USA
Catalog   /   Climate, Heating, Water Heating   /   Water Supply & Pumps   /   Submersible (Drainage) Pumps

Comparison Werk WQD15 vs Werk SPW12

Add to comparison
Werk WQD15
Werk SPW12
Werk WQD15Werk SPW12
from $55.92
Outdated Product
from $51.93 up to $69.13
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
Suitable forwaste waterwaste water
Specs
Maximum performance
18000 L/h /maximum/
18000 L/h
Maximum head
20 m /maximum/
14 m /maximum/
Max. pressure5 bar
Maximum immersion depth5 m5 m
Maximum particle size30 mm35 mm
Dry run protection
Grinder
Float switch
Suction systemsingle-stagesingle-stage
Outlet size2"1"
Engine
Maximum power2500 W2200 W
Power sourceelectricelectric
Mains voltage230 V230 V
General specs
Protection class (IP)6868
Country of originGermanyGermany
Pump housing materialcast ironstainless steel
Impeller / auger materialbrassstainless steel
Weight19 kg18 kg
Added to E-Catalogseptember 2016march 2015

Maximum head

The maximum head generated by the pump. This parameter is most often indicated in meters, by the height of the water column that the unit can create — in other words, by the height to which it can supply water. You can estimate the pressure created by the pump using a simple formula: every 10 m of head corresponds to a pressure of 1 bar.

It is worth choosing a pump according to this parameter, taking into account the height to which it should supply water, as well as adjusting for losses and the need for pressure in the water supply. To do this, it is necessary to determine the difference in height between the water level and the highest point of water intake, add another 10 to 30 m to this figure (depending on the pressure that needs to be obtained in the water supply), and multiply the result by 1.1 — this will be the minimum pressure required.

Max. pressure

The highest pressure that the pump is capable of creating during operation. This parameter is directly related to the maximum head (see above); however, it is less obvious, and therefore, it is indicated rarely.

Maximum particle size

The largest particle size that the pump can handle without problems. This size is the main indicator that determines the purpose of the device (see above); and in general, the larger it is, the more reliable the device, the lower the risk of damage if a foreign object enters the suction line. If the risk of the appearance of too large mechanical impurities is still high, additional protection can be provided with filters or grids at the inlet. However, such a measure should be considered only as a last resort, because from constant exposure to solid particles, the grids become clogged and deformed, which can lead to both clogging of the line and filter breakthrough.

Grinder

A device for grinding large mechanical impurities contained in the pumped liquid.

The grinder is installed at the pump inlet, in front of the main mechanism. Its task is to protect this mechanism from jamming and/or damage: the grinder crushes the impurities contained in the water into small particles, which the pump itself can handle without any problems.

This function is most relevant when working with heavily contaminated liquids; so most units with grinders are designed for dirty water or sewerage (see “Suitable for”). At the same time, a similar function can also be found in models for clean water — it increases overall reliability and provides an additional guarantee in case large particles do end up in the water.

Outlet size

The thread size for connecting a hose or pipe to the pump outlet. If there is a branch pipe with an external thread in the design, the size is indicated for it; if not, for the internal thread of the inlet.

Anyway, the dimensions of the pump outlet and the mounts on the hose/pipeline connected to it must match — otherwise, you will have to look for adapters. This size is specified in inches and fractions of an inch.

This parameter is relevant primarily for surface models.

Maximum power

Rated power of the pump motor. The more powerful the engine, the higher the performance of the unit, usually, the greater the pressure, suction height, etc. Of course, these parameters largely depend on other features (primarily the pump type, see above); but models similar in design can be compared in terms of power.

Note that high power, usually, increases the size, weight and cost of the pump, and also implies high costs of electricity or fuel (see "Power source"). Therefore, it is worth choosing a pump according to this parameter taking into account the specific situation; more detailed recommendations can be found in special sources.

Pump housing material

The material from which the pump housing is made. It is a structural element in which the working mechanism (impeller or auger) is installed. Note that the motor casing can be made of a different material — this is not important in this case; and in water pumps with the engine (see “Power source”), we are talking about the casing of the pump itself, and not about the support frame in which it is fixed.

