Comparison TALKo D50220 22 cm gray vs TALKo D40220 22 cm gray
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| TALKo D50220 22 cm gray | TALKo D40220 22 cm gray | |
from $6.00 | from $3.24 | |
| TOP sellers | ||
| Type | deep frying pan | deep frying pan |
Specs | ||
| Size | 22 cm | 22 cm |
| Bottom thickness | 5 mm | |
| Wall thickness | 5 mm | |
| Wall height | 5.6 cm | |
| Pan material | cast aluminium | cast aluminium |
| Handle material | bakelite | bakelite |
| Non-stick coating | in absent | in absent |
| Features | dishwasher compatible | dishwasher compatible |
| Country of origin | Ukraine | Ukraine |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | february 2017 | february 2017 |
Compare TALKo D50220 and D40220
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Glossary
Bottom thickness
In general, a thick bottom is considered more preferable than a thin one: the thicker the bottom, the more evenly the heat is distributed over it, the higher the quality of cooking and the lower the likelihood that the product will burn in some places. In addition, thick material is less prone to deformation from strong heat and temperature changes. True, the massive bottom also affects the weight of the product, but in most cases this moment is not significant - on the contrary, it contributes to the stability of the pan and reduces the risk of tipping it over by negligence. Of the unequivocal disadvantages, only the high cost of thick pans can be noted, but it is usually justified taking into account performance.
It is believed that for most cases a bottom thickness of at least 5 mm is desirable. However, in pans for pancakes (see "Type") and other "quick" fried foods, smaller indicators are also allowed - from 3 mm. As a rule, the bottom thickness corresponds to the wall thickness (see below), but exceptions are possible.
It is believed that for most cases a bottom thickness of at least 5 mm is desirable. However, in pans for pancakes (see "Type") and other "quick" fried foods, smaller indicators are also allowed - from 3 mm. As a rule, the bottom thickness corresponds to the wall thickness (see below), but exceptions are possible.
Wall thickness
The thickness of the walls of the pan.
Thick material weighs more and costs more, but these disadvantages are outweighed by a number of advantages. Firstly, thicker walls distribute and retain heat more evenly, and also reduce the likelihood of overheating; all this is especially important when stewing, simmering and other similar cooking methods. Secondly, a large weight reduces the likelihood of overturning the pan, inadvertently hitting it. Thirdly, thick material better resists strong heat and temperature changes.
The minimum indicator for a quality pan is a wall thickness of 3 mm, and ideally it should be 5 mm or more.
Thick material weighs more and costs more, but these disadvantages are outweighed by a number of advantages. Firstly, thicker walls distribute and retain heat more evenly, and also reduce the likelihood of overheating; all this is especially important when stewing, simmering and other similar cooking methods. Secondly, a large weight reduces the likelihood of overturning the pan, inadvertently hitting it. Thirdly, thick material better resists strong heat and temperature changes.
The minimum indicator for a quality pan is a wall thickness of 3 mm, and ideally it should be 5 mm or more.
Wall height
The height of the walls is selected by the manufacturer depending on the type of pan (see above) and its size, however, similar products may vary in the height of the sides. In such cases, it is worth considering the features of the intended application. So, high sides are convenient for stewing, preparing sauces and other types of cooking that involve a large amount of liquid; in addition, they allow you to fit more content. On the other hand, deep pans are more expensive and heavier. The shallow depth, in turn, makes it easy to flip pancakes, omelettes and other similar dishes, but reduces capacity.