Catalog   /   Photo   /   Digital Cameras

Comparison Kodak FZ55 vs Sony W620

Add to comparison
Kodak FZ55
Sony W620
Kodak FZ55Sony W620
Compare prices 56
from $94.00
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
Camera typedigital compactdigital compact
Sensor
SensorCCD (CCD)CCD (CCD)
Sensor size1/2.3"1/2.3"
Total MP16.76
Effective MP number16.3514.1
Maximum image size4608x3456 px4320x3240 px
Light sensitivity (ISO)80 - 3200100 - 3200
Lens
Aperturef/3.9 - f/6.3f/3.2 - f/6.5
Focal length28 - 140 mm28 - 140 mm
Optical zoom45
Image stabilizationopticalin absent
Min. focus distance60 cm
Macro shooting, from5 cm5 cm
Photo shooting
Exposure compensation± 2 EV, in 1/3 EV steps± 2 EV, in 1/3 EV steps
Exposure modes
auto
shutter priority
aperture priority
manual mode
auto
Metering system
point
centre-weighted
sensor (estimated)
point
centre-weighted
sensor (estimated)
Video recording
File recording formatsMOVMotionJPEG
Maximum video length
 
memory limit
Connection ports
 
headphone Jack
Focus
Autofocus modes
one shot
tracking
in face
one shot
Viewfinder and shutter
Viewfinderin absentin absent
Shutter speed30 - 1/2000 с2 - 1/1600 с
Continuous shooting1.1 fps
Screen
Screen size2.7 ''2.7 ''
Screen resolution230 thousand pixels230 thousand pixels
Memory and communications
Built-in memory8 MB28 MB
Memory cards typesSD, SDHCSD, SDHC, SDXC, MemoryStick
Flash
Built-in flash
Application range3 m
Power source
Power source
battery
battery
Battery modelNP-BN
Shots per charge220 шт
General
Charger modelACC-TRBX
Materialplasticaluminium / plastic
Dimensions (WxHxD)98x56x20 mm
Weight116 g
Color
Added to E-Catalogjanuary 2023january 2012
Compare Kodak FZ55 and Sony W620
Price comparison
Kodak FZ55 often compared
Glossary

Total MP

The total number of individual light sensitive dots (pixels) provided in the camera's sensor. Denoted in megapixels - millions of pixels.

The total number of MPs, as a rule, is greater than the number of megapixels from which the frame is directly built (for more details, see "Effective number of MPs"). This is due to the presence of service areas on the matrix. In general, this parameter is more of a reference than practically significant: a larger total number of MPs with the same size and effective resolution means a slightly smaller size of each pixel, and, accordingly, an increased likelihood of noise (especially at high ISO values).

Effective MP number

The number of pixels (megapixels) of the matrix directly involved in the construction of the image, in fact — the number of points from which the captured image is built. Some manufacturers, in addition to this parameter, also indicate the total number of MPs, taking into account the service areas of the matrix. However, it is the effective number of MPs that is considered the main indicator — it is this that directly affects the maximum resolution of the resulting image (see “Maximum image size”).

A megapixel is 1 million pixels. Numerous megapixels ensures high resolution of the captured photos, but is not a guarantee of high-quality images — much also depends on the size of the sensor, its light sensitivity (see the relevant glossary items), as well as hardware and software image processing tools used in the camera. Note that for small matrices, high resolution can sometimes be more of an evil than a blessing — such sensors are very prone to the appearance of noise in the image.

Maximum image size

The maximum size of photos taken by the camera in normal (non-panoramic) mode. In fact, this paragraph indicates the highest resolution of photography — in pixels vertically and horizontally, for example, 3000x4000. This indicator directly depends on the resolution of the matrix: the number of dots in the image cannot exceed the effective number of megapixels (see above). For example, for the same 3000x4000, the matrix must have an effective resolution of at least 3000*4000 = 12 million dots, that is, 12 MP.

Theoretically, the larger the size of the photo, the more detailed the image, the more small details can be conveyed on it. At the same time, the overall image quality (including the visibility of fine details) depends not only on resolution, but also on a number of other technical and software factors; see "Effective MP number" for more details.