The following options are most popular nowadays:

— Plastic. Inexpensive material that perfectly resists moisture and is not subject to corrosion. However, the reliability of plastic as a whole is not very high; the exception is special high-strength grades, but they are extremely rare in pumps (when strength is needed, metals are usually used). So plastic housing is mainly equipped with relatively simple and affordable models that are not designed for serious loads.

— Cast iron. An extremely popular material nowadays: cast iron is strong, reliable, durable and at the same time has a relatively low cost. However, in terms of corrosion resistance, this material is inferior to stainless steel (see below). Nevertheless, subject to the rules for operating the pump, the service life of the cast-iron housing is not inferior to the service life of most of the main components of the unit. Also note that such cases are quite massive, which makes transportation difficult; however, in some cases, a large weight is an advantage: it helps to dampen vibrati...ons.

— Stainless steel. By the name, one of the key advantages of stainless steel is high resistance to corrosion — and, accordingly, reliability and durability. On the other hand, this material also costs a little more than the same cast iron. The weight of such housing is somewhat less — this, again, can be both an advantage and a disadvantage, depending on the situation.

— Aluminium. Premium material. The aluminium alloys used in today's pumps are light, strong, durable, and virtually impervious to moisture, but cost accordingly.

— Brass. A fairly rare option found in some models of surface pumps. Brass is strong enough, reliable and resistant to moisture, but in most cases, it does not have key advantages over the same stainless steel or aluminium but costs a little more.

— Bronze. Another material similar to the brass described above is durable and practical but rarely used.

— Ceramics. A material found exclusively in sewage pumps in the form of toilet bowls (see "Pump design"). Most often, ceramics means vitreous china or more expensive and durable vitreous china — that is, the same materials as in ordinary toilets without built-in pumps.

Impeller / auger material

The material from which the main working element of the pump is made is an impeller, an auger or a membrane. This part is in direct contact with the pumped liquid, so its specs are key to the overall performance and capabilities of the pump.

— Plastic. Plastic is low-cost, and it is not subject to corrosion. It is believed that the mechanical strength of this material is generally low, and it does not tolerate contact with solid impurities. However, today there are many varieties of plastic — including special high-strength varieties that are suitable even for working with heavily polluted water or sewage. So plastic impellers/augers can be found in a variety of types of pumps; the overall quality and reliability of such parts, usually, depend on the price category of the unit.

— Cast iron. Solid, durable, reliable and, at the same time, relatively inexpensive material. In terms of corrosion resistance, cast iron is theoretically inferior to more advanced alloys like stainless steel or aluminium; however, subject to the operating rules, this point is not critical, and the service life of cast iron parts is no less than the total service life of the pump. The unequivocal disadvantages of this option include a large mass, which slightly increases the energy/fuel consumption during operation.

— Stainless steel. By the name, one of the key advantages of stainless steel is high resistance to corrosion — and, accordingly, reliability and durabili...ty. Such an alloy is somewhat more expensive than cast iron, but it also weighs less.

— Aluminium. Aluminium alloys combine strength, reliability, corrosion resistance and low weight. However, such materials are quite expensive — more expensive than the same stainless steel, not to mention cast iron.

— Brass. The varieties of brass used in pumps are distinguished by high strength and hardness, as well as insensitivity to moisture. Such materials are quite expensive, but this price is fully justified by the mentioned advantages. Therefore, in certain types of pumps — in particular, surface models and pressure tank units — brass impellers are very popular.

— Bronze. A material similar in many properties to the brass described above. However, bronze is used much less frequently — in particular, due to a slightly higher cost.

— Steel. Varieties of steel that are not related to stainless steel are used extremely rarely — in certain models of pumps for chemical liquids. At the same time, steel is usually used as a base in such parts, and a coating of fluoroplastic or other similar material is applied to it to protect it from corrosion.

— Silumin. Silumins are called aluminium alloys with the addition of silicon. For several reasons, such materials are rare in pumps, and mainly among relatively inexpensive models.

— Rubber. Material traditionally used for diaphragms in vibratory pumps (see “Pump type”).
Werk WQD15 often compared
Werk SPW12 often compared