Comparison Fiskars 115360 vs Fiskars 115390
Add to comparison | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiskars 115360 | Fiskars 115390 | |
from $55.00 up to $55.08 | from $59.92 up to $94.56 | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
| Type | pole saw | pole saw |
| Design | two-handed | two-handed |
| Pole saw drive | internal drive | internal drive |
Specs | ||
| Max. cutting diameter | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Max. pole saw cutting height | 3.5 m | 4 m |
| Detachable blade | ||
| Blade adjustment | ||
| Spring | ||
General | ||
| Handle material | aluminium | aluminium |
| Pole | ||
| Length | 1580 mm | 2322 mm |
| Weight | 770 g | 1140 g |
| Added to E-Catalog | march 2016 | march 2016 |
Compare Fiskars 115360 and 115390
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Fiskars 115360 often compared
Fiskars 115390 often compared
Glossary
Max. pole saw cutting height
The maximum height that the pole saw (see "Type") can reach while standing on the ground, without the use of ladders or other attachments.
This parameter is usually indicated by manufacturers according to the following principle: “the length of the rod plus the height of a person with arms raised” (usually 2–2.5 m is taken for a person’s height). When choosing according to cutting heights, note that more “long-range” tools are usually heavier, bulkier and more expensive than relatively short counterparts. So the headroom does not hurt, but it should not be too large.
It is also worth noting that the cutting height is indicated relatively rarely — mainly in the largest and longest tools, where this figure is 3 m or more. In shorter models, the range can be derived using the already mentioned formula "length plus height of the user with arms raised."
This parameter is usually indicated by manufacturers according to the following principle: “the length of the rod plus the height of a person with arms raised” (usually 2–2.5 m is taken for a person’s height). When choosing according to cutting heights, note that more “long-range” tools are usually heavier, bulkier and more expensive than relatively short counterparts. So the headroom does not hurt, but it should not be too large.
It is also worth noting that the cutting height is indicated relatively rarely — mainly in the largest and longest tools, where this figure is 3 m or more. In shorter models, the range can be derived using the already mentioned formula "length plus height of the user with arms raised."