Light sensitivity (ISO)

The sensitivity range of a digital camera matrix. In digital photography, light sensitivity is expressed in the same ISO units as in film photography; however, unlike film, the light sensitivity of the sensor in a digital camera can be changed, which gives you more options for adjusting shooting parameters. High maximum light sensitivity is important if you have to use a lens with a low aperture (see Aperture), as well as when shooting dimly lit scenes and fast-moving objects; in the latter case, high ISO allows you to use low shutter speeds, which minimizes image blur. However, note that with an increase in the value of the applied ISO, the level of noise in the resulting images also increases.

Aperture

Aperture of the lens installed in the camera or supplied with it in the kit (for models with detachable optics).

In a simplified way, this parameter can be described as the ability of the lens to transmit light - in other words, how much the light flux weakens when passing through the optics. It is believed that two main indicators affect the characteristics of light transmission: the size of the relative opening of the lens and its focal length. Aperture is the ratio of the first indicator to the second; in this case, the size of the active hole is taken as one and is generally omitted when recording, as a result, such a recording looks, for example, like this: f / 2.0. Accordingly, the larger the number after the fraction sign, the lower the aperture ratio, the less light the lens transmits.

Zoom lenses (zoom lenses), as a rule, have different aperture values for different focal lengths. For such optics, two values of this parameter are indicated in the characteristics, for the minimum and maximum focal lengths, for example, f / 2.8–4.5. There are also vario lenses that maintain a constant aperture over the entire range of focal lengths, but they are much more expensive than analogs with variable aperture.

The high light transmission of the lens is important if the camera is planned to be used for shooting in low light conditions or for shooting fast moving objects: high-aperture optics allow you to shoot at low sensor sensitivity (which...reduces the likelihood of noise) and at low shutter speeds (at which moving objects are less blurry) . This parameter also determines the depth of field of the imaged space: the higher the aperture ratio, the smaller the depth of field. Therefore, for shooting with artistic background blur (“bokeh”), it is recommended to use fast lenses.

Optical zoom

The magnification factor provided by the camera by using the capabilities of the lens (namely, by changing its focal length). In models with interchangeable lenses (see “Camera type”), indicated for the complete lens, if available.

Note that in this case the magnification is indicated not relative to the image visible to the naked eye, but relative to the image produced by the lens at minimum magnification. For example, if the characteristics indicate an optical zoom of 3x, this means that at the maximum magnification, objects in the frame will be three times larger than at the minimum.

The degree of optical zoom is directly related to the range of focal lengths (see above). You can determine this degree by dividing the maximum focal length of the lens by the minimum, for example 360mm / 36mm=10x magnification.

To date, optical zoom provides the best "close" image quality and is considered to be superior to digital zoom (see below). This is due to the fact that with this format of work, the entire area of \u200b\u200bthe matrix is constantly involved, which allows you to fully use its capabilities. Therefore, even among low-cost models, devices without optical zoom are very rare.

Image stabilization

An image stabilization method provided by a camera. Note that optical and sensor-shift systems are sometimes combined under the term "true" stabilization, due to their effectiveness. See below for more details.

Stabilization itself (regardless of the operating principle) allows you to compensate for the "shake" effect when the camera is not positioned correctly - especially when shooting handheld. This is especially important when shooting with significant magnification or at long shutter speeds. However, in any case, this function reduces the risk of ruining the frame, so cameras with stabilization are extremely common. The operating principles can be as follows:

— Electronic. Stabilization is carried out by means of a kind of “reserve” — a section along the edges of the sensor, which is not initially involved in the formation of the final image. However, if the camera electronics detect vibrations, it compensates for them by selecting the necessary fragments of the image from the reserve. Electronic systems are extremely simple, compact, reliable and at the same time inexpensive. However, for their operation, it is necessary to allocate a fairly significant part of the sensor — and reducing the useful area of the sensor increases the noise level and degrades the image quality. And in some models, electronic stabilization is enabled only at lower resolutions and is not available at full...frame size. Therefore, in its pure form, this option is found mainly in relatively inexpensive cameras with non-replaceable optics.

