USA
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Multimedia   /   USB Flash Drives

Comparison SanDisk Ultra Dual m3.0 16Gb vs SanDisk Ultra Dual USB Drive 3.0 16Gb

Add to comparison
SanDisk Ultra Dual m3.0 16Gb
SanDisk Ultra Dual USB Drive 3.0 16Gb
SanDisk Ultra Dual m3.0 16GbSanDisk Ultra Dual USB Drive 3.0 16Gb
Compare prices 1Compare prices 1
TOP sellers
Memory size16 GB16 GB
Technical specs
USB versionUSB 3.2 gen1 and microUSBUSB 3.2 gen1 and microUSB
Read speed130 MB/s130 MB/s
Features
OTG
OTG
General
Retractable connector
Materialplasticplastic
Lanyard hole
Manufacturer's warranty5 years
Size30x26x12 mm11x19.8x36.6 mm
Weight5 g
Color
Added to E-Catalognovember 2016december 2015

Lanyard hole

A hole in the body of the flash drive that allows you to securely fasten the drive to the strap and wear it as a key fob. As a rule, the eyelet for the strap is located on one of the ends of the flash drive body (on the side or in the center).

Manufacturer's warranty

Manufacturer's warranty provided for this model.

In fact, this is the minimum service life promised by the manufacturer, subject to the rules of operation. Most often, the actual service life of the device is much longer than the guaranteed one. But an indicator of 5 years suggests that the flash drive is more likely to be lost or become irrelevant. You can also come across a lifetime warranty, however, in this case it is better to drown out the details to which it applies. And anyway, it implies a certain period of time, though measured in decades. In addition to confirmation of reliability, such a guarantee allows you to contact the supplier after a while to eliminate possible problems (of course, not mechanical). But the difficulties in implementing this procedure (the representative office is located only in large cities) and the rare cases of the need for this (after all, it is easier to buy a new flash drive, with the exception of vital information on the old media) make the lifetime warranty more of a marketing ploy than a cool chip.
SanDisk Ultra Dual m3.0 often compared