Comparison Rainberg RB-2202 stainless steel vs Rainberg RB-2201 green
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Rainberg RB-2202 stainless steel | Rainberg RB-2201 green | |
| Outdated Product | Outdated Product | |
| TOP sellers | ||
| Device type | chopper | chopper |
Specs | ||
| Main bowl | 2 L | 2 L |
| Power | 1300 W | 1300 W |
| Number of speeds | 2 | 2 |
| Pulse mode |  | |
| Capacities | main bowl | main bowl |
| Nozzles | chopper knife | chopper knife |
General | ||
| Power source | mains | mains |
| Main bowl material | metal | glass |
| Cable length | 0.8 m | |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | may 2024 | may 2024 |
Compare Rainberg RB-2202 and RB-2201
You may be interested in
Rainberg RB-2202 often compared
Glossary
Main bowl material
The substance that the jar of the countertop blender is made of (refer to "Device type"), or the material of the blender attachment (refer to "Nozzles"). The most widely used materials are:
— Plastic. Plastic is a popular choice for blender jars due to its low cost, lightweight, and sufficient strength for kitchen use. Its transparency allows for easy monitoring of the product being blended. However, plastic is prone to scratching, which can cloud the bowl and reduce the device's appearance. Scratches can occur from everyday use or rough cleaning with abrasive products.
— Glass. Glass blender jars are transparent and allow for easy monitoring of the contents. They are more resistant to scratches than plastic and do not lose transparency during use. Cleaning them harshly does not affect their transparency, and any cloudiness can be easily removed. However, glass is heavier, more expensive than plastic, and is more sensitive to impacts. A glass blender jar can break from a fall that plastic could withstand.
— Metal. Metal blender jars are durable and stylish, often surviving falls without damage. However, they are less convenient than plastic because their opaque walls make it difficult to observe the blending process. Metal is also more expensive than plastic, making it less commonly used, mainly in high-end devices.
— Plastic. Plastic is a popular choice for blender jars due to its low cost, lightweight, and sufficient strength for kitchen use. Its transparency allows for easy monitoring of the product being blended. However, plastic is prone to scratching, which can cloud the bowl and reduce the device's appearance. Scratches can occur from everyday use or rough cleaning with abrasive products.
— Glass. Glass blender jars are transparent and allow for easy monitoring of the contents. They are more resistant to scratches than plastic and do not lose transparency during use. Cleaning them harshly does not affect their transparency, and any cloudiness can be easily removed. However, glass is heavier, more expensive than plastic, and is more sensitive to impacts. A glass blender jar can break from a fall that plastic could withstand.
— Metal. Metal blender jars are durable and stylish, often surviving falls without damage. However, they are less convenient than plastic because their opaque walls make it difficult to observe the blending process. Metal is also more expensive than plastic, making it less commonly used, mainly in high-end devices.