— Optical. Stabilization is achieved when light passes through the lens — due to a system of moving lenses and gyroscopes. As a result, the image gets to the sensor already stabilized, and the entire area of the sensor can be used for it. Therefore, optical systems, despite their complexity and rather high cost, are considered more preferable for high-quality shooting than electronic ones. Separately, we note that in SLR and MILC cameras (see "Camera type") the presence of this function depends on the installed lens; therefore, for such models, optical stabilization is not indicated in our catalog in principle (even if the kit lens is equipped with a stabilizer).

— With sensor shift. Stabilization performed by shifting the sensor "following" the shifted image. Like the optical one described above, it is considered a fairly advanced option, although in general it is somewhat less effective. On the other hand, sensor shift systems have serious advantages — first of all, such stabilization will work regardless of the characteristics of the lens. For cameras with non-replaceable optics, this means that the lens can do without an optical stabilizer and make the optics simpler, cheaper and more reliable. In SLR and MILC cameras, sensor shift allows even "non-stabilized" lenses to be used with convenience, and when "stabilized" optics are installed, both systems work together, and their efficiency is very high. In addition, sensor shift is somewhat simpler and cheaper than traditional optical stabilizers.

— Optical and electronic. Stabilization that combines both of the above options: initially, it operates on an optical principle, and when the lens's capabilities are not enough, an electronic system is connected. This allows for an increase in overall efficiency in comparison with purely optical or purely electronic stabilizers. On the other hand, the disadvantages of both options in such systems are also combined: the optics are comparatively complex and expensive, and not the entire sensor is used. Therefore, such a combination is rare, mainly in individual advanced digital compacts.

— With sensor shift and electronic. Another type of combined stabilization systems. Like "optical + electronic", it improves the overall efficiency of stabilization, but at the same time combines the disadvantages of both methods (they are also similar: more complicated and more expensive camera plus a decrease in the useful area of the sensor). Therefore, this option is used extremely rarely - in single models of digital ultrazooms and advanced compacts.

Min. focus distance

The minimum distance from the camera lens to the object being shot, at which the lens is able to focus in the normal shooting mode (not with macro shooting, see "Macro shooting, about it").

Exposure modes

Exposure modes supported by digital camera. Exposure is the amount of light that hits the camera's sensor when shooting a single frame. It is determined by two main parameters — shutter speed and aperture: increasing the shutter speed or opening the aperture leads to an increase in exposure, and vice versa. There are four main control modes for these parameters:

— Automatic. Both shutter speed and aperture are chosen by the camera itself, based on an automatic assessment of the specifics of the scene being shot. This mode is very convenient, because it saves the user from fiddling with the settings and allows even people who do not have photography experience to work with the camera. At the same time, automatic exposure does not allow the use of many artistic techniques and can fail under non-standard shooting conditions; and even in relatively simple situations, the settings chosen by the system are not always optimal.

— Shutter priority. A mode that provides manual exposure setting. The aperture is automatically adjusted by the camera. This scheme of work is useful in situations where you need to clearly define the shutter opening time: for example, when shooting dynamic scenes, the shutter speed should be minimal, and when shooting art with motion blur, on the contrary, long.

— Aperture priority. A mode that provides manual aperture setting; shutter speed is automatically determined by the camera. The depth of field depends on the ap...erture value: shooting with artistic background blur (“bokeh”) is carried out with the petals as wide as possible, but reducing the aperture opening reduces the degree of blur and increases the depth of field. Accordingly, this mode is convenient in cases where the correct depth of field plays a key role.

— Manual mode. The ability to independently set any shutter speed and aperture value. On the one hand, this requires serious knowledge and skills from the photographer, because there is a high risk of spoiling the frame without calculating the exposure parameters. On the other hand, manual adjustment gives complete freedom and provides features that are not available in other modes (in particular, it allows you to intentionally “underexposure” and “overexpose” the image).