudesnitsa ESH-1006 stainless steelScarlett SC-KG22601 stainless steel
Outdated ProductOutdated Product
TOP sellers
Main
Spare glass bulb for heating element
Skewers with heat-insulating handles. Clips from slipping meat. Convenient carrying handle.
Typebarbecuebarbecue
Power consumption1250 W1000 W
Design
Number of skewers6 pcs6 pcs
Tray for fat
Materialmetalmetal
General
Dimensions20х20х39 cm
Weight2.2 kg
Color
Added to E-Catalogjuly 2019july 2016

Power consumption

Rated power of the device — that is, the maximum power consumed during normal operation. With a low intensity of heating, energy consumption may be lower, but it is worth focus on this indicator.

The larger the surface area of the electric grill, the more energy is required for its efficient operation. In addition, for different cooking tasks, the intensity of heating (and, accordingly, the required power) will also be different. Therefore, only devices of the same type (see above) with a similar size of the working surface (see below) can be compared by this indicator. And in such a comparison, it is worth proceeding from the fact that higher power provides faster heating and more stable temperatures, but significantly affects the cost of the device. In addition, appliances more than 2 kW can create problems for old, “weak” wiring.

However, more than 2 kW is a high power for modern electric grills. Most of them have power consumption of 1,5 – 2 kW, quite a few models are in the range of 1 – 1,5 kW, and in the most low-power devices, this figure does not exceed 1 kW at all. At the same time, it is worth emphasizing separately that low power in itself does not mean low efficiency — often it turns out to be quite sufficient, taking into account the type and capacity of the grill.
Scarlett SC-KG22601 often compared