Power
The rated power of a massager is more of a reference than a practical concern for most users. Generally, massagers consume less than 80 watts, with higher ratings, up to 400 watts, observed in specific chair cover models that heavily rely on extensive infrared heating. However, power consumption is usually not a significant factor, especially for models powered by a household outlet. Manufacturers carefully select power levels to ensure the effective performance of claimed functions and modes. When choosing a massager, it's more practical to focus on other relevant aspects rather than getting overly concerned about power ratings.
Application
Parts of the body for which massager is intended.
While primarily linked to the massager type (as discussed earlier), the effectiveness of these devices can vary significantly based on factors such as modes and attachments. It's crucial to adhere to the specifications and guidelines for use, as even similar-looking models may differ in their intended applications. Using a massager in a manner not specified in the manual, even if permissible for a similar model, can result in various unpleasant consequences, including potential injuries.
Now on the market there are massagers for almost any part of the body, namely:
eyes,
face,
head,
neck,
shoulders,
arms,
back,
chest,
abdomen,
hips,
calves,
feet.
Power source
—
Network. Operating on a standard 230 V outlet, these massagers are tethered by the length of their power cord, potentially causing inconvenience. However, they offer almost unlimited usage time, are lighter, and more cost-effective compared to battery-powered models. Finding an available outlet is typically not a concern.
—
Network/cigarette lighter. These devices can be powered by both a standard household electrical network and a 12 V car cigarette lighter socket, making them suitable for use in cars. Most of these models, primarily chair covers designed for car seats, fall into this category.
—
Batteries. Food for these massagers comes from replaceable elements of standard size, which can be either disposable batteries or rechargeable ones. Disposable batteries are budget-friendly but require frequent replacements, whereas rechargeable ones are costly upfront but eliminate ongoing expenses. This power source enables the massager to function independently of electrical outlets. However, the operational time on a single charge is limited, but when the charge depletes, batteries can be readily swapped out, unlike built-in batteries. One drawback of this option includes its poor suitability for high-powered devices and increased weight compared to plug-in models.
— Battery. Operated by its proprietary built-in battery, this method allows t
...he massager to function independently of electrical outlets, similar to the batteries mentioned earlier. However, the built-in battery cannot be quickly replaced and is often non-removable, which means that recharging is necessary once it depletes. This process not only requires access to a power source but also consumes a considerable amount of time. Additionally, such massagers tend to be pricier and heavier compared to mains-powered models. On the positive side, they can offer significantly more power than battery-operated devices, and the initial purchase typically includes the battery without extra costs.
Note that batteries/battery models may additionally provide the possibility of mains power supply. This allows you to save power if there is a power outlet nearby, and in some models even charge the battery while you work.
