USA
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Desktop PCs

Comparison Acer Aspire C24-1700 DQ.BJWME.001 vs Acer Aspire C24-1750 DQ.BJ3ME.004

Add to comparison
Acer Aspire C24-1700 (DQ.BJWME.001)
Acer Aspire C24-1750 (DQ.BJ3ME.004)
Acer Aspire C24-1700 DQ.BJWME.001Acer Aspire C24-1750 DQ.BJ3ME.004
Outdated ProductOutdated Product
TOP sellers
Product typemonoblockmonoblock
Screen
Screen size23.8 "23.8 "
Resolution1920x1080 (16:9) px1920x1080 (16:9) px
Panel typeIPSIPS
Surface treatmentanti-glare
Brightness200 cd/m2
CPU
Typeportableportable
SeriesCore i5Core i5
Model1235U1240P
Code nameAlder Lake (12th Gen)Alder Lake (12th Gen)
Cores1012
Threads1216
Speed0.9 GHz1.2 GHz
TurboBoost / TurboCore4.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Passmark CPU Mark13633 score(s)17532 score(s)
Cinebench R151357 score(s)
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Speed3200 MHz3200 MHz
Number of slots22
Max. memory support32 GB32 GB
Graphics card
Graphics card typeintegratedintegrated
Graphics card modelIris Xe GraphicsIris Xe Graphics
Storage
Drive typeSSDSSD
Drive capacity512 GB512 GB
NVMe
M.2 connector
Back panel
Connectors
HDMI output
HDMI output
USB 2.011
USB 3.2 gen133
USB C 3.2 gen111
Monitors connection11
Front Panel
Optical driveis absentis absent
mini-Jack (3.5 mm)
Multimedia
LAN (RJ-45)1 Gbps1 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth++
Speakers
Built-in microphone
Webcam
Kensington / Noble lock
General
Keyboard and mousewiredwired
PSU power65 W65 W
Preinstalled OSno OSno OS
Materialplasticplastic
Dimensions (HxWxD)420x540x200 mm420x540x200 mm
Weight5.2 kg5.2 kg
Color
Added to E-Catalogjune 2023june 2023

Surface treatment

Type of own screen cover in monoblock (see "Type").

Glossy. The most common type of coating in modern PCs. Such a surface (with the same characteristics of the matrix) noticeably surpasses the matte one in terms of brightness and colour saturation in the visible image. The main disadvantage of gloss is the tendency to glare in bright ambient light; however, all-in-one PCs are not often used in such conditions, and this phenomenon can be compensated by increasing the brightness of the backlight. With all this, this type of coverage is quite inexpensive.

Glossy (anti-glare). A modified version of the glossy finish (see above) that, as the name suggests, is more resistant to glare. At the same time, in terms of picture quality, such screens are usually not inferior to classic gloss. On the other hand, the anti-reflective surface is somewhat more expensive, and its advantages in this case are not often really significant. Therefore, screens with such a coating are found in modern monoblocks much less often than glossy ones.

Matte. The key advantages of a matte finish are its low cost and the almost complete absence of glare, even in bright ambient light. On the other hand, the image on such a screen is dimmer than on glossy displays (including anti-glare) with similar matrix characteristics. Therefore, this type of coating is rarely used...nowadays — mainly in relatively inexpensive household and business models, for which a bright picture with saturated colours is not fundamental.

Brightness

The maximum brightness provided by the monoblock screen (see "Type").

The more intense the ambient light, the higher the screen brightness should be for normal visibility. The most "dim" screens in monoblocks are capable of delivering up to 200 cd / m2 — this is more than enough to work under ordinary artificial lighting, but under sunlight it will take at least 300 cd / m2. At the same time, modern monoblocks can also have a larger margin of brightness — in some models up to 500 cd / m2. This expands the possibilities for customizing the screen for different situations and user preferences. In addition, high brightness has a positive effect on image quality and colour saturation, in light of which it is often a sign of a fairly advanced screen.

Model

The specific model of the processor installed in the PC, or rather, its index within its series (see "Processor"). The full model name consists of the series name and this index — for example, Intel Core i3 3220; knowing this name, you can find detailed information about the processor (characteristics, reviews, etc.) and determine how suitable it is for your purposes.

Cores

The number of cores in a complete PC processor.

The core is a part of the processor designed to process one stream of commands (and sometimes more, for such cases, see "Number of threads"). Accordingly, the presence of several cores allows the processor to work simultaneously with several such threads, which has a positive effect on performance. However note that a larger number of cores does not always mean higher computing power — a lot depends on how the interaction between command streams is organized, what special technologies are implemented in the processor, etc. So, only chips of the same purpose (desktop, mobile) and similar series (see "Processor") can be compared by the number of cores.

In general, single-core processors are practically not found in modern PCs. Mainly desktop chips of the initial and middle level are made dual-core. Four cores are found both in desktop CPUs of the middle and advanced class, and in mobile solutions. And six-core and eight-core processors are typical for high-performance desktop processors used in workstations and gaming systems.

Threads

The number of threads supported by the bundled PC processor.

A thread in this case is a sequence of instructions executed by the kernel. Initially, each individual core is able to work with only one such sequence. However, among modern CPUs, more and more often there are models in which the number of threads is twice the number of cores. This means that the processor uses multi-threading technology, and each core works with two instruction sequences: when pauses occur in one thread, the core switches to another, and vice versa. This allows you to significantly increase performance without increasing the clock frequency and heat dissipation, however, such CPUs are also more expensive than single-threaded counterparts.

Speed

Clock speed of the CPU installed in the PC.

In theory, higher clock speeds have a positive effect on performance because they allow the CPU to perform more operations per unit of time. However, this indicator is rather weakly related to real productivity. The fact is that the actual capabilities of the CPU strongly depend on a number of other factors - the overall architecture, cache size, number of cores, support for special instructions, etc. As a result, you can compare by this indicator only chips from the same or similar series (see “CPU”), and ideally, also from the same generation. And that's pretty approximate.

Passmark CPU Mark

The result shown by the PC processor in the test (benchmark) Passmark CPU Mark.

Passmark CPU Mark is a comprehensive test that allows you to evaluate CPU performance in various modes and with a different number of processed threads. The results are displayed in points; the more points, the higher the overall performance of the processor. For comparison: as of 2020, in low-cost solutions, the results are measured in hundreds of points, in mid-range models they range from 800 – 900 to more than 6,000 points, and individual top-end chips are capable of showing 40,000 points or more.

Cinebench R15

The result shown by the PC processor in the test (benchmark) Cinebench R15.

Cinebench is a test designed to test the capabilities of the processor and graphics card. The creator of this benchmark, Maxon, is also known as the developer of the Cinema 4D 3D editor; this determined the features of testing. So, in addition to purely mathematical tasks, when using Cinebench R15, the processor is loaded with processing high-quality three-dimensional graphics. Another interesting feature is the extensive support for multithreading — the test allows you to fully check the power of chips that process up to 256 threads at a time.

Traditionally, for CPU benchmarks, the test results are indicated in points (more precisely, points — PTS). The more points scored by the CPU, the higher its performance.
Acer Aspire C24-1750 often compared