Comparison Philips CX3050 vs Philips CX2050
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Philips CX3050 | Philips CX2050 | |
| Outdated Product | from $172.00 | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
| Type | desktop | desktop |
| Mechanism | axial | axial |
Specs | ||
| Power consumption | 27 W | 24 W |
| Number of speeds | 3 | 3 |
| Air flow | 738 m³/h | 738 m³/h |
| Range | 25 m | 25 m |
| Minimum noise level | 23 dB | 23 dB |
| Maximum noise level | 40 dB | 40 dB |
Features | ||
| Functions | oscillation wind imitation tilt adjustment timer | oscillation wind imitation tilt adjustment timer |
| Diameter | 22 cm | 22 cm |
| Cable length | 1.8 m | 1.8 m |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 44x32x30.7 cm | 44x32x30.7 cm |
| Weight | 2.38 kg | 2.26 kg |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | june 2024 | june 2024 |
Compare Philips CX3050 and CX2050
Fans Philips CX3050 and Philips CX2050 have similar characteristics, such as power consumption (27 W vs 24 W), number of speeds (3), performance (738 m³/h), and air flow (25 m). Both devices operate on an axial mechanism and offer features like a oscillating system, wind simulation, tilt adjustment, and a timer. The weight difference is: CX3050 weighs 2.38 kg, while CX2050 is 2.26 kg. The color options also differ: CX3050 is available in black, and CX2050 is available in white.
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Philips CX2050 often compared
Glossary
Power consumption
The maximum power consumed by the fan during operation. The higher the power consumption, the higher, usually, the greater the airflow rate created by the fan, and, accordingly, the higher the performance of the device. On the other hand, power usually directly affects the price, all other things being equal